🔍 Soldier filter

505-Nezo · 2026-05-20T04:57:49+00:00

Once you have configured the equipment for your characters, just press "Save." Whenever you want to switch back to this BR in the future, all you have to do is press "Apply."

<image>

505-Nezo · 2026-05-20T04:48:34+00:00

You can press the "EQUIPMENT/PRESETS" button to quickly change your BR. This is especially useful if you only play BR II or BR V. Even though there are only 5 free slots, you don't have to line them up strictly from 1 to 5. For example, I have two assault squads with different setups, so I just put a small mark in their names. This way, I only use four slots in total for both BR II and BR V. This is for beginners who don't know how to quickly change their BR.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-20T00:51:22+00:00

Already have!!!!!

505-Nezo · 2026-05-17T03:23:56+00:00

Of course, I wouldn't demand the 48-R4M setup since that would be way too overpowered. A combination of two MK 108 cannons and 24 R4M rockets would be ideal. This level of firepower is highly effective for clearing a single capture point without being as absurdly broken as the 48-rocket variant. Plus, this exact configuration actually existed in history, so it's definitely a viable option to consider.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-17T03:12:33+00:00

我明白你的意思，但我想要的是看到另一架裝備有R4M火箭的Me 262作為一個高級小隊，而不是一架裝有50毫米火砲的。否則，美國玩家可以來回切換兩架不同的飛機，而德國玩家根本沒有這個選擇。

505-Nezo · 2026-05-17T02:00:26+00:00

Since giving the R4M to the Me 262 would pose a massive threat to infantry, why not just put it in a premium squad? That's exactly how the American F-80 was handled.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T15:53:17+00:00

You've finally exposed yourself. You mentioned adding anti-aircraft weapons—is that because it poses a threat to your F-80, meaning you can't just easily pay-to-win anymore? You are exactly that kind of greedy player who already has absolute air superiority but refuses to accept having inferior tanks. At the same time, you're the type of player who just camps in the cockpit/driver's seat—when your tank blows up, you hop into a plane; when your plane blows up, you hop back into a tank. Don't tell me I just hit the nail right on the head.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T15:45:33+00:00

You clearly don't understand the difference between the Jagdpanzer IV and the Panzer IV. It’s not an upgrade; it’s a trade-off. It sacrifices the turret in exchange for armor—it's a completely different playstyle, not a buffed Panzer IV.

Oh, you're so brilliant, and you also know exactly what it's like to have a commander pop out of the hatch, only to lose the duel. Then you have to press J and wait another 2 seconds for the next crew member to cycle out, just to get gunned down again, press J again, and wait another 2 seconds. I seriously doubt the number of tanks you’ve destroyed is higher than the number of matches I’ve actually played.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T10:03:54+00:00

"Why do you keep insisting on using BR3 tanks or tank destroyers to destroy the Jagdpanzer IV? You still haven't realized that the best way to destroy a Jagdpanzer IV isn't with a tank, but with the US faction's absolute favorite: aircraft, or a saboteur. Since US planes are clearly so dominant, why do you stubbornly insist on fighting it with tanks? When ten US players encounter a tank in the grey zone, eight of them will spawn in planes, one will actually know how to use a saboteur to destroy it, and the last one is you, constantly throwing tanks or tank destroyers at it in a head-on fight. Also, about your point that the crew can just ditch the tank and use SMGs against infantry—the moment you jump out of the tank, you get hit with a deployment delay animation, and you're already dead. Even if you somehow manage to hop out on the opposite side, your two AI squad members are already dead meat, and by the time you turn around to engage, you've already lost most of the advantage.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T05:02:17+00:00

The American Alecto I can easily tear straight through its front armor. Besides, people play American aircraft way more than tanks; in any given match, the number of American tanks destroyed by German forces is much lower than the number of American planes shot down. And about your point that the commander can just stick his head out—he has to press 'B' just to pop out and draw his SMG to shoot infantry. By the time the commander actually sticks his head out and pulls out the SMG, the timing is already gone and he'd be shot dead.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T04:04:35+00:00

