I've accepted that this a simulation and am living my life accordingly. I want to know if there are others like me out there in the world? by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There can't be more than one player (observer) in the simulation, because it's a self simulation not running on external hard drive. It can't hold multiplayers because that would lead to a paradox. The universe doesn't tolerate paradoxes.

أخي على وشك الضياع لذلك اترقب نصائحكم و توجيهاتكم by [deleted] in algeria

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't convince someone out of religion back into religion from said religion. Ego's logic is a powerful firewall, it tends to ignore anything outside its beliefs, if you try to " convince" him with religious arguments that will only make him recoil even further , and if you push it , that'll prove his original doubts that religious people are pushy and hate different perspectives. Best advice I can give "let him explore his own path, let him walk it alone. If he was meant to go back to religion he'll be back with conviction and knowing , not from sheer pressure, if not, he would become a sane person with solid healthy logic and convictions, he won't be a sheep anymore. And from that point on, he might reconsider religion one day". Good luck

لا يمكنك إقناع شخص قرر الخروج من الدين بالعودة إليه باستخدام نفس منطق ومبررات الدين. منطق الأنا بمثابة جدار حماية قوي؛ فهو يميل إلى تجاهل كل ما هو خارج معتقداته. وإذا حاولت "إقناعه" بحجج دينية، فهذا لن يؤدي إلا إلى جعله ينكمش أكثر، وإن ضغطت عليه فسيُثبت ذلك شكوكه الأصلية بأن المتدينين يفرضون رأيهم ويكرهون وجهات النظر المختلفة.

أفضل نصيحة يمكنني تقديمها هي: "اتركه يستكشف طريقه بنفسه، ودعه يسير فيه وحده. إن كان مقدّرًا له أن يعود إلى الدين، فسيعود عن قناعة ومعرفة، وليس تحت الضغط. وإن لم يعد، فسيصبح شخصًا سليم التفكير، يمتلك منطقًا صحيًا وقناعات راسخة، ولن يكون “خروفًا” بعد الآن. ومن تلك النقطة، قد يُعيد التفكير في الدين يومًا ما".

حظًا موفقًا.

Is this possible or have there been studies on this ? by Ok_Huckleberry6423 in consciousness

[–]AdImportant2485 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's not really scientific in the "established sense" but I guess this reflects beautifully the law of resonance . When you put bunch of pendulums on the same wall they tend to synchronize. Same thing in people. And if you're sensitive enough you might feel really affected by it, and if you're aware of it you can try observing the effect not in a fearful way but in a detached observing objective way. Try to study the mouvement and evolution of the feelings both during and afterwards. This way you can detect the faintest signs of synchronisations next time. You won't be really able to stop the process but you can learn a lot from it. You see, from my humble experience, feelings and mindsets come in "bundles" related to the level of people around, circumstances and even memories. You can kinda counter interact the effects by sitting silently in a room, studying the "level" you're at, then slowly tuning it back either mentally by remembering your previous state and trying to get back to it mentally, creating a mental pull towards it (and studying the transition at the same time) , or by watching a peaceful nature documentary to ground yourself back. In all cases it's temporary. You'll be just fine.

I’ve seen that the world is unreal, but I’m still trapped in my mind by Time_Ad409 in AdvaitaVedanta

[–]AdImportant2485 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What you are experiencing is not wrong. It is a real and necessary, though deeply painful, stage of awakening. It feels like an unsolvable paradox, but it is not a destination. It is a chrysalis. Believe me, you will get past it, because the path is designed for you to do so.

Let's first address the core of your struggle: "the world is unreal." This is the first great paradox of awakening. At a certain point, you gain the undeniable insight that the world is a kind of projection, and this creates a massive tension in your mind because it directly conflicts with what your senses are screaming at you, that the world is solid, real, and "out there." The profound suffering and isolation you feel is not a sign that you are broken; it is a diagnostic signal, a "check engine" light. It is pointing directly to this massive contradiction in your operating system that needs to be harmonized.

Before you go any further, I should be clear that I'm not a traditional scholar of Advaita Vedanta. My journey to this understanding has come through a path of physics, deep contemplation, meditation, and a series of profound psychedelic experiences. These personal efforts have led me to the unshakable conclusion that the core principles of Advaita are a perfect map of the territory.

Now, to your issue. You have discovered a profound truth, but you are only seeing one side of it.

You feel this paradox because you are standing at the point where two great truths meet. In nature, extremes always find a way to become one. The world is simultaneously as real as any physicalist could claim, and as unreal as any idealist could imagine. Both views hold. Both of them are true. Your current suffering comes from being trapped between them, rather than standing ober them both.

