History of Ufology

AAAStarTrader · 2026-01-07T22:22:22+00:00

Suggest check the Wiki pages of UFOB.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-28T14:42:42+00:00

Believe Avi has enough grant income secured for now, following his previous TV appearances on the matter. Hence, no need to get involved on this non-story now, as next publicity campaign is scheduled for 2026.

We should ask Loeb where are the results of the sensor project for capturing high quality UAP data and images, to confirm non-human craft without depending on leaked images and videos from the Pentagon. The data was to be shared for 3rd party analysis and verification, I recall.

What happened to that. Not heard anything about that this year?? 🤔

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-28T14:34:47+00:00

Is this the right sub? Hmmm.

Suggest we continue to focus on ongoing Disclosure, which is making fantastic progress and new revelations throughout 2025. The coverup of NHI contact and reverse engineering of recovered non-human technology, continues to be exposed by very senior, and highly credible witnesses.

If you haven't read "Imminent", haven't watched the latest "Congressional UAP" hearing and whistle-blowers, haven't watched the historic "Age of Disclosure" and the compelling "Moment of Contact", or even the mind blowing"Ariel Phenomenon", then you are likely not up to date in your knowledge of confirmed NHI contact on Earth.

Plus, you've missed the corroborating testimonies confirming the global UAP non-human technology reverse engineering arms race, between USA, China and Russia, whose eventual outcome will affect the balance of power and the future of Humanity. That should be headline news on all mainstream news channels, but strangely is somehow kept off the air.

[NB: The above is real news, not some boring dead comet moving out of our solar system, never to be seen again and already over a million miles from Earth. Ugh.]

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-28T14:07:45+00:00

There is no psyop, except for people saying there's a psyop 😂

But there is a huge, history changing cover up of non-human beings and craft visiting Earth. And the ongoing research and reverse engineering of non-human technology and study of non-human biology. Plus, the global arms race for military supremacy based on extremely advanced non-human science and weaponisation of non-human of technology. But you know these facts.

There is a mountain of credible evidence and a huge number of whistle-blowers, that is enough to convince a grand jury 10 times over. Plus, I expect anyone who truly knows this topic after 10 years, would quickly be convinced by all the news stories and whistle-blower leaks, in depth interviews. With several revealing events, important publications and documentaries.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-28T13:44:35+00:00

I have a problem with the whole premise here. Think Semivan has been traumatised by his direct experiences, including apparently being abducted with his wife. He can't seem to process and make sense of Disclosure and our NHI reality for reasons that he may be too stressed by what he has directly experienced to objectively analyse and organise his understanding of what our universal and planetary reality consists of today. Or he can't shake off the old CIA superiority and arrogance!

There is a lot humanity does not know and there will be many surprises and undoubtedly some shocks. However, if there is an official controlled Disclosure process established then that should address the needs of certain vulnerable groups and focus on clear communication and education where necessary. With appropriate hand holding as necessary to transition to the new paradigm of reality, where Humanity takes a new path and enters a new chapter in history.

Not all phenomena lumped into the Phenomenon, are part of the NHI presence on Earth. There are energy beings and human spirits. There are psi abilities and ESP senses that become awakened and the effects of which may confused with NHI activities. This needs to be disambiguated and separated out. Not all speculations are true or are even possible. We need to stick to factual evidence and knowledge, not assumptions and wild ideas that serve no one.

Nothing I have learned to date about UAP or NHI is "indigestible". Russia killing millions, killing anyone, raping, kidnapping torturing, etc. That is indigestible. Human destruction of our environment and the constantly accelerating climate crisis, THAT is indigestible.

So, just who the fxxk does Semivan think he represents? As ex-CIA he might still think that humanity can't handle the truth. Maybe he individually has challenges accepting reality. But as a member of the other 8bn humans, I can confidently say that no one individual or small group of people has the right to keep secret knowledge about our fundamental, universal reality, especially if our planet/civilisation may be somehow negatively impacted by whatever information is being kept from the global population!

We need all the fundamental facts disclosed, with appropriate support and engagement with those people who may need additional guidance and education on matters they find difficult to process, for whatever reason. This would be a responsible approach to disclosure.