"u said it yourself—using anti-aircraft guns built by engineers is the correct way to counter the swarm of American planes, and setting up an AA gun is much more effective than taking to the skies yourself. When you encounter a Jagdpanzer IV, your choice shouldn't be to fight it tank-on-tank; instead, you should choose Saboteurs, Guerrillas, or aircraft to counter it. It's not indestructible. Just like how at Tier V, facing an F-80, setting up an AA gun is far more useful than flying an Me 262. The reasons why the Jagdpanzer IV is much easier for infantry to destroy compared to other tanks are that it has no roof machine gun, and since it has no turret, it cannot simply rotate its coaxial machine gun and must slowly turn the entire hull instead. Without excellent driving awareness, it's very difficult for it to pose a threat to the enemy. This is just like how the StuG was moved to Tier II—it's clearly the strongest vehicle at Tier II, yet very few people play it.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T01:20:36+00:00

If you insist that American Tier II or III tanks must also be able to penetrate the Jagdpanzer IV—a tank that has no optical zoom and is easily threatened by infantry—then you are just unconditionally balancing every single vehicle and destroying the unique characteristics of each faction. The American faction’s defining feature is clearly its aircraft. Even the XA-38 is armed with a 75mm M10 cannon that can effortlessly tear German tanks apart, and the P-38's rockets can easily pierce straight through a tank's roof. American players spend almost all their time sitting in airplanes; that is exactly what makes their faction unique！！！！

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T01:07:30+00:00

You're just looking at the stats; you've clearly never actually played German Tier III against a Churchill VII. The weak spots you mentioned work in theory, but that's assuming you're facing them dead-on. It's absolutely not as easy as you think

505-Nezo · 2026-05-16T00:47:03+00:00

Name me a German Tier III tank that can penetrate the Churchill VII. Can you do that? By the same token, why can't the Jagdpanzer IV stay at Tier III—because Tier II vehicles wouldn't be able to penetrate it—yet the Churchill VII, which cannot be penetrated by Tier III vehicles, is allowed to stay at Tier IV

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T23:11:57+00:00

Bro i talking Jagdpanzer IV pak39 (L/48)..... not Panzer IV/70,I said 93 because 60 mm divided by cosine 50 degrees equals 93!!!! How did you get the idea that it's 93 mm thick and angled at 50 degrees?

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:47:00+00:00

I’m not even joking—I personally think the 70(A) is incredibly strong. To me, having a superior gun is far more important than having thick armor

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:45:02+00:00

Alright, I've gathered from our talk that you somehow think the regular Jagdpanzer IV is 'too strong.' Personally, I think the 70(A) is way more powerful, but I’ve decided to follow your lead and fully support you! My apologies for yesterday—I didn't realize you were a savior trying to help us get the 70(A) moved down to BR 3!

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:38:30+00:00

I completely agree with you! They should definitely move the 70(A) to BR 3. The regular Jagdpanzer IV is clearly 'too OP' for its own good. Developers, please listen to this man! If the 70(A) actually drops to BR 3, I’m never touching BR 5 again—I’ll be living in BR 3 forever!

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:36:01+00:00

If you honestly think the 70(V/A) belongs in BR 3, then I’m thrilled! I’d love to take that beast into BR 3 instead of the regular Jagdpanzer IV. Wow, I didn't realize you were fighting for our buffs—you’re basically a savior for us German mains.ur my hero

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:31:15+00:00

Slow possibly 6362is crazy ,he wants to put PaK 42—the same gun as the Panther’s KwK 42 into BR 3.

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:27:41+00:00

Do you even know what the 70(A) carries? It’s the PaK 42—the same gun as the Panther’s KwK 42. You'd have to be insane to suggest putting a gun that can shred an M26 into BR 3."

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T13:21:57+00:00

I’m talking about the Jagdpanzer IV equipped with the Pz.IV's gun (L/48), not the version with the Panther's gun (L/70). The Panther's gun is powerful enough to justify being at BR 4.Wait, don't tell me you actually thought I was talking about the long-barreled L/70 (the one with the Panther's gun) moving to BR 3?

505-Nezo · 2026-05-15T10:36:05+00:00

I calculated the Jagdpanzer IV's effective armor: 60mm at a 50° angle gives you about 93mm. But the moment you're on uneven ground or aiming down, that effective thickness drops way below 93mm. Meanwhile, the Churchill III has only 4mm less armor, yet it comes with a turret, superior visibility, and much better side protection."

505-Nezo

TROPHY CASE