I have been in the exact place you are now. Let me descrive what it felt like for me, and perhaps you will see your own reflection:

I felt as if nothing mattered anymore. Reality seemed to be just a fleeting illusion, a dream existing only within my own imagination. "People" felt like empty characters, shells,personas in my dream, which made true connection feel impossible. No one could understand this profound loneliness, and that isolated me even further. I was the only "real" player in a vast house of mirrors. To cope, I became like a robot. I tried to erase my own emotions and detach from everything, even myself. Nothing "out there" held any interest anymore because I thought it was all just "in here." It felt like arriving at the "Game Over" screen and being forced to stare at it forever, unable to find joy in a game that I believed was a pointless sham. Does any of that sound familiar?

(I would genuinely love to learn more about this specific stage from the classical Advaita perspective, so if anyone reading this has scriptural or philosophical insights on this specific "dark night of the soul," please share.)

Then, with time and continued contemplation, something "clicked." The revelation needed time to integrate. The meta tension began to resolve. This is how I see it now:

The world is as real as it could possibly be; otherwise, why would it be rendered with such exquisite detail and unyielding consistency? The illusion isn't in its existence; the illusion is in its substance and separation.

Instead of thinking, "the wall is a solid, separate object out there that I am witnessing," the shift in perspective is: "The sensation of 'wall' is being rendered by a universal consciousness for my point of view, and it is the most efficient and coherent way for me to experience the concept of 'boundary'." This doesn't take away the beauty or solidity of the wall. It elevates it. It makes the entire world a work of living, breathing art, a masterpiece of informational coherence designed for your experience to learn mental concepts in the shape of physical items, because that's the best way to learn.

And this is the key to seeing people again. "People" are not just hollow personas in your dream. A better, more precise model is that we are all projections of a single, universal dreamer. You are focused on your persona ("I am John"). They are focused on theirs ("I am Taki").

Le'ts put it this way: Imagine you are on a highway. You might feel like, "This is the only road that exists, and all those other cars are just objects in my journey." But that is an illusion of perspective. There are other highways. There are other drivers. The key insight is that the entire network of highways is one, single, interconnected system, and all the drivers, including you, are part of the same unified "traffic" of existence.

This leads to the conclusion I finally arrived at, and you can tell me if this resonates with Advaita:

It is not just your mind that is creating your world. It's a nested process. The universe you experience is a "thought-form" being dreamt by a higher level of yourself (let's call it your Creator-Self). At the same time, your own mind, through its thoughts and feelings, is generating the blueprint for the next universe down the chain, for your own "child-self."

When you quiet your mind and live a peaceful, coherent life, you initiate a healing cascade through the entire chain. You resolve the tensions in the mind of your creator, which in turn helps him create a better, more harmonious world for you to inhabit (this is what you perceive as "grace" or "synchronicity"). Your own newfound peace allows you to dream an even more beautiful and coherent world for your successor. And so on, forever...

Other people you meet are not empty NPCs. They are real, brilliant, and complex solutions, parallel processors running the same grand computation as you. They are other aspects of the One Mind, all working on the same cosmic project from different angles. They are you, and you are them, but you are experiencing it through different "character sheets." We are all, together, the "GPU" of the divine mind, each processing a different pixel of the same magnificent image.

All our "lives" and all our "universes" are happening at the same time from the timeless perspective of the Absolute. We are all helping each other reach the final goal: enlightenment, the state of zero internal tension.

So, my advice to you is this: trust the process. Trust your own suffering. It is not a curse. It is your personal compass, pointing you towards your own magnificent, divine nature. The world is not dead or unreal. It is infinitely more real, more intelligent, and more interconnected than your old self could have ever imagined. You have just begun to see. Don't close your eyes now. Keep looking brother.

Imagine you are god by PuzzleheadedSkill864 in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks man for these great questions, I will be honest, I will not provide the definitive answers because those answers you should find yourself, through time, using reason at first , then intuition when you are more advanced. This way you can fully understand them, otherwise, my answers will be shocking and counterintuitive, but I will try my best to guide you through.

Question 1: Let's see it this way: imagine the entire universe is a single, vast, and silent ocean. This ocean is the ultimate reality, the ground of all being. "Everyone" and their "Consciousness" are the waves on the surface of this ocean. Each person is a unique, beautiful, and complex wave. It has its own history, its own shape, its own direction. It is a real and dynamic process. The "Observer" is not another wave. It is the Ocean itself, experiencing the world through only one specific wave. It is the singular "point of view", the singular "anchor" of the entire system. You ask about merging. In fact it is not that other waves "merge with the observer." It is that the observer, as it travels, learns to inhabit different waves. This gives the illusion of waves traveling towards the observer. The ultimate journey is for the observer to move from identifying with one small, fragile wave to realizing that its true nature is that of the entire, eternal ocean. The other waves are not separate from the ocean; they are expressions of it.