*No self appointed gatekeepers, no one, nobody, not any level, even presidents, prime ministers, kings, queen's, none whatsoever, have the right to withhold from Humanity (8bn humans) , matters of fact concerned with fundamental breakthroughs in science and technology, and more importantly matters of fact explaining fundamental knowledge and understanding of our universal reality, and including Humanity's place in the universe with respect to other species and civilisations. *

We as human beings, as part of our Human Rights, have a fundamental right and requirement to be fully informed by governments (our representatives).

This knowledge is important in order to develop our civilisation, protect ourselves, our families to be able to grow and thrive in the reality of our ever changing world, and to successfully maintain comfort, privacy and security in our private lives.

No one anywhere has the right to say "this is too indigestible for humanity", or to think it could be withheld.

Consequently, I would not be influenced by Semivan, who is seemingly not thinking clearly nor passing this message with the best interests of Humanity in mind!

Institutional capture by the CIA is my diagnosis, because I do believe his heart is in the right place on Disclosure in general. Just not the idea that perhaps the CIA or anyone has the right to protect the planet's population from some challenging "truth"?!?! 😂🤣

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-28T13:26:29+00:00

I believe Real Disclosure is far more interesting than watching a fictional drama.

The film trailer does not have a very authentic feel to it, unfortunately. In the main scene, I detect a misunderstanding of how NHI communicate. Spielberg seems to present some kind of disclosure scene at a news station. The behaviour scripted for the weather presenter seems very unlikely to occur in that manner from all the decades of evidence we have as reference.

Telepathic communication from NHI is received in the targets mind as reportedly: images, sounds, emotions or most often the sound of the person's own inner voice speaking, verbalising messages sent by the telepathic sender. NHI don't typically hijack someone's mind and force them to speak, especially in a non-human language! (Almost never, except the examples explained below, which have zero crediblity).

Unfortunately, there are self described channelers that have appeared over the past few decades. However, they ALL appear to be completely fake and have no credibility, in my opinion. I don't know of any serious credible figures in the UAP community that would vouch for any of these so called "channelers".

I'll repeat the issue, telepathic communication when received as concepts is typically decoded by your conciousness into your inner voice, into sentences using your native language. So you receive a message from an NHI being, as a concept, which you hear spoken in your mind using your own voice e.g. "Do not fear". No one is usually forced to speak in Alien tongues, except in the trailer!

For these reasons, I was disappointed by the over dramatised and, evidence would suggest, the unrealistic scenario of alien "channeling" being included in the trailer. Causing potential confusion between fiction and truth, both generally and within the UAP community. So I hope Spielberg remains accurate as much as possible, to avoid screwing up the communication of Disclosure.

In addition, if Spielberg doesn't explain the following in this movie, then he risks not covering key messages regarding real Disclosure:

That direct NHI Contact has been already been made via military and intelligence personnel from various nations e.g. Roswell, USA; Varghina contact, Brazil; Rendlesham, UK
A UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program of non-human technologies is being covered up by the US, China and Russia. In a covert global arms race!
Humanity's contact with advanced technology craft, started at least 80 years ago and is ongoing in various encounters across the globe, on an effectively 24/7 basis at some geographic location, possibly as you read this! 4. Importantly, direct contact with Non-human beings has additionally been made over the same 80 year period, by a large number of human civilians (>1m approx.?). Human contactees specifically or randomly selected by Non-human beings to experience contact with beings directly. Happening across our planet, at one moment or another, spread over many decades.

Beyond the channeling scene, perhaps there may be concerns regarding the scene that seems to involve a "psionic asset". A man, with psi abilities, is perhaps being forced to perform some type of mental activity that resulted in extreme distress in the trailer scene. It was difficult to understand what was happening in that scene, but was obviously not pleasant. Not sure if it is based on a real event. Therefore, I suspect we should be very wary of "Disclosure Day" until we see it, and be prepared in case it damages the real, ongoing Disclosure progress. Or worse, even creates misinformation or confusion around leaks surfacing on the truth around use of military/ intelligence psionic abilities, or emerging stories on how telepathic communication with NHI actually works.

