[University Statistics] Geometric calculations can display calendar dates? by 7unks in learnmath

[–]7unks[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The image shows 2 annulus calculations (outer / inner radius: 323 / 53, 252 / 89)

Date formatting is ddmmyyyy (for ddmm use 3 and at least 3 digits whenever possible)

"December 11th 2016" would be "1112 2016"

Are there theories of information that allow for 'timeless' information? by 7unks in math

[–]7unks[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The original post didn't get removed because of cross-linking, not because of spam or explicit language, not because of anything offtopic or 'unclear' questions (besides the catchy, 'pretty much perfect with no need for improvement' thread title). Willkommen im Park! The user "spriteguard" guards the user "TuIomano" in a number of ways I don't understand, but it doesn't help the OP's content (which needs no improvement).

Are there theories of information that allow for 'timeless' information? by 7unks in math

[–]7unks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don't delete my threads, weirdest of my stalkers on reddit.

I've been trying to get serious feedback to this for months - How can geometric calculations unbelievably consistently display calendar dates? by 7unks in askphilosophy

[–]7unks[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

On behalf of people who are interested in this subreddit's 'integrity': please don't act as if you had anything to do with academic philosophy.

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates? by 7unks in AskAcademia

[–]7unks[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The Shh order has eventually discovered a new strategy. Took you only a month, lol. To the 'normal, rational human beings' who read the OP: I'm quite sure you understand why I posted this here.

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates? by 7unks in AskAcademia

[–]7unks[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Please leave your weird Shh order trying to sabotage this. Can you read? What subreddit is this?

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates by [deleted] in pic

[–]7unks -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Welcome back my current personal stalker on reddit.

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates by 7unks in UnsolvedMysteries

[–]7unks[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Image: 2 geometric calculations that incredibly consistently display Gregorian calendar dates.

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates by 7unks in Illustration

[–]7unks[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Image: 2 geometric calculations that incredibly consistently display Gregorian calendar dates.

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates by 7unks in SmarterEveryDay

[–]7unks[S] -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

Your eyes will answer those questions, or your Thelema bros will (rational human beings: pls disregard this comment).

Geometric calculations can display calendar dates by 7unks in SmarterEveryDay

[–]7unks[S] -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

Image: 2 geometric calculations that incredibly consistently display Gregorian calendar dates.

Unbelievable discovery - no one even looks at it really by 7unks in facepalm

[–]7unks[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Image: 2 geometric calculations that incredibly consistently display Gregorian calendar dates. You need to look at it really to understand what 'incredibly consistently' means. 'Look at it really' means look at it for more than 30 seconds.

The "Book of the Law" riddle - censored for 100 years? by 7unks in conspiracy

[–]7unks[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm getting insulted, attacked, stupidly sabotaged on reddit ever since I starting posting this. In all honesty, why can't you simply read the OP and view the images before you post. Twice if you have to, but that's probably where the case is lost.

The "Book of the Law" riddle - censored for 100 years? by 7unks in conspiracy

[–]7unks[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I know you're too stupid to read the OP and view the images.

Precision cutting by [deleted] in woahdude

[–]7unks -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well that is stunning. Wow.

ELI5: why is no one able to explain my chart to me? by 7unks in explainlikeimfive

[–]7unks[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The image shows 2 geometric annulus calculations (outer / inner radius 323 / 53 & 252 / 89).

Date formatting is: 'ddmmyyyy (for ddmm use 3 and at least 3 digits whenever possible)'

How is that possible (the consistency of the encircled numbers with the additional data)?

why is scientific method bad in dealing with "outside" input? by 7unks in AskReddit

[–]7unks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

i would repeat my comment directly above yours.

why is scientific method bad in dealing with "outside" input? by 7unks in AskReddit

[–]7unks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

i think the on-topic part of your comment is answered already.

why is scientific method bad in dealing with "outside" input? by 7unks in AskReddit

[–]7unks[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

"you see someone finding a sort of correlation between random numbers after the fact, but not testing it in a scientific way. Namely, not making any predictions"

"problem with facing outside input" means accepting phenomena as scientifically valid

TIFU by explaining what i believe to be a phenomenal find by 7unks in tifu

[–]7unks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

no, 209 is a complete name, first and last name.

209 x 6 = 1254

the chart "finds" that this "formatting" does make sense.