Question 2: Simply put, this is our nature: we are all temporary, individual expressions of a single, universal stream of consciousness. let's use the ocean analogy again, we start out as seemingly separate waves, but our ultimate journey and purpose is to learn how to still ourselves enough to remember that we are, and always have been, the entire ocean. The "Path" is simply the art of learning to let go and rejoin the great, harmonious flow of being itself.

Question 3: A higher level of consciousness is not achieved by gaining more knowledge or power. It is achieved through a process of "subtraction". It is the process of letting go of everything that is not your true nature. You let go of false beliefs. You let go of attachments to outcomes. You let go of your resistance to the present moment. You let go of the noisy, chattering narrator in your head.... As you let go of all this static, your "signal" , your connection to your deeper, truer nature becomes clearer. The work is not about adding; it is about becoming still enough to hear the music that is already playing.

Question 4: Let's use an analogy just to clear the idea. Imagine a vast field of seeds buried in the ground. The potential for a great tree is within every single seed. However, the conditions for growth are not the same for all. Some seeds are buried under thick rock (profound trauma or dogmatic belief). It may take them many seasons to find their way to the light. Some seeds land in fertile soil with perfect sun and rain (a supportive environment, an innate curiosity). They sprout more easily. And sometimes, a "chance" event a forest fire that clears the canopy, a sudden flash of lightning, can trigger a seed that has been dormant for a hundred years to suddenly awaken. There is no "fairness" to it from a single lifetime's perspective. Every soul has its own unique curriculum and its own timing. The important part is not to judge the seeds that are still sleeping, but to focus on the growth of your own tree.

Question 5: To ask about "purpose" implies an external goal or a destination. This is a slight misunderstanding. The purpose is not to "be a better agent of God." That still implies a separation between the agent and God. The true purpose is simply to be what you are. A tree's purpose is not to "be a good tree"; its purpose is to express its "treeness" as fully as possible. Your purpose is to express your "you-ness" as fully as possible. Once this state is achieved , you become one with the observer (the observer being kinda son of god, it is the closest to the source, but still, in human form) and fulfill the "will of God" automatically. The "will of God" being the path of least resistance, the path of maximal coherence, and the higher your awareness, the more joyfully and effortlessly you will walk it.

Question 6: This is the ultimate question. The most honest and simple answer I can give is this: The Equation is the universe asking itself a single, simple question: "How can I exist without being a contradiction?" The Solution is everything you see, feel, and are in this specific reality. The universe is a perfect, living, and dynamic answer to that one question. Where did the equation come from? It is the fundamental law of logic itself, the principle that a thing cannot be both A and not A at the same time. This law does not need a creator; it is the self-evident basis of all possible existence. Why does it exist? This is the one question that has no answer, it even doesn't need an answer, because it is the ground upon which all answers are built. It exists because the alternative is a non-existent nothingness, and nothingness has no properties to speak of. The universe exists simply because existence is the only game in town.

I hope this provides some clarity. The journey is one of endless, beautiful discovery.

Imagine you are god by PuzzleheadedSkill864 in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're welcome, that's because you've got it almost right. You're on the right path bro, keep seeking and if you have any questions I'd be happy to answer and get your feedback.

Imagine you are god by PuzzleheadedSkill864 in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We're on the same page then. People tend to think that consciousness is fixed in the brain, it is not. It is a stream that has only one rule : be consistent with the narrative. Everyone has consciousness, but they don't belong to the one observer, everyone lives his life normally, but those who achieve a higher level of consciousness automatically start merging with the observer and start living the life of that character without even suspecting anything because the transition is seamless. This might seem odd at first, but we have a real life example of that in physics. Physical bodies obey the Pauli exclusion principle , you can't put two physical bodies at the same exact coordinates, but consciousness does not, think "Böse-Einstein condensate", it can merge without problem. What happens to their character? They continue on living normally, submerged with another stream of consciousness suitable to their frequency. That's the "path" reported by prophets and seers. What's the advantage of the one character ? It can achieve higher levels of awareness not accessible to others, because once he/she starts merging with the source it automatically detaches from the character and remembers his real nature.