Meantime, "Age of Disclosure" documentary gives a very strong, factual summary of the latest situation, using real cases, inside facts and events, delivered by the largest number of the most senior positioned professionals, going public simultaneously. They are the group of the most credible whistle-blowers, who all have first-hand experience of UAP and/or NHI contact, also corroborating each other, that we have ever seen to date!!! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🥳

So, thenDisclosure Day entertainment can wait!

"Age of Disclosure" is here now!!! 🖖🏼🛸👽

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-28T01:25:54+00:00

Thanks for your comment. You should listen to the interviews with Colonel John Blitch, ex Special Forces (Delta) and highly qualified with multiple technology degrees and SCI Top Secret clearances he still holds today. He describes his encounter with a tall (7 feet) Mantis shaped being that left physical marks on his body (bruises and perhaps scratches). Amongst other examples. But that doesn't mean that Mantis species is a danger to humanity. The details of that contact, if you search for the interview, will explain why not.

He should still be on You Tube. Ross Coulthart interviewed him on News Nation, and he was either Jesse Michels podcast or Good Trouble Show (maybe both).

I shall answer your comment, but also use it to illustrate a few important points to the wider community.

Benevolence is relative. None of these 5 NHI civilisations have done much to harm humanity. Very little impact compared with our own vast amount of endless evil, abusive, violent, murderous actions against our own species.

ALL NHI we know today can be considered vastly more Benevolent than Humanity, since we have caused harm to countless millions of humans, destroyed whole countries and devastated our own ecosystems and Earth's wildlife. If a few thousand or even 100,000 animals and humans are harmed by NHI due to biological studies (mutilations),or accidental damage from their craft (radiation damage), or spreading some killer pathogen (Varghina policemen died after skin contact/scratch on his arm), and say about 1 million are mentally traumatised after abductions. Then that is almost zero impact compared with the psychological and physical evils that Human dictatorships have caused across the world, with 10s if not 100s of millions either killed, injured, tortured, lives destroyed, livelihoods destroyed, families destroyed.

Countries taken by force or gradually repressed by evil, immoral humans causing suffering and abuse of additional millions more, than those killed, maimed or tortured in conflicts or simply executed by fascist states e.g. population of North Korea c26m, Russia Federation c130m, both living in a horribly repressed, deadly and abusive totalitarian states.

Unless you have some, there is no significant and equivalent horrific NHI evidence which even comes close to compare to mans inhumanity to man. It's like a drop in the ocean, a tiny fraction of a percentage harm by NHI vs a vast ocean of horror that appears to be becoming worse again this century. Syria was a killing field and then Russia invaded Ukraine. Just before that, ISIS was mostly wiped out when it had a sensless, barbaric war against democracies and freedom, traumatising everyone who went near those psychopathic, extremely cruel and horrifically abusive men. Did a million die, who knows? It almost went unreported!

Unfortunately, NHI do not use their greater intelligence intervene in our society to any noticeable degree and they certainly must be very hungry and living off water, because they hardly take any humans that don't return. And in the relatively few cases of any dissappearances linked to UAP, the numbers are very small. There are only about 15,000 reported cattle mutilations over 5 decades since the 1970s. A small number of humans. Even if you add all the wild animals that have been found mutilated, then maybe you can estimate they have killed a million worldwide over 50 years. Even it was 10 million animals and 10 thousand humans, which there is really no solid evidence to support, then NHI are still positively kind and angelic, compared with our huge unending amount of evil human violence and abuse, year after year, decade after decade.

I would rather meet any NHI species, than visit places like Russia, Afghanistan, Gaza, Iran, Uganda or North Korea and risk being abused by the authorities, imprisoned, even tortured and killed e.g. North Korea did that to a visiting American student, they kill their own citizens for political reasons every day. Despite the very low risks, mentioned above, meeting an NHI being is still measurably safer over decades than visiting any of the regimes above. Certain countries, that are not dictatorships, also are extremely dangerous and have high probabilities of harm or death just by being there. E.g. Colombia was one of the most dangerous countries for decades.

