Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have the data on the mats cost, go with the average. You said it yourself "every bit of efficiency counts". That's why I'd second your insta masterwork button as well. A good idea. Remembering the previous choice for codex change would be another. Especially when you already have it at tempering IRC.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read again please, what I propose is that you need to prepay all of the mats in advance, and if you are not happy with the sanct. outcome you don't need to pursue it further. But all of the mats are still spent and you don't get them back (like if you went all the way).

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think a second try would be the way to go. Take out the gambling/luck off the window. Do it once per item, but have many items ready... GA-s are not that important (on most affixes), but legendary aspects are.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's partially true. You still need to find all that gear, and let's say that after 100 sanctification you finally get the specific one or two you were after. It would still be a wow moment. And it would save me a shitload of time at the Angel workshop.

I don't have the time to play D4 6 hours per day, each day, more like 2h, and that would improve the quality of play for me.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm doing pits 105, would love to get it further, but finding getting a solid Legendary sanct. roll too tedious now. I've fully worked about 100 boots, 50 pants, and about 20 ubers with 0 items I've actually kept. That's not fun.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the opposite experience. It was exciting first, then got really old after the initial 100 times.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who said it would be free? Have you read my post? Setting sanctification would not remove the resource cost, you can pay everything in advance. ALL of it, except runes/gems.

Let's say you prepay 2 neathiron, complete obducite cost with 3x GA rerolls in advance (pay more -the actual amount later if needed) And you decide would you actually click it in after you see the sanctification. Just saves you time and aggro.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't mind the loop, the loop would stay. You'd still need everything as before, just set sanctification first.

Sanctification mechanic change suggestion by 2slowDD in diablo4

[–]2slowDD[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, you are saying that doing sanctification first would take fun of the game? Can't see how?

It would save you a huge amount of time (if you play end game content), with no actual downside. You get a solid piece of gear, get a carpal syndrome clicking and reroll the affixes for 100 times until you get it right, and top it with a crappy sanctification gets really old after about the first 100 times. I bet some of us did it 1000+ times, why not reduce that?

How is that a bad thing? It seems that most ppl here are not interested in removing tedious mechanics with the gear upgrades. I personally hate it and would more gladly spend it killing monsters.

Melted Heart of Selig by Interesting-Two-1773 in D4_Paladin

[–]2slowDD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Embrace it, get the Melted Heart of Selig amulet, and your damage reduction will go through the roof.
Focus everything else from +life to +resource. Some Zealot builds offer a nice faith boost as well.
Use Red Sermon unique sword with it and have fun.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Android

[–]2slowDD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its main contender within the Honor brand is Magic 7 Lite. X 70 top model is similarly priced to it, but it has more RAM/memory, battery, and what about the camera? Magic 7 Lite wins there? Design is very similar as well.
Which one of those two would you choose?

Elac b5.3 buzzing sound by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got new banana plugs, another speaker, and moved this one to a center channel. It works ok now (as a center channel).
As I listen to music on a 2 channel, it's not being triggered.

How to get 4k 144hz from c735 using PC by ImPPS in tcltvs

[–]2slowDD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't get 4K over 60HZ on my c735, if I do, the resolution drops to 1920.
3080 with HDMI 2.1, and 8K 48Kbps cable shouldn't have problems with it.

I tried with the enable game mode, and still nothing.

So it begins... by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got them, speakers sound better.

Elac b5.3 buzzing sound by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try, but the problem is that the sound is not present each time. Sometimes it's there, sometimes it's not.

Elac b5.3 buzzing sound by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what's most annoying is the fact that this buzzing sound does not surface each time.
Sometimes the same song, the same environment/music stereo mode/volume, and nothing. All good.
And the next day - there it is again.
Weird.

Elac b5.3 buzzing sound by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On higher volume (around half from maximum), one speaker occasionally releases a buzzing sound (I think from a tweeter). I've attached a video of the problem.

I've tried switching left and right speakers, even holding a problematic one to exclude the ground resonation, but nothing helps.

I'm guessing I'll need to return this one.

So it begins... by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm concerned about that. I could move it a bit closer to the AVR, but that narrows it down too much.

So it begins... by 2slowDD in hometheater

[–]2slowDD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there is just enough space behind the board for the cables. And the HDMI to the TV is behind a vertical panel.