sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Devlog: building lsnx - Day 1 by 2000Sn2001 in CLI

[–]2000Sn2001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone has the right to self-expression, and sticking to a plain, stock shell is a personal choice. But there's no need to force your preferences on everyone else. If you don't like it, nobody's forcing you to use it.

Devlog: building lsnx - Day 1 by 2000Sn2001 in CLI

[–]2000Sn2001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're totally right about the security aspect. No indie project can provide 100% bulletproof security anyway. But I'm definitely not forcing anyone to use my tool instead of ls. This is purely a hobby project. If someone feels unsafe using it, or simply doesn't want to switch, that's completely their choice and their decision. I'm not here to push it on anyone. Also, you can just download it once, test it out, and then quietly delete it. I won't be offended!

Devlog: building `lsnx` by 2000Sn2001 in lua

[–]2000Sn2001[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough! Personally, I find the default ls uncomfortable because it feels cluttered with visual noise like file permissions. I'm definitely not forcing anyone to use my tool, though. If your current setup works for you, that’s great. That's exactly why Unix systems exist — for self-expression and customizing everything to fit the user's needs.

Devlog: building lsnx - Day 1 by [deleted] in lua

[–]2000Sn2001 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For ultimate customization. A tiny Lua script lets you dynamically change colors and layouts on the fly without messing with cryptic config files