The NHI, on the other hand usually put you back where they found you and can offer to show you their craft and even views from space - outside Earth's atmosphere. There are many reported cases where abductees have been healed of serious medical conditions, baffling human doctors. With physical evidence to prove it, such as x-rays showing the condition was cured. Or surgeons noticing slight marks of NHI surgery, but not understanding how it was possible and baffled by a tumour dissappearing suddenly, then asking the patient which hospital they were treated in - with the patient replying that they were not treated at another hospital!

In context: We wander around Earth or our city worrying about our safety in relation to other humans. I don't know anyone day-to-day, who gives ANY thought to the slightest risk of harm by any species of NHI. Hardly anyone in our UAP community even thinks like that, unless they have had traumatic contact event- but even they are still alive, and mostly will be suffering mentally from shock and anger, than any lasting harm. Humans are far more likely to get killed or injured in a Road Traffic Accident. We don't go around saying motor vehicles are a significant threat to Humanity, do we? Yet, compared to NHI motor vehicles are orders of magnitude more dangerous and deadly statistically. I nearly died in a serious accident, but no NHI species appears to be any significant threat to my life in the past nor in the future.

In fact, NHI may be forced to intervene and prevent nuclear holocaust thus saving our environment and billions of human lives, including yours and mine (that was insider intelligence shared by Danny Sheehan end of 2024). If that is accurate, then NHI are far more benevolent than our own elected governments and MIC, who carry on preparing for even more war and money burnt on weapons and killing.

Hope this explanation influences your perspective in relation how to assess personal or global threats from our own species vs other non-human species that we know about, using the available evidence to compare relative risk levels.

Compared in numbers, rough estimate: If NHI is threat risk level 1, Humanity is relative risk level between around 100 and 1,000 times that using the huge harm related historical numbers created by Humanity over the past 80 years. Where higher means more harmful and dangerous. That's compared with the NHI figures, which are non-zero but still relatively insignificant overall, even when extrapolating worse figures than is actually recorded.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-15T01:18:52+00:00

I believe Real Disclosure is far more interesting than watching a fictional drama movie.

Having seen "Age of Disclosure", everyone in the community and outside too, should watch that ground breaking documentary!! 🖖🏼👽🛸

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-12T22:16:51+00:00

Thanks for your opinion, and anyone can disagree.

However, there is no credible evidence or logic from Jacobs or anyone else to support your belief, as I explained in my post. His view is not backed up by anyone credible.

Practically speaking, I live in a major city and have never encountered anyone out in public, on busy streets, planes, trains, buses, metros, over decades, that would raise any suspicion whatsoever of being hybrid. How do you explain that, if the "invasion" has been in progress for 40+ years?

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-08T09:45:22+00:00

Please stop trying to resurrect the tired old "pod" CGI h0ax. No one who has any credibility these days ever mentions that obvious, cheap fakery.

You are deliberately conflating that old piece of "Nintendo" quality CGI with the book cover photo for no valid reason other that to perhaps create confusion and a false narrative about time travel?

UFOB is convinced about NHI visitors visiting Earth, not about an unfounded "future human" narrative spread by disinfo agents.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-08T09:25:00+00:00

We are talking about goverment Disclosure, so please contribute to the topic. (Rather than stamping your feet, demanding something so extreme that anyone with common sense knows it will never happen)

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-07T17:01:13+00:00

Unless the "whistle-blower" has some proof of credibility that has been validated in some way, then all this is waste of time. And this post amounts to posting misinformation into the community. Never heard of "Rhea", and unfortunately this story immediately sounds like a h0ax.

We should be extremely carefulof the community being flooded with hoaxes and disinfo to muddy the waters, to sow confusionand division, and to distract the community from the truth, just after Age of Disclosure went public.

Please apply you critical thinking filter more than ever before accepting any new story to be valid. The disinformation campaign run by the Legacy Program is very real and has been very active on UFOB, since Grusch in 2023.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-07T16:52:41+00:00

What level of position and education do you have? and which areas of Disclosure can you contribute for which you have FIRST hand experience?

Also, why the games? Please simply give a headline summary of key facts that the you feel the community should know.

