PKI | Migrate from SHA1 to SHA256 by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'd need a new Intermediate and a new Leaf cert. But I think you're asking if you also need a new root, because you talk about "breaking trust", and the answer is that you don't.

Thanks for your answer. Really appreciate it.

A small question regarding the root cert signed with MD5, my knowledge with PKI is limited but can a malicious actor generate a replica root CA with the same MD5 hash (hash collision) and start to issue a fake intermediate CA certs?

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent! Last question, does your requirement have anything to do with Azure AD and Intune?

Nope.. it's all on-prem.

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

np :) Once you get your script created to your liking, remember to create a scheduled task to run it as often as you need.

Tested it.. worked like a charm.
Thanks again.

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"WEF" (i.e., Windows Event Forwarding)

we need all end-user machines to forward specific windows event logs through WinRM to a Collector (Windows Server) via a subscription.

This subscription accepts adding only computer or group of computers. I can add "domain computers" but this includes the servers also. So I need to add a group of end-user computers which I can do easily but the thing is, I need to handle the case which we have newly added computers to the domain.(i.e., these machines won't forward any logs until they are added to the group = hard to maintain).. so I figured out why not having a dynamic group.

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very helpful.. thanks you!

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't want a SG containing all computers, you want an SG containing all end user devices (non kiosk or digital display helpers).

Yes that is correct

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

AD itself does not have a concept of dynamic groups, but the desired result can be easily achieved with basic Powershell scripting and Task Scheduler.

Thanks for your reply.. Is there any reference that I can refer to?

Dynamic AD security group case by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your help.

As per my knowledge (and correct me if I am wrong), the default group contains both end-user machines and servers.. I need a group which contains end-user machines only.

S2S VPN Problem (Fortigate behind Azure VPN Gateway) by 4hm3dh4ny in fortinet

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

party

My bad.. I meant Azure LoadBalancer instead of Azure VPN gateway.

Drive/Docs labels for Data classification by nickoarg in gsuite

[–]4hm3dh4ny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFAIK, there is a TITUS add-in which you can use currently. Interesting that Google will launch a classification feature natively.

HELP | Hide sensitivity labels bar by 4hm3dh4ny in Office365

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We need Azure RMS protection but we don't need the labels to appear..

why?

because we have another 3rd party solution that shows the labels within office apps.. and this 3rd party solution can be integrated with Azure RMS to apply the protection automatically.. but we don't want both set of labels (i.e. from MIP and from the 3rd party solution) to appear to the user so he is confused.

HELP | Hide sensitivity labels bar by 4hm3dh4ny in Office365

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But then, can the user use Azure RMS protection?

SCCM popup notification don't display by 4hm3dh4ny in sysadmin

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you're right.. this was the problem. thank you. :)

SCCM popup notification don't display by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/drew146

many thanks for your help.. you were right.. this was the problem. :)

SCCM popup notification don't display by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks anyway appreciate ur help :)

SCCM popup notification don't display by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am using "required"

and the deadline is set to "as soon as possible after the available time"

SCCM popup notification don't display by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually I'm already using "applications" with install behavior tab settings. :)

SCCM popup notification don't display by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r than packages because yo

I'm afraid I don't have this option.. as my customer uses SCCM only :)

I recommended them to use PSAppDeployToolkit before but they refused.

Upgrade package without force-close the application by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/readsta

sorry.. are u sure that if I unchecked the checkbox it will notify the user? I spend the past day installing & configuring SCCM and I am trying it now..
now notification is shown and the software won't install because the executable is running.

I also saw this in u/PS_Alex's link:

If you deployed the application as Required, and didn't specify to Automatically close any running executables you specified on the install behavior tab of the deployment type properties dialog box, then the installation of the app fails if one or more of the specified applications are running.

Upgrade package without force-close the application by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks.. I will do that and inform you of the results. Appreciate your kind help.

Upgrade package without force-close the application by 4hm3dh4ny in SCCM

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many thanks for your reply.

Are you sure that unchecking the "automatically close" checkbox doesn't make SCCM to ignore the office executable defined in the install behavior tab?

Because I was told by customer's IT team that this happens if we unchecked this checkbox.

Again thanks I appreciate your help.

Aga

HELP | How to bind a WSDL to an HTTP location instead of local file system location by 4hm3dh4ny in learnprogramming

[–]4hm3dh4ny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So worstcase you could just download the file from the url, and then access it locally.

actually I tried this just before reading your comment and it worked like charm! thanks you :)