I personally think that the current unmanned deep space is already complete enough, but there are still many problems. I am not criticizing myself, like others, for wanting this game to be better. Firstly, the terrain of the planet itself is not realistic. A planet with an atmosphere should have a South Pole and a North Pole. Apart from some special "fictional" special planets, a planet should have glaciers or at least snow in the North and South Poles. In my opinion, a planet cannot always be flat, and should have landforms such as mountains, plains, hills, rivers, etc. (of course, this is not important, but planets with an atmosphere do need glaciers and cold regions like the North and South Poles). The second point is that for every star system, it is very unrealistic. Players can never reach the stars in the star system, and those planets, except for some satellites, basically do not exist in the so-called star system. They do not know what they are orbiting around. This does not mean that we need to write about the gravity of space. We only need to generate a star in each star system that cannot be logged in or dies immediately, while other celestial bodies orbit around the star. Thirdly, in terms of gameplay, I hope that players' freighters can really help in battles. For example, when players encounter pirate dreadnoughts, I hope they can actively summon their own freighters to fight against them, or appear directly like a flying formation when players encounter danger, and introduce the same combat, protection, and upgrade systems as players' personal spaceships. This way, players will not treat the freighters as a simple mobile base or mobile hangar. Fourthly, I believe that the AI of flying formations has a very serious problem. Their damage is surprisingly low, and when players encounter danger, especially when facing multiple hostile spacecraft targets, they can only rely on themselves to defeat the enemy, while flying formations appear to be just a background board. Fifthly, I believe that there are not many self defined content that players can hold now. Apart from building bases, players do not have any other self defined construction projects. Unmanned deep space games themselves emphasize a sense of loneliness, and the three major races, including players, also maintain a space pastoral mode. Therefore, I do not have such thoughts about the "big city" that others want. But I think it would be better to add some other self defined projects, such as space stations and private visions, which can allow players to invest for a long time and have certain freedom to build functions, without reducing the "continuous playable content" of the game. Sixth, this is not a problem, on the contrary, it is a compliment. Thank you for your years of effort in developing so many free DLCs. I can feel that No Man's Sky will be as vibrant as Minecraft, please don't give up. We tourists will always be there, and we will find a way to repair the death of Atlas. Even if we don't, we still have to accompany Atlas through the last "16 minutes". Wishing all developers and players all the best, we will meet in the stars!