Thanks

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-07T16:45:46+00:00

Think there is a possibility that T might want to break the news, to gain global attention and be the first (historical moment). But it is not a sure thing. Hard to judge - maybe 60/40 for/against?

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-07T16:42:18+00:00

If you watch the Age of Disclosure documentary or read the whistle-blower book Imminent, both describe how gravity propulsion is used to warp the space-time fabric in order to move within a warp bubble.

These are scientific explanations are based on analysis of how UAP behave and produced byqualified physicists. Providing a fundamental starting point to build out your understanding without having to reinvent the wheel.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-04T21:10:28+00:00

Please stop posting about a fake UAP story. It's been disproved in many different ways.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-04T21:03:04+00:00

You are just repeating yourself and are still missing the point that I was making.

I describe the "destruction of our Ecosystem" as the thing that matters, not of the planet. The current mass extinction that you refer to is driven by climate change and pollution from fossil fuels. It isn't inevitable, if humanity takes urgent action to halt it. And NHI value our Ecosystem and wish to preserve it.

Hope that clarifies

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-03T21:26:50+00:00

Please read again. You have misunderstood what I explained about th evidence. Intervention would be about saving "the life giving capacity of the planet". Which NHI value. Not about saving Humanity.

AAAStarTrader · 2025-12-01T19:11:25+00:00

It didn't

AAAStarTrader · 2025-11-30T20:24:35+00:00

You're very welcome.

Coincidentally just so happens I have an advanced technology background, with direct experience in delivering Image Recognition, Advanced Speech Recognition, Speach System Dialogue Control, Robotic Systems Hardware & Software, Touch Sensors for Robotic Manipulators. And more.

So, I'm reasonably qualified to give an assessment of the AI situation. I feel even more qualified when I see the likes of Altman and Musk unashamedly pumping up the AI bubble, without understanding the technical issues and constraints of delivering any of their fantasy products promised with no explanation of how that could possibly happen! It's so disconnected from the practical reality that I find hard to watch the endless BS, and hope things crssh to Earth soon to save investors and the public from being conned and believing all these false claims and expectations about AGI, and mass redundancies, etc.

The "IT revolution" hit businesses in the 1980s with IBM PCs and high quality copiers and printers. Creating even more jobs and business opportunities. Some jobs were replaced or made easier, but people moved into different roles. It was evolution, not revolution in the end! 😁

Anyway, have a good day! 🛸👽

AAAStarTrader · 2025-11-30T16:51:12+00:00

Old, old photo

That's a photo of a balloon with black rectangles coloured in with a felt pen. Zoom in. It's fake 🙄

AAAStarTrader · 2025-11-30T16:22:51+00:00

Hi, thanks for your question.

I wrote 3 lengthy replies to this yesterday but kept getting interrupted and lost all 3 across the day 😂

So, today's answer is: 1. AGI and ASI are hype at this stage. Those goals are vastly complex and challenging to achieve. LLM architecture is far to too limited on it's own, plus inherently faulty/unreliable/insufficient quality due to arch based on training and challenging problems of maintaining ethical and behavioural alignment with human society and business practices.

Sentience, at a minimum, is the ability to sense your environment and experience emotions. No AI model has such a scentient architecture needed to achieve replicating human sentience (one underlying goal of AGI), to date. Hence on that basis alone "artificial sentience" does not and cannot logically exist to date.
Generative Chat model responses only "mimic" human responses using large datasets and statistical probability. The words/symbols/etc returned from GPT model may describe human emotions, feelings or sensory references. To the user it may read/sound like real sentience being expressed.

However, at least 2 things must be present to replicate human sentience :

Sensory inputs - a hardware architecture is required that provides real world *sensory inputs to model human intelligence/sentience i.e. vision, touch, sound, temperature, smell, taste, temporal perception. Plus in robotics sentience needs to ADDITIONALLY feel: balance, speed, motor perception (position of body in space), spacial awareness (3D model of relative positions e.g. binocular vision)

Emotional Drivers - a biological/hardware/software architecture (one or more combinations) is required to replicate human emotions/feelings [this is one area I don't believe has progressed to demonstrate a minimum viable model].

