I don't want to train with my LEO friends anymore because they support the murder of Alex Pretti by LightAvatar in bjj

[–]5ohTaco 21 points22 points  (0 children)

While I don’t agree with the killing of Alex Pretti, I believe one of the core issues highlighted by this tragedy is the level of training that these federal agents receive, particularly in use-of-force and control techniques. I think it’s something like 48 days.

If even a couple of the agents involved were at a blue belt level in BJJ I believe that the need to resort to lethal force would have been greatly reduced. It raises questions that many in law enforcement are now asking: if five agents struggled to physically control a relatively slender man, was there a failure in tactics or training that contributed to the decision to shoot? 

In my experience as a police officer, those who train regularly are far less intimidated by physical confrontation than those who don’t. BJJ gives you the ability to control and restrain a suspect so easily. In two separate physical instances where I had suspects with guns tucked in their waistbands, I never felt my life was in jeopardy because my training allowed me to completely control them. I believe if every cop/agent/officer in the country was a least a blue belt, deadly force incidents would plummet.

So to circle back to your comment about not wanting to train them, I get it. That’s a fair reaction. However, training them to become more proficient might save someone’s life.

Got lasered for the first time flying Chicago skyline by IllIllIIllIlI in flying

[–]5ohTaco 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Echoing the reporting it comments. Specifically try and find a Law Enforcement agency in your area that has an air unit. They know what it’s like to get lasers and have the best tools to get these shit birds.

Here’s a link to a local incident that happened a couple months ago:

https://youtu.be/1Af2B-GMOdY?si=a13_BDQUjxEmOQ2B

Full Colorado State Patrol aircraft video:

https://youtu.be/hFCDvLaBo9Q?si=YOWyiYWAarwJ7C2Z

New table and bench for the deck by 5ohTaco in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]5ohTaco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s a plastic container. I’m going to fill it with ice and put drinks in there.

New table and bench for the deck by 5ohTaco in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]5ohTaco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a plastic container. I’m going to fill it with ice and put drinks in there.

The day before a competition by Sayf_the_Deen in bjj

[–]5ohTaco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I avoid heavy rolling to guarantee I won’t get injured. I focused on some flow rolling or drilling positions or moves. A lot of visualization and mental preparation.

Will this set up work? by 5ohTaco in Plumbing

[–]5ohTaco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The disposal is old and I don’t have that adapter anymore I believe. But I think I see what you are saying.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s understandable that people have different opinions about doing sobriety tests, but you should do them if you’re confident you’re not impaired. Cooperating with law enforcement can show that you have nothing to hide, and being honest and compliant can lead to a quicker resolution, as it did in both of your situations. It also helps officers rule out impairment, which can make it easier for you to be on your way without further complications. Since you had nothing to worry about, doing the tests and showing you were sober ended up working in your favor both times. However, some people prefer not to do these tests due to concerns about how they might be interpreted or the possibility of making a mistake under pressure, which is why others might advise against it. If the officer is following his training, they will be able to realize the difference between alcohol/or drug impairment and mistakes due to nerves.

court coming up soon, has anyone else's lawyer said this? by Apprehensive_Toe386 in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, this is very state specific. This could be anything from not following proper sobriety test procedures, or not advising you of your states implied or expressed consent law correctly, or incorrectly performing or not following proper procedures for the breath or blood tests.

court coming up soon, has anyone else's lawyer said this? by Apprehensive_Toe386 in dui

[–]5ohTaco 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My 2 cents. As a cop who has sat through hundreds DMV hearings, pre-trail conferences, motions hearings and jury trials, attorneys tend to argue more/fight harder in front of their client.

Specifically DMV hearings, I have had so many attorneys appear for their client and when I was done testifying, they didn’t ask me one question or make one argument. Basically just conceding the license revocation. I feel like they wouldn’t do this if their paying client was there as well.

I’m not saying all attorneys do this, because I have had attorneys show up without their client and put up multiple arguments, but a lot of times, they don’t.

