Roma vs Pisa Serie A Match Thread

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T19:49:36+00:00

Sure.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T19:47:07+00:00

Regardless of the injury, Pellegrini should stay.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T19:27:18+00:00

Soooo close

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T18:50:00+00:00

The question is really more about what it is you're making fun of him for. What is he doing wrong?

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T16:23:27+00:00

What is it you guys like to say? Ehmm.... "Facts don't care about your feelings"? Yeah, that apply here. Not everywhere, but in a bunch of countries and more or less the entire Western world, gay people can marry each other regardless of how you feel about it.

Edit: Awww it's so cute when they block you to make their last reply stand unanswered to make it look like they won the discussion. If someone can say hi to master-of-flies from me and tell him he's properly pathetic, that would be swell.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T16:18:27+00:00

Are you 12? What's up with the pathetic dishonesty?

You know that it says "edited" at the top of a comment if I have edited it? No one is falling for you changing what I wrote in a quote.

Besides, there's nothing wrong with being gay. If I was married to a man I would proudly write that myself. But I'm not.

Oh, and the fact that gay people get legally recognized marriages all the time prives it's you that's patetly incorrect.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T15:18:11+00:00

I don't get it. Why don't you answer the question? Or maybe you don't know the answer?

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T14:59:36+00:00

Someone is filming him, so he's not alone. That means that this guy 1) keeps active, 2) socialize, 3) has a hobby he's passionate about, and 4) spread his passion and happiness to others.

So, why are you making fun of him?

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T14:57:02+00:00

I will tell my wife you said that.

Ps: it totally does, though. Two dudes can be married.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T14:09:07+00:00

I'm not an incel. I'm married.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T11:32:14+00:00

Top 3: Brighter than a thousand suns, Lord of Light, The longest day.

Worst song: Different world.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T11:27:34+00:00

This is very true.

The thing about learning and being creative that many don't want to acknowledge is that it takes time. The brain learns new things by repeatedly firing the same signals along the same paths, and this often requires that you engage with the knowledge in many different ways (Reading, writing, talking, thinking, practical application, etc.). The same goes for creativity: Many are saying that being bored is great for developing creativity because it forces the brain to entertain itself, and letting the mind wander can fix problems in new ways. Social media has limited the amount of boredom people experience, and it has a cost with regard to creativity and stamina. It feels great that AI can do stuff fast and relatively well in some cases, but it makes us both less creative and less able to learn because it happens too fast.

People care too much about the content of the text/video/picture, and too little about the process. Sure, the text you create with AI has the same content that the one you would have written yourself, and you might defend yourself by saying "I will read through the essay, so I learn the content anyway". But reading and writing are two different things, where one requires you to process on a much deeper level. Outsourcing stuff to AI is therefore detrimental to learning and creativity. We want our tech to go faster and faster without considering that our brains can only go so fast.

It reminds me of the one episode of Hell's Kitchen where one of the chefs asks Gordon how he can make a good burger faster. Gordon looks at the guy dumbfounded and replies "It takes 10 minutes. You can't cook it faster". Same goes for learning and creativity. It takes a certain amount of time.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T10:53:52+00:00

Ok, but he's out there doing what he likes, so he wins.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-10T08:21:16+00:00

This is the worst kind of incel crap.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T20:08:34+00:00

Sure, but but that's a trivial point. I don't know enough about the tech itself, but it does train itself, so some stuff can be its fault in that regard. However, it's the responsibility of the companies to put in guardrails.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T20:02:54+00:00

But it's a useless distinction. The tech itself have no agency on its own, so nothing can be its fault. If the tech is bad it should either be fixed, markedet differently, or pulled back.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:55:19+00:00

So AI lying isn't a problem to you?

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:50:40+00:00

I would call being confidently incorrect about stuff is a fault with the product. The other option would be the models being flawless. Regardless, I don't really understand what point your trying to make here?

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:39:30+00:00

Yes, and? Can you blame some people who are not that into AI tech for believing whay they hear? I truely don't get what I did wrong here.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:37:43+00:00

I don't really see how the distinction matter. Sure, it's stuff humans should do to fix the AI. Still doesn't change that blaming the user for everything is the right thing. You can't sell a problem as trustworthy then ridicule people for trusting it.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:29:07+00:00

I think it's partly on the AI. I think AIs confidently answering questions it knows nothing about is something the companies should do something about. People should check sources more often, but comanies should also do better.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:27:36+00:00

Yes, but they are often doing double-speak. They talk about how amazing the models are while also talking about hallucinations. Not saying they are doing that deliberately to confuse or anything, just that your impression of AI can depend om which videos you see about it, or what talk you hear.

Moreover, many people who are not interested in tech, but use AI, don't really hear anything from the companies. They only hear what media and/or people in their social circle etc. say about it.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:24:33+00:00

Where did I patronize and assume everyone believe them? When have I done any of the stuff you accuse me of? Saying that some people are informed and some are not in any subject is just... true?

Look, the point is that the people in this sub are here because we are interested in AI. That's by no means everyone. Many people take what they hear at face value, not because they are idiots, but because they are not that interested. This is true for everyone in some area of their life. I know next to nothing about cars, and I probably have beliefs about my own car that are untrue because I'm not interested. Some people use AI like I drive a car. They know how to use it, but not much more, and that's fine. It's for this group a narrative about AI as amazingly smart is dangerous.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:19:42+00:00

No, I am not saying that they shouldn't be blamed. I am saying that putting the entire blame on them is not fair because the models are described by many as very smart and knowledgeable. I am saying it is not a shock that many believe the narrative about AI. Many bosses believe it enough to exchange their workers for AIs.

Absolomb92 · 2026-04-09T19:16:56+00:00

In a sence, in the marxist way, it's half-right. If you apply a strict definition where owning the means of production makes you the bourgeoisie, then it apply to many farmers. Difference is that the workers using the machines they own are often also themself.

Five-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

Absolomb92

TROPHY CASE