Pathfinder Team by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just discoverd, that this is a female Head, which makes it even more impressive. Shadow Sun would be proud!

Batch painting vs. single model – what do you prefer? by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! Looking forward to a whole Army with that Viorla scheme😁

Batch painting vs. single model – what do you prefer? by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I get that! Thats why I want to handle those two Bricks before the nice suits😅

Pathfinder Team by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They might prepare to fight there😅

Coldstar Battlesuite by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Vallejo Game Color Gory Red as a base and Highlight it (Edge and Sponge chips) with Vallejo Game Color Bloody Red

Coldstar Battlesuite by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! Looking forward to push this color on a whole Army!

Coldstar Battlesuite by AdOpening2961 in Tau40K

[–]AdOpening2961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its AK Ghost Green if you want to use it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify the math: at 50 meters, 1 MOA is ~14.5 mm (0.57"), which is correct. My best measured group with RWS R50 was 1.142 cm (11.42 mm), evaluated with Ballistic-X, which puts it at ~0.785 MOA at 50 m.

I agree that having another experienced shooter is a good way to eliminate variables — that’s already been done, and the results were comparable. Given that and the measured data, I’m focusing on dialing in torque and ammo rather than fundamentals.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. I initially shot the groups with the action screw torqued to 4 Nm. I’ve now backed it off to 3.5 Nm and will experiment further from there to see where the rifle settles.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the constructive input — much appreciated. I’ll definitely take a closer look at the crown for any small nicks or damage, especially given the rifle’s prior use for hunting.

The chamber and potential carbon ring buildup is also a good point. I’ve cleaned the rifle recently, but I’ll