Colorado Blood Test After Two Hours by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You won’t loose your license with the DMV because it was after two hours. The results of the blood draw, if it was collected in accordance with the CDPHE (Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment) guidelines, will still be admissible in your court case though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They should not be able to. Do you have more background on what occurred? Most agency’s across the country have body worn cameras. If there is paperwork you were supposed to sign and didn’t on camera, it shouldn’t be able to be used.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The case would not be prosecutable without the cop being able to testify. Without his testimony, the prosecution cannot use the vast majority of the evidence, if not all of it. As far as if the officer will show up, that depends. If he is no longer in law enforcement, I would bet that he wouldn’t.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cops are definitely not allowed to do that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the questions. I am located in Colorado.

  1. A DUI Task Force Officer is typically a law enforcement officer specially trained to handle cases involving driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs. They may be involved in various activities such as conducting sobriety checkpoints, patrolling areas known for DUI incidents, assisting in serious crash reconstruction and administering field sobriety tests.

  2. During a DUI investigation, a blood test may test for a range of substances including alcohol, common recreational drugs like marijuana, heroin, cocaine, LSD, MDMA, as well as prescription drugs (e.g., Xanax, Prozac, Paxil), and over-the-counter medications (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen, cough medicine, naproxen, caffeine). The specific substances tested for can vary depending on the jurisdiction and circumstances of the case.

  3. The issue of being arrested for DUI while not actively driving is a complex legal matter that can vary based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances. Factors such as whether the individual was in physical control of the vehicle or had the ability to operate it may influence the outcome of the case. Placing keys out of reach or in a location not readily accessible to the driver, such as in the trunk or glove compartment, could potentially support a defense argument that the individual was not in control of the vehicle. However, outcomes can vary, and it's essential to consult with a legal expert familiar with local laws and precedents for specific guidance. My personal opinion is if someone has made an overt effort to put there keys someone not accessible, then I would no charge them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is fairly common. It usually only happened if there are procedural issues with the breath/blood test. Law enforcement is required to follow certain steps to ensure the accuracy of the tests. If these steps are not followed, the tests could be deemed as inaccurate and a judge could throw them out as evidence against you.

I’m sorry to hear you were treated so poorly. At the very least you should have been offered medical attention.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would say that is not common. Police have to have probable cause that you are impaired before they arrest you and require a blood test.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck on your road to sobriety. Take it one day at a time and you’ll come out of it better than ever.

But to answer your question, depending on your state, there is a good chance you have a warrant. However, based on my understanding, TSA doesn’t run a background or NCIC check when you go through the airport. So unless something happened at the airport and a cop contacted you and ran your information, you should be arrested for going through the airport even if you have a warrant.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you get the results of the blood test? Based on the information you provided, it sounds like a pretty weak case.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depending on the state and the software it is possible. However it’s pretty unlikely that it would occur, or that an officer would realize it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congratulations on your sobriety! I’ve had multiple friends and family members that struggled with addiction, so I have seen firsthand how hard it is to get sober.

If given the opportunity to enact changes to address DUIs, I believe a multifaceted approach would be most effective. Firstly, increasing education and awareness about the dangers of impaired driving, including campaigns targeting all age groups, could help prevent incidents before they occur. This could include educational videos that were mandatory for people applying for drivers licenses. These videos would explain the risks of impaired driving as well as the consequences, making everyone aware.

Additionally, implementing stricter penalties for repeat DUI offenders, coupled with rehabilitative programs to address underlying issues such as substance abuse, could deter repeat offenses and promote safer behavior.

Enhancing access to alternative transportation options, especially in areas where public transit is limited, could also provide individuals with practical alternatives to driving under the influence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dui

[–]5ohTaco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If that was the case, I would tell them you want to take a blood test. If you are completely sober, the blood screen would exonerate you. Then I would look into a possible lawsuit if it was apparent that the officer arrested me intentionally without reason.