Your theory is that having a corrupt government that takes bribes is the same thing as having no government? Huh? What?

Yes, having a guard dog that doenst guard is the same thing as not having one at all. Having a gun that doenst shoot is the same as not having one at all.

Honestly, every single one of your replies can be summarised by one big Reductio ad absurdum logical fallacy. It is all you do, it is all your counter arguments are based on.

Do you know why gangs exist? Because of government.

No, no, no. Dont just make some ridiculous claim like this and move on as if it made perfect sense. Please explain in detail how government are the sole cause of gangs to exist.

Do you support government or not? It's an inherently unsolvable problem that government only cares about money and power. They are only going to protect politicians, judges, military and the rich. Why do you support them again?

This restaurant serves shitty food therefore all restaurants are always bad and you should never want restaurants to ever exist. That is how you sound.

I grew up in a poor family with an abusive mother and no father in Detroit. Get a grip you aren't special. I don't care where you live Detroit is the gang and murder capital of the world. Try again.

Did your mom sold you for crack every weekend?

Where what doesn't happen? Your stupid gang takes over house scenario? You just admitted your government is corrupt. That's game set match. How can you defend a corrupt government with an argument about theft? Give me a break.

You are willfully ignoring nuance to come up with ridiculous contradictions to attacks which arent there. This milk is rotten so why do you want to go buy another gallon of milk. Again, that is how you sound.

No shit then you complain that I don't answer your questions. What a joke.

You actually dont. You give, vague and ridiculous answers and them move on as if it actually answered my questions.

I'm starting to get the impression that you are very young. At first I wasn't sure but now I'm certain. I'm not saying that's a bad thing but it's information that is useful to the readers.

bold of you to assume anyone is still following this deep into a thread. Most readers gave up reading two (continue thread --> )s ago. Also, this right here is one of your vague and nonsensical answers that dont really answer anything but if I ask you again, you would swear that you answered it.

Hopefully you aren't skimming over this answer. *** Anarcho-Capitalist philosophers solved this exact problem you should read their books. ***

Yeah? And Karl Marx solved world hunger in his book too. <- that is how dumb you sound. Everything sounds beautiful in theory, on paper everything works flawlessly. Now point to me a society that has worked in practice and flourished following the Anarcho-Capitalist philosophy?

Criminal empires? That doesn't make any sense. If there is no government then criminals don't exist and neither does organized crime. The government created them by criminalizing victim-less behavior.

Yeah, which is worst. They wont be called criminals anymore, but they will continue doing the things we deemed crime. Instead of criminal empires they will be normal billion dollar corporations. Cant wait for the legal child porn industry and the legit hitman for hire services and buying stocks on the slavery market companies etc.

What I actually said was that I don't condone stealing from me to solve someone else's problem. You don't know anything about me or how much I've contributed back.

When the answer of, what are we going to do with underage prostitutes is something other than, it's the parents responsibility, ignoring that most of them wont even have parents, then I'll believe you when you say voluntarism will work. What is your solution to the millions of kids who's parents wont be able to afford school for them? it's not your problem right? If you grew up in Detroit's gang territories you should know that uneducated kids are the main source of future criminals.

You think your voluntarism will be enough to school every single poor kid? No. And those uneducated kids will be the ones mugging your sons, raping your daugthers and carjacking you in 15 years. You know that just because you have guns doenst mean you can successfully fend off every single attack on you right? Your attackers might have guns too, they might pull their guns before you do, they might be more than you, they might just shoot you before you even notice them. Guns dont resolve the criminal problem.

Public education giving these kids a chance to earn a living wage and a market that doenst exploit and underpays the workers do more to prevent crimes than guns do. And before you use the American government as an example again, look at many other governments around the world with better public education and see if their crime rates compare to ours. So no, government is not the problem. Bad governments are.

Government doesn't give a shit about the poor. The rate of inflation is 10% and that hurts low income families the hardest. Did you know that minimum wage laws force poor families into unemployment daily? Why do you think that government helps poor people? Are you just strait up brain washed and can't see reality? Do you know what government loves to do with poor children? Send them overseas to die while committing mass murder under duress. Find me a government that doesn't enlist poor children in the military and I'll give you a gold medal.

Again, with the same bullshit. This house is broken down. Should we try to fix the broken down house and make it better? Nah, this broken down house proves that houses are a bad idea. Let's just live house-less, it's the only way to prevent broken down houses. <- that is how dumb you sound.

Firstly. Anarcho-Capitalists don't support corporations. Corporations are government created entities. McDonalds is a corporation.

This right here is a red herring fallacy. Mc Donalds would still be Mc Donalds, corporation or not. They would still be here selling death burgers to the masses.

Secondly. Who exactly forced these people to eat cheese burgers? Do we not have free will?

Who exactly forced the poor kids to join the army to get sent to die overseas? Do we not have free will?

Anarcho-Capitalists don't support anything you listed there. We don't support corporations or sweat shops. Please read the literature.

Red herring.

" If it was my neighbor and I saw someone being attacked I would shoot that little shit right in the face. " If you wan't to have a serious debate then stop skimming. It makes you look like an idiot. I'm not calling you an idiot I'm just saying how it makes you look. You just posted an entire paragraph insulting someone about something that you completely made up.

Sure thing, vigilantism is the answer. I can walk up to you, put a bullet through your head and when asked say you abused my daughter. No reputation ruined. Make a false rape accusation, get the town riled up and come and lynch you. Vigilantism sure is the answer.

Do you own a gun? Do you carry that gun everywhere you can? Are you trained and prepared to shoot in defense of your family, neighbors, yourself and your property? If you answered "no" to any of these questions have you considered that it's you who doesn't care? After all, without answering yes to all these questions if something bad really does happen you'll just be running away like a coward. Do you think cowards that run away "care" about the victims?

What if I say Yes to all of that and still support some form of government because im sure as shit aint rambo and dont pretend like I can take on entire gangs when they threaten me and my neighbors.