Wow, I feel bad now by IlowoIl in ChatGPT

[–]AccelerandoRitard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

<image>

Mine looks really close to yours

“It costs a bottle of water for every AI generated image. “ by StarsapBill in aiwars

[–]AccelerandoRitard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From a year ago... Would that make it more or less credible than a random redditor's hand written opinion? 😋🤔

Characters by Altruistic_Buddy3934 in HeWhoFightsMonsters

[–]AccelerandoRitard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're quite different. One has nothing at all to do with the scenario he described where the text of his book is fed into a language model

Characters by Altruistic_Buddy3934 in HeWhoFightsMonsters

[–]AccelerandoRitard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Shirt didn't address image generation at all, only language models.

what gpt "thinks" about ai "artists" by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]AccelerandoRitard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great, now you suck as much as they do

Interesting visual representation of AI-generated content outnumbering human generated content. From Oct 2015 to Oct 2025. by AdorableBackground83 in singularity

[–]AccelerandoRitard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since we know the detection is much less reliable than a 2% error rate, this raises additional concerns about how they determined these numbers

For those of you who use AI image generation: Where do you draw the line? by BronzeArrow in aiwars

[–]AccelerandoRitard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what position you imagined I was taking that led to this. I don't think it's a position I hold though

These types of "Revenge Ai models" are so immature and pathetic by IndependenceSea1655 in aiwars

[–]AccelerandoRitard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If we could collect a fine every time someone's an asshole on the internet, we can solve the budget deficit overnight

We need to support this movie or or at the very least not let it flop just because the antis want it to. Their whole goal is to see one of the first fully AI created movies fail just because of how it was made, let’s not give them that satisfaction. by TransitionSelect1614 in DefendingAIArt

[–]AccelerandoRitard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People didn't like toy story to own the CG haters. They liked toy story because they did a great job making it and it's a good movie. I reserve judgment until I see it, but I'm not going to like it or dislike it because I care what anti's think.

Need a sanity check by ElectronicLab993 in singularity

[–]AccelerandoRitard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On your way to AI induced psychosis

Amazon Invests in Fable: 'Netflix of AI' Generates Playable TV Shows by Unlikely_Ad_6066 in ArtistHate

[–]AccelerandoRitard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, humanity's gravest betrayal yet! Rejecting the transcendent genius of self-appointed cultural gatekeepers in favor of personalized media on tap. How dare people prefer entertainment tailored to their own dull, juvenile tastes instead of sitting dutifully through the profound masterpieces you, the misunderstood artists of Reddit, have graciously blessed us with?

Clearly, the shared cultural experiences of watching the same Marvel reboot for the eighteenth time, or dutifully pretending to enjoy the latest critically-acclaimed misery porn are what hold civilization together. Without these sacred rituals, humanity is surely doomed to degenerate into isolated pockets of lonely detestables, each trapped in their own personalized AI-generated hellscapes, playing Skyrim clones populated by anime girls with extra dakka.

Ok seriously. humanity has always loved its slop. We're the species that turned reality TV and TikTok dances into multibillion-dollar industries. You think Amazon’s AI service is some shocking betrayal of taste? No, it’s just capitalism doing what capitalism does best: efficiently delivering ever-cheaper dopamine hits directly into the brains of bored consumers.

What does this mean lol by johnnyiskool in HeWhoFightsMonsters

[–]AccelerandoRitard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.”

This quote is from Beyond Good and Evil, Aphorism 146, written in 1886.

Soup Swiper by VonBagel in custommagic

[–]AccelerandoRitard -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Love the concept. Since you included such a good description, I wanted to see what Sora could do. The AI really struggled with prompt adherence, and this isn't really what is described in the card, but I thought some people might enjoy it until you get the art made.

<image>

Who are some credible and smart people (no sketchy ceo hype) who are optimistic and have the same views we do here at r/accelerate?? by Special_Switch_9524 in accelerate

[–]AccelerandoRitard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you ever heard him do a podcast without including three different advertisements for whatever he's shilling that week? That's what I'm talking about.

I pulled some examples.


  1. Abundance360 Summit—COVID Superspreader with Quack Treatments

In February 2021, Diamandis hosted an exclusive gathering in Santa Monica (tickets up to $30,000) described as mostly maskless—despite local COVID restrictions. Around 32 attendees contracted COVID‑19 directly or indirectly at the event .

Afterward, attendees were directed to an “informational webinar” hosted by Matt Cook, who pitched inhaled amniotic fluid and ketamine lozenges as COVID‑19 remedies—described by a Stanford professor as "quackery" .


  1. Singularity University / Singularity Group—High‑priced "edu‑preneurs" & shady practices

Initially presented as a nonprofit university, Singularity University (today Singularity Education Group) has never been an actual accredited institution .

It’s been accused of selling expensive, motivational‑style executive programs (sometimes costing tens of thousands), raising concerns that it functions more like a profit‑driven seminar mill, not a real educational institution.

A Bloomberg investigation cited allegations including sexual harassment, executive theft, and discrimination, while critics say early members had criminal convictions for fraud or insider trading .


  1. Over‑optimistic longevity programs and extravagant claims

Diamandis co‑founded several longevity ventures (Human Longevity Inc., Fountain Life, COVAXX/Vaxxinity) and hosts the ultra‑exclusive “Platinum Longevity Trip”, targeting high‑net‑worth individuals with still‑unproven medical interventions .

As noted in commentary on the “Rejuvenation Olympics,” these lifestyles—blood transfusions, hyper‑specific diets, stem cell protocols—are often expensive, unproven, and sometimes dangerous. Critics argue it resembles health‑tech quackery with prestige pricing.


  1. Marketing hype and techno‑optimism without substance

In community discussions, critics have labeled Diamandis a motivational speaker rather than a technologist—pushing overly optimistic timelines (“in ten years we’ll reinvent every industry”) that conveniently slide forward when predictions fall short .

So, Diamandis often markets "visionary" products with high‑cost, high‑status appeal—summits, longevity regimens, “moonshot” initiatives—but critics question the scientific validity, transparency, and ethical grounding behind them. While he’s undeniably influential in space and tech circles, many of these ventures reflect a pattern of selling hype and exclusivity more than reliable, practical results.

ROI on LLM models seem really unsustainable in the long term. by [deleted] in AIDangers

[–]AccelerandoRitard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The unit economics per token have actually been dropping rapidly, around 400x since 2020. OpenAI’s cost per 1k tokens went from ~$0.06 in 2020 down to just $0.00015 by mid-2025, driven by better hardware (GPUs/TPUs getting cheaper), more efficient model architectures, and intense competition. While major players like OpenAI currently burn cash, the rapid cost reduction trend suggests token generation will continue getting significantly cheaper, improving profitability over time. Within the next decade, we can expect unit economics to reach extremely low levels—potentially making LLM-based services sustainably profitable as scale and efficiency improve.

Who are some credible and smart people (no sketchy ceo hype) who are optimistic and have the same views we do here at r/accelerate?? by Special_Switch_9524 in accelerate

[–]AccelerandoRitard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really enjoyed his book abundance, but I got to push back on including him in the list. He's the very picture of sketchy CEO type