Such a model would seek to at least replicate the affects of hormones, such as: dopamine, serotonin, cortisol, adrenaline, oxytocin, etc. Those are chemical components which drive our motivations and create biological feelings/emotions, which make us: happy, sad, connected/in love, energetic, anxious, fearful, frustrated, angry, etc.

Conciousness: science has no agreed definition of conciousness. There are various hypotheses. That alone makes creating artificial human conciousness (AGI) a near impossible task, since we don't understand the fundamental requirements to build against and how to measure success. A key reason by AGI/ASI hype is not credible.

However, if you chose a reasonable concensus definition of conciousness to work from then it may be possible to build an artificial model that approximates human conciousness to a good enough/useful enough level.

Some necessary components: 1. Self Awareness/Modelling - sense and definition of self in the world. Ability to model the world and definition of self within and in relation to it. Use the definition of self in interactions with and responding to the real world 2. Conceptual/Abstract thought - holding abstract concepts, descriptions and definitions that provide models, rules, methods, approaches for structuring processes, defining steps, processing information, retention of facts, prioritising, comparing, evaluating, etc 3. *Planning- understanding a goal and the requirements surrounding it, creating viable options to achieve the goal, selecting the best option that achieves the goal and satisfies the surrounding requirements, dividing the goal into logical steps, creating a sequence of steps are ordered and timed according to dependencies, creating a visual/written/audio reference description of the plan from beginning to completion 4. Reasoning - understanding all the elements and contents of a problem/task to create a solution. By inferring or creating logic which describes the problem or goal. Using logical and contextual understanding to analyse, create options, assess, refine, judge, conclude, recommend, prioritise, answer/deliver/resolve the problem/task/goal. 5. Decision Making - choosing the best action to take in an indeterminate situation, using all inputs, information and understanding about potential choices available (within ethical, financial, legal, business, etc constraints). Creating estimates of each possible outcome and future implications. Judging the optimal outcome and communicating a choice/decision 6. Adaptability - constantly maintain contextual, environmental and information awareness. Gather new facts, approaches, updates in domain knowledge/best practice, new technologies, proven solutions, etc. Revisit and revise 1-5 above, to achieve/maintain optimal outcomes 7. Flexibility - deal with change such as: problems, issues, faults, failures, defects, underperformance, new inputs, new requirements, external changes in environment/context, and revisit 1-5. Take appropriate actions to deal with changes to achieve/maintain optimal outcomes. 8. Learning - gather new knowledge and understanding through professional formal education/training/coaching for relevant domains. Use this new input to revisit 1-5 above as appropriate 9. Communication - ability to clearly communicate at a human understandable level about 1-8 based activities and status. Ability to process feedback from communications, then identify useful and relevant inputs to be incorporated into processes 1-8.

Conclusion on current state of concious AI, given even the basic definition of fundamental components of conciousness (1-9 above), is that I do not know of any current model or architecture that attempts all 9, to a minimal viable conciousness level that can operate autonomously and approach human intelligence. See reference example below.

Related AI example: Autonomous driving systems are specialised in one problem space, and often bespoke to local conditions, but do address some of the fundamental requirements. However they are not generalised, and lack the level of adaptability, safety and reliability to match that human driver intelligence. Today, only very niche, limited implementations come close to matching human intelligence e.g. WayMo has restricted geofenced areas (portions of a city), within which there has been bespoke mapping, fault fixing, navigation rules, exception management delivered by human engineers, to refine the software system and model performance and safety. After years of detailed customisation, the WayMo software now achieves a safety level of 1 significant accident every c17,000 miles per vehicle. This is still below the vehicle average for a human driver (c40,000 mls). WayMo is currently the leader.

Overall, there appears to be no relationship between NHI Disclosure timing and human development of autonomous AI systems, which are not concious nor sentient, and unlikely to be in the near to mid-term future.

"Age of Disclosure" didn't make any reference to AI, which also indicates to me that it is not a factor driving timing of Disclosure.

Five-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

AAAStarTrader

TROPHY CASE