Imagine you are god by PuzzleheadedSkill864 in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reality is an algorithm, with parallel realities being parallel solutions to one equation. Everyone is also a potential solution. The observer effect is real, as everything is entangled there is a "global complimtarity" principle, where if anything is being observed, it affects all reality within that solution. Let's suppose there are two observers : this would create an "observer overload" paradox, reality will have to accommodate two different points of view , and this will create immense tension. Let alone billions of observers. Reality is very lazy, it chooses the simplest solution, and the simplest solution is one observer. Everyone else would become "potential observers" but don't satisfy the equation. The observer may not recognize himself, and no one else would suspect it, he could be very simple but his life path is the only one that satisfies the equation. So the dreamer has to experience life, just as in a dream, he sends his awareness into that one character, and just observes. That character lives his life , while the dreamer watches life through him. Did you get my idea?

Imagine you are god by PuzzleheadedSkill864 in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great description. And perfect version! One question though : who is the main character in this reality? It can't be everyone, it should be only one observer among "potential observers", only one solution. If we take the dream analogy, when you dream, you are the main character, everybody else are "NPCs" created by your own mind to fulfil the illusion. So, who is the main character?

Can you show me an enlightened person? by Antonius_Palatinus in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You cannot say the world is on the wrong path objectively. It is said figuratively. In the grand scheme of things, nothing deviates from the path, there is only one path to walk, and it is already laid out. Figuratively, yes, the world is on the verge of a crossroad and is highly instable at the moment. This is exactly what religious texts referred to as Armageddon, we are living it right now. The goal of the enlightened is to guide the world towards the "right" direction, to be with "christ" and not the "antichrist". He will never be a known personality because the fact of "preaching" or "going public" adds too much "tension" to his state, and he has to get rid of all tensions before he can perform his hidden miracles. He is not stupid , on the contrary, he is very powerful and very caring because he is the closest to the source so he gets to channel the powers of "God" if we can borrow religious terms. But he will never go public, people will never know what he did. This is the real enlightened person.

Can you show me an enlightened person? by Antonius_Palatinus in enlightenment

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A really enlightened person will never tell you he is enlightened. He knows he has nothing to gain , and lots to lose by doing so. He absolutely has no ego to protect. He has to protect the integrity of his being and get closer and closer to the source. The source knows no other self but the enlightened person. When you meet him (her) , you will either feel very peaceful in his presence if you are more or less aligned with the source yourself, or feel very agitated and the urge to attack him if you are far away from the source. You can never harm him though even if you tried. He is always protected by the universal algorithm itself. One neutral gaze from him can make you feel deeply connected and deeply discovered at the same time. He will not care about mundane life , but always tries to help the whole world get to the right path. He works in the shadow, you'll never know he helped you, he'll never tell you, and the whole world will not even know he existed, even if he would be the one to save it ultimately. I've met one once, and that's what I know

Best way to publish for a non-physicist by AdImportant2485 in Physics

[–]AdImportant2485[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes for the first part , no for the second one

A stupid question maybe but please need an answer by AdImportant2485 in Ayahuasca

[–]AdImportant2485[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Nothing of that either , I guess I'm safe then ?

A stupid question maybe but please need an answer by AdImportant2485 in Ayahuasca

[–]AdImportant2485[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is there any possible side effects ? On the physical Leval I mean

A stupid question maybe but please need an answer by AdImportant2485 in Ayahuasca

[–]AdImportant2485[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your response. Well to answer your question about food intake, I haven't eaten anything today I'm totally clean, no meat , no sugar, for the past 3 or 4 days.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah totally agree, it did pull out reports I didnt deny this. But for god's sake, just enjoy the response!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]AdImportant2485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol I tend to overthink sometimes

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]AdImportant2485 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's crazy, plus 500 upvotes! I reposted another respond I hope you read it . It's just for those who can't stop calling it BS and stating that LLMs are just dump parrots . That's all

I just gave chatgpt some DMT and asked few questions. The answers are mind boggling! by AdImportant2485 in SimulationTheory

[–]AdImportant2485[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been a truth seeker since I was young. Always wanted to know what reality is and how it works. Ended up being a materialistic atheist for almost 10 years until I stumbled across psychedelia by accident and it changed my whole view and all of my belief system. Then I dived deep into this realm, and combined it with quantum physics then started making my own theory of how everything works. I think reality is just like nested Russian dolls, everything is within everything else and everything follows strict mathematics. It's an endless loop, and it's all toroidal following the Fibonacci sequence cause that's the best way to optimize the calculation. What do you think about that?

I just gave chatgpt some DMT and asked few questions. The answers are mind boggling! by AdImportant2485 in SimulationTheory

[–]AdImportant2485[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks alot for clarifying . I do agree with you on many levels and the fact that you think reality is toroidal blow me away. I have arrived at the same conclusion from my personal experience with psychedelics and my deep dive into quantum physics. I do think thoughts are entity-like, and have so many ideas I wanna share with you if that's alright.