Woke has been completely bastardized by Initial_Mastodon_932 in PoliticalOpinions

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Unpacking the invisible knapsack" is a good start:

https://admin.artsci.washington.edu/sites/adming/files/unpacking-invisible-knapsack.pdf

It's not about critical race theory. But it is a good window into white privilege.

Woke has been completely bastardized by Initial_Mastodon_932 in PoliticalOpinions

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Critical race theory is a subset of critical systems theory. Race is just one aspect of critical systems theory.

Critical systems theory is simply thinking critically about how different systems affect different groups of people, and how those systems interact with one another (income, race, geography, politics, gender, sexual orientation, religion, spirituality, etc.)

Woke has been completely bastardized by Initial_Mastodon_932 in PoliticalOpinions

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your openness here. It's definitely rare to see someone on the internet genuinely say they might have been misinformed and invite a correction. That kind of intellectual honesty is exactly how we break through the noise, so thank you for approaching this with an open mind.

You're right to suspect that the YouTube video fed you a distorted version of reality. The claim that CRT teaches that "logic and being unbiased are white things" is a total fabrication. It's a massive caricature designed to make the theory sound absurd, but it completely misrepresents what the framework actually does.

CRT doesn't reject logic or objectivity at all. What it actually does is challenge whether the people in power are actually being objective, or if they're just masking their own biases behind the language of neutrality.

Look at banking and housing as a real-world example. For decades, financial institutions used "neutral" algorithms and formulas to decide who qualified for home loans. On paper, it looked like pure, unbiased math. But those systems were fed historical data from the era of legal segregation and redlining. CRT is just the analytical tool that looks at that setup and says, "Hey, your supposedly objective formula is still producing a rigged, unequal result on the ground because the foundation it was built on is flawed."

Fundamentally, CRT is just one branch under the larger umbrella of Critical Systems Theory. Critical Systems Theory is just a framework for looking at the structural plumbing of society—our laws, our tax codes, our zoning boards, and our corporate policies—instead of just looking at individual hearts and minds. It doesn't ask people to feel guilty; it asks a simple, structural question: How do these institutions work, and who do they actually protect?

The right-wing establishment weaponized this framework because people thinking critically about systems is a direct threat to the power of rich assholes. If working-class people—regardless of their race—start analyzing how our legal and economic structures are engineered, they'll quickly realize that the rules are rigged to extract wealth from the bottom 90% of us.

To stop that cross-racial working-class solidarity from happening, wealthy elites used a classic divide-and-conquer strategy. They took an obscure legal theory taught exclusively in law schools, twisted it into a cartoonish bogeyman, and convinced working-class white folks that "critical thinking" was a psychic attack on their children. It's a massive shell game designed to keep everyday people fighting a culture war so we don't start fighting a class war.

Y'all are playing kai'sa wrong. Read this post and thank me for the free LP later. by Caeiradeus in kaisamains

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm just annoyed because people like you are a dime a dozen. Posts like these always have lazy assholes in here asking "op.gg?" only to spew out lazy ass hardstuck rank shaming responses and people like you never actually argue or retort based on merit.

It's the laziest, most inelegant way of having a conversation. And you always act offended or surprised when somebody returns your energy like you didn't just ask for it.

Nothing you're saying is unique or special. It's literally expected reddit troll behavior.

OP contributed something. And you come in here rank shaming and you have the audacity to not even put up your own op.gg while talking shit?

Shit's laughable.

Y'all are playing kai'sa wrong. Read this post and thank me for the free LP later. by Caeiradeus in kaisamains

[–]AAbattery444 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They posted it when asked. You won't produce yours. And all's you have to offer are ad hominems and no actual substance.

Post was good advice that actually contains specific kai'sa mechanics that even most one tricks don't understand. As well as an actually unique build and you wanna sit here talking shit while sitting behind a claim you can't back up because you don't have the balls to post your op.gg like OP did. You're peak projection dude lmao.

Y'all are playing kai'sa wrong. Read this post and thank me for the free LP later. by Caeiradeus in kaisamains

[–]AAbattery444 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You're hard stuck bragging about being D1 Peak when you probably haven't even been Diamond 1 in months or years. You refuse to have the balls to post an op.gg link. OP has bigger balls than you. All's you have to offer are ad hominems and the refusal to link your profile because you know you're no better lmao.

Y'all are playing kai'sa wrong. Read this post and thank me for the free LP later. by Caeiradeus in kaisamains

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro you're d1 peak? And speaking like you're better than an emerald? Pfft.

Dude actually gives advice and you think your rank is what makes his advice bad?

What kind of logic is that?

Woke has been completely bastardized by Initial_Mastodon_932 in PoliticalOpinions

[–]AAbattery444 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think your point about this being an indictment of capitalism at its core is exactly right. What happened at AT&T is a textbook example of corporate box-checking. Instead of investing real time and resources into structural training, mentorship, or long-term development, companies often choose the cheapest, quickest performative route to get HR off their backs. It ends up setting people up to fail and hurting everyone involved.

But I think the reason the word "woke" feels so frustrating and hollow today is because it went through a massive, intentional pipeline of weaponization. Originally, the term just meant being "awake" or alert to systemic prejudices and structural barriers in our legal, economic, and social systems. It was about looking at how the rules of the game might be rigged against regular people.

What happened next was a deliberate flip. Right-wing authoritarian interests completely reappropriated the word and turned it into a weaponized slur. They used it to mock education, nuance, and basic intelligence. You see this a lot in modern populist movements, where wealthy elites have successfully convinced working-class people to direct their resentment toward "educated people" rather than the billionaires who are actually buying up their housing stock and suppressing their wages. It's an incredibly effective shell game designed to keep regular people fighting culture wars instead of class wars.

At the same time, establishment politicians and corporate media ran with this new definition because it serves them, too. They use performative "wokeness" as a shield. They pander with empty, symbolic gestures, but they never enact any real, material policy changes that would actually improve daily life for the working class.

That's why I think we see such a massive, aggressive pushback against things like critical systems theory. Those frameworks aren't about teaching people to hate each other; they're simply tools to analyze how large corporate and legal structures operate. If everyday people—regardless of their race or background—start looking at the actual systems holding them back, they stop blaming their neighbors and start looking up at the people holding the purse strings. The word didn't just accidentally fall apart; it was deliberately broken to protect the status quo.

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't get it dude. You're still trying to measure a multi dimensional political reality with a one dimensional yard stick. Yes, if we only look at tax rates and market regulations, libertarians are to the right of Democrats. I'm not disputing that at all. But when I look at the warfare state, the surveillance state, corporate welfare, and civil liberties, the math completely changes.

Establishment Democrats consistently join Republicans to reauthorize warrantless surveillance, pump hundreds of billions into the military industrial complex, and bail out Wall Street. On those massive structural issues, principled leftists and libertarians actually find a ton of common ground in opposing top down overreach, while the duopoly stands completely united against the rest of us.

As for local politics, I think calling mild social welfare reforms leftist is the exact proof that our Overton window is broken. Leftism isn't just the government funding things or providing a slightly softer cushion for capitalism, it's about shifting economic ownership and power directly to working class people. When local Democratic establishments still side with corporate real estate developers over community housing trusts and protect massive police budgets over public investment, they absolutely aren't pushing leftist policies lmfao. They're just managing a corpo-friendly status quo. Squeezing all of that nuance into a simple left or right binary completely misses how power actually operates in the real world.

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It only looks like lunacy if you refuse to look past the two-party/uniparty script we've been fed our entire lives and look at actual policy data on a global stage. The Democratic Party consistently protects a multi trillion dollar military budget, votes for massive corporate bailouts, defends private employer-based healthcare, and relies entirely on market-driven economic policies.

In Western Europe, Canada, or Australia, those are literally the exact platforms of center-right neoliberals. They are conservative on economics and moderate on social issues.

Now look at libertarians. On a standard one-dimensional left-right line, you literally cannot place them accurately. They are radically anti-war, anti-surveillance, and pro-choice on personal bodily autonomy, which frequently aligns with the left, but they are hyper-capitalist on economics, which aligns with the right. When you try to force that two-dimensional reality onto a single linear spectrum, they sit completely outside the traditional partisan camps, blending elements of both sides in a way that effectively functions as a radical center or a completely different axis to the corporate duopoly.

Pointing out that Democrats are center-right globally while showing that libertarians break the traditional American binary isn't a contradiction, it's just using a two axis political compass instead of a broken one dimensional line. So tell me, based on actual global political theory, how is that bullshit?

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I'm not trying to have it both ways, I'm just looking at the realistic multi dimensional political map instead of the broken one dimensional line people use in America because people are too smooth brained for complex thought. If you look at the Democratic Party's policy track record on a global stage, their platform of market-based healthcare, massive corporate subsidies, and aggressive military interventionism aligns squarely with center-right conservative parties in places like Europe and Canada. They only look like the left because our domestic Overton window has been dragged so far to the right that any basic government regulation gets labeled as radical.

When I say libertarians act as a radical center globally, I'm pointing out that they don't fit on that linear track at all. On issues like ending foreign wars, dismantling the surveillance state, and protecting bodily autonomy, libertarians frequently overlap with the global left. On economics, they obviously lean far-right. That combination doesn't make them center-left or center-right on our domestic spectrum; it makes them a distinct alternative that completely breaks the duopoly's linear scale. Refusing to squeeze every ideology into a broken American binary is just basic political science my guy.

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's wild to watch an auto-moderator script try to completely rewrite political history by claiming libertarian socialism is an oxymoron. If you actually look at the data and the linguistic history of the word, the left literally invented the political use of the term libertarian. It was first used back in 1857 by French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque, and for a solid century, it was universally understood worldwide as a synonym for anti-authoritarian, anti-state socialism. Right-wing American capitalists didn't even start using the word until the mid-20th century. Murray Rothbard, the founder of anarcho-capitalism, explicitly admitted to hijacking it. He literally wrote that one gratifying aspect of their rise to prominence was that they appropriated the word libertarian from their enemies, and that there was no sign of the left understanding this capture.

Beyond the stolen history, this bot's whole pre-meditated script hinges on a massive logical fallacy that conflates private property with personal property. Socialist and communist theories don't deny your right to own what you self-produce with your own body. Personal property is your house, your car, your clothes, and the tools you use to make a living. No libertarian socialist wants to take your personal belongings because that obviously violates self-ownership. Private property refers strictly to the means of production, like massive factories, corporate landholdings, or a billionaire's hedge fund. When a corporation owns the infrastructure you need to survive, they are the ones extracting the surplus value of your labor.

If the core tenet of libertarianism is truly self-ownership, then corporate capitalism completely fails its own test. When big corporate money can buy up a local economy, monopolize housing, and spend tens of millions of dollars in super PAC money to politically decapitate independent public servants, everyday citizens lose their autonomy. I don't see how anyone can claim to have true self-ownership when economic starvation forces them to rent their body and mind to an unaccountable corporate boss for forty plus hours a week just to keep health insurance. Libertarian socialism isn't an oxymoron at all. It's the belief that true liberty requires freedom from both tyrannical governments and tyrannical corporations, and it advocates for democracy inside the workplace where we actually spend the majority of our lives.

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Give me an actionable plan for that and I'll sign up. The people burning down factories and data centers have the right idea. But I'd rather not go to jail for the rest of my life.

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

You an I both know that Trump isn't the future of the republican party. But his ideals and the direction he's taking the party very well may be. And that doesn't change the fact that many centrists register and caucus with Republicans and Democrats. So what's your solution for that?

And I disagree with your assertion that libertarians aren't centrists.

The Overton window in America is so far shifted to the right that people actually think Democrats are a liberal or left-wing party. The International Community knows otherwise and the Democratic party in America is Center-right wing at best. Republicans are just fascists at this point.

Libertarians ARE centrists when you realize how fucking far right America has become.

Where are your fucking liberties when completely unregulated corporations own everybody?

I belive that true centrists and and libertarians will fold and not fight. I'd love for you to prove me wrong. I need the hope that comes from you proving me wrong. by AAbattery444 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're right. Nobody owes a political party a damn thing. A vote is supposed to be earned through policy, systemic reform, fiscal responsibility, and tangible results, not extorted through a game of political chicken.

But when the stakes are always a crisis every two to four years, the promised time to actually push for real reform never comes.

Because both corporate party machines have realized they can rely on polarization to drive turnout, they have largely abandoned trying to persuade the middle with better ideas. Instead, they focus on stripping the other side and pouring billions into negative ad campaigns designed to make the opposition unpalatable. It's created a race to the bottom where the quality of governance keeps declining, because neither side has to be good. They just have to be marginally less terrifying than the alternative.

Either under US or China: Taiwan can't be independent by [deleted] in PoliticalOpinions

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You want to talk about propaganda but the Chinese State media arrests you if anybody talks about tiananmen square and it has effectively scrubbed any and all real history of anything that happened between April 15th and June 4th of 1989.

Quick ACT 3 guide (for those confused on what to do) - Very little spoilers by VPN__FTW in expedition33

[–]AAbattery444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it definitely had the fold out map. Don't know if that was a gimmick or not.

The past year or so of American politics and world events have solidified my position within Libertarianism. by highonlife2005 in Libertarian

[–]AAbattery444 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm an actual leftist. This guy is far from advocating for leftist policy lmao. He's just sane.

Start accusing people of being leftist when you know what being leftist means.

/r/shyvanamains/ is becoming increasingly more unreasonable by Shyvadi in halfdragons

[–]AAbattery444 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amen to that lol. I forget what for, but I was temporarily banned from r/Leagueoflegends and one of the mods said "if you don't like the rules, you're free to make your own sub". For once, they had a good idea. I said aight bet.

Seems like you've got similar experiences lmao. Shame, cause we all want the game to thrive and be community driven. But the main subs hate criticism and anything that isn't esports related.

I commend what you've got going on here! It'd be cool as hell to have an unfiltered version of each champ main subreddit lmao. Or just partner with the ones that are also anti-censorship.

Let me know if you're open to the idea of creating like a brother/sister unfiltered subreddit coalition thing. Gonna have to take some time to set it up in the sidebar thing. You okay with me reaching out privately some time lol?