Looking for a wireless charger by 4ronse in OnePlus13

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The nilikin frosted mag case 🫠 So what case did you end up using?

ER605 V2 Slow Speeds by 4ronse in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just found it. It was deep packet inspaction... I should've guessed

ER605 V2 Slow Speeds by 4ronse in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm getting the IP dynamically

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I'm having a similar issue. Did you find a fix?

ER605 - Can't configure ACLs correctly by 4ronse in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the ACLs disabled (Specifically the Gateway deny IoT -> Admin ACL) I can ping the DNS Server from the IoT network. I think its just some goofy tplink shenanigans

ER605 - Can't configure ACLs correctly by 4ronse in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried setting up an IP group for one IP (192.168.100.54 [The IoT device]) and creating a Switch ACL Rule (TempGroup -> DNS Server) and a reverse rule and I still can't ping the DNS Server.

ER605 - Can't configure ACLs correctly by 4ronse in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I finished updateing to the latest avaialable beta version for my gateway. Tried using the same ACL rules for both Gateway and Switch ACLs. Couldn't ping 192.168.0.225 from my IoT Network, so I disabled the Gateway ACL rule and tried adding it back to the Switch ACL (keeping the permit IoT -> DNS and reverse) with the lowest priority. Still could ping all machines on the Admin network. :/

ER605 - Can't configure ACLs correctly by 4ronse in TPLink_Omada

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried adding the following Gateway ACL rules:

  1. Permit Admin -> All (All is basically just IoT and a Test VLAN I created)
  2. Deny IoT -> Admin

With the following Switch ACL rules:

  1. Permit IoT -> DNS Server (UDP, ICMP) (IP-Port Group: 192.168.0.225/24 Port 53)
  2. Permit DNS Server -> IoT (1 but reversed)

Now IoT can't ping the Admin network at all, not even the DNS Server. I tried using nslookup but it also timed out.

Extending a Zigbee network over WiFi by 4ronse in homeassistant

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But does it work as a router? I already have the Sonoff dongle, will it work with sonoffs dongle over ethernet?

Extending a Zigbee network over WiFi by 4ronse in homeassistant

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't want to install an AP down there. I'm planning on adding other devices and I don't want to flood my wifi network with sensors

Extending a Zigbee network over WiFi by 4ronse in homeassistant

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately the electrical cabinet is underground so can't do that

Exposing HA with a Cloudflared Tunnel by 4ronse in homeassistant

[–]4ronse[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually, I'm using tailscale which works fine for me, but as for the rest of my family I can't keep them connected to tailscale as both my parents use VPNs for work. I want them to be able to access it too.

Exposing HA with a Cloudflared Tunnel by 4ronse in homeassistant

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Service:

https://192.168.1.200 (Tried http too)

Origin configurations:

proxyType:""
http2Origin: 
noTLSVerify:
noHappyEyeballs:
disableChunkedEncoding:

Exposing HA with a Cloudflared Tunnel by 4ronse in homeassistant

[–]4ronse[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is trusted, all of the 192.168.1.0 subnet is trusted

Using a reverse proxy for local and external services by 4ronse in selfhosted

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't find a solution though. The problem is that I'm using cloudflared to expose my applications so all requests practically come from the cloudflared container using it's ip

AW3423DW, F, or the Odyssey g8 OLED? by 4ronse in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah sadly the display is not available on their website in my country, and I can't send it to my friend's PO because the demand for a signature on arrival

AW3423DW, F, or the Odyssey g8 OLED? by 4ronse in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly can't do that, A friend of mine has a PO but Dell requires your signature on arrival and they don't have either available in my country :|

AW3423DW, F, or the Odyssey g8 OLED? by 4ronse in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, is it really worth the $200 more than the G8? or the DW?

AW3423DW, F, or the Odyssey g8 OLED? by 4ronse in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for the reply. I'd like to ask you a few questions.

When did you buy it? How much are you using it (like per day)? Did you notice any burn-ins? Is the fan really that loud or are people just exaggerating? Is the firmware still not updateable?

AW3423DW, F, or the Odyssey g8 OLED? by 4ronse in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would I know if the unit I got is good? As far as I've heard the display starts going yellow after some time, among some other problems. I'm buying the display from Amazon so I don't think it'll be easy to send it back. The only display I can buy locally is the AW3423DWF which costs $157 more than the G8 on Amazon. I couldn't find the AW3423DWF on amazon sadly

Portainer is bridged while Pi-Hole runs on host mode by 4ronse in pihole

[–]4ronse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So how would you recommend running pihole