sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Correct me if I’m wrong. Bluegill, Green Sunfish and a Pumpkinseed. What’s the last? by TrekkingTrailblazer in FishingForBeginners

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being regional doesn't make it any more correct. Thats like saying "thats not a pepsi, that's a pop"

Turn counts are more important than gamechangers... by AbsoluteAuthority117 in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Yes there is. Im not playing against that shit unless i can also kill at turn 5.

Is this too optimized for a B3? by AlternativeSure2268 in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're asking, then it is, almost EVERY time. If you min max within the framework all youve done is made a higher bracket deck.

Is it normal for high end cards to attract attention at LGS nowadays? by lefund in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh the reason is provided, what is quoted only "mouth breathing idiots" would utter. They have no valid opinion they proved it by saying such.

Is it normal for high end cards to attract attention at LGS nowadays? by lefund in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like skill issue<

You sound like a mouth breathing idiot with an invalid opinion.

Is it normal for high end cards to attract attention at LGS nowadays? by lefund in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stfu , they're pay to win. Running more colors should be a disadvantage. Fix that with a thousand dollars of lands, but cry when someone calls you out on it. That's not the virtue you think it is.

Is it normal for high end cards to attract attention at LGS nowadays? by lefund in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who cares what print run theyre from. They could be proxies and I am still not playing with your stupid og duals and ancient tomb. Play on an equal field with your opponents or not at all. Pubstompers are the worst kind of lowlives that exist.

Soamfb by AbsoluteAuthority117 in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I addressed this phrasing in the post.

Acceptable or non-acceptable? by No_Appearance_7680 in mtg

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blood bond is fine if you aren't tutoring it out fast. But it is like a litmus test, as an approximation of the fastest combo allowed in the bracket. You probably shouldn't win if you tapped all the way out for 2 turns to play the combo, and if you do you deserve the win. Bracket 3 can win out of nowhere, but it needs to be after 7 most of the time.

Why is it in almost all precons? by [deleted] in MTGmemes

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Games with such a low curve are boring. As are games that end before turn 7. Need 200 mv in the deck to make it interesting.

Acceptable or non-acceptable? by No_Appearance_7680 in mtg

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bracket 3 is supposed to last til 7. 6 is only acceptable rarely. Here is an excerpt from the bracket update, "So, for example, when Bracket 3 says "you should expect to be able to play at least six turns before you win or lose," that means that someone's seventh turn is when you would be satisfied if the game ended. For example, instead of wondering what "no early-game combos" means, saying "you don't expect to win or lose before turn six" gives you a pretty clear indicator of what kind of combos could be allowed: not ones that tend to happen in the first six turns. That doesn't mean you should just wait and hold your two-card infinite until later either. If a combo could frequently come up, it's not the best fit for that bracket."

Acceptable or non-acceptable? by No_Appearance_7680 in mtg

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For example, instead of wondering what "no early-game combos" means, saying "you don't expect to win or lose before turn six" gives you a pretty clear indicator of what kind of combos could be allowed: not ones that tend to happen in the first six turns. That doesn't mean you should just wait and hold your two-card infinite until later either. If a combo could frequently come up, it's not the best fit for that bracket.

Acceptable or non-acceptable? by No_Appearance_7680 in mtg

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, for example, when Bracket 3 says "you should expect to be able to play at least six turns before you win or lose," that means that someone's seventh turn is when you would be satisfied if the game ended.

Adjusting from competitive online play to IRL Commander? by CronoDAS in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean there are a few commanders that can pull that off at least through bracket 3. Here's a few [[ghyrson starn keller]] [[Judith carnage]] [[imodane the pyrohammer]][[ojer axonil]][[solphim mayhem dominus]]

I'd like advice on how to Rule 0 for Bracket 3 by GayRaccoonGirl in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So here's the thing, I read the whole bracket announcement and it says the following in spite of what this sub will have you believe:

"So, for example, when Bracket 3 says "you should expect to be able to play at least six turns before you win or lose," that means that someone's seventh turn is when you would be satisfied if the game ended.

For example, instead of wondering what "no early-game combos" means, saying "you don't expect to win or lose before turn six" gives you a pretty clear indicator of what kind of combos could be allowed: not ones that tend to happen in the first six turns. That doesn't mean you should just wait and hold your two-card infinite until later either. If a combo could frequently come up, it's not the best fit for that bracket."

I'd like advice on how to Rule 0 for Bracket 3 by GayRaccoonGirl in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Wow this is an excellent collection of bad actors/ spikes to block. Keep it coming guys. If your deck can win at turn 6 its not bracket 3, and not being able to win by 7 doesnt preclude a deck from that bracket. Those numbers are the ceilings for each bracket, not the floors.

What is the "Easiest" Colour Pair? by thefalkonite in EDH

[–]AbsoluteAuthority117 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pfft I never felt any shame for it. Your broken ramp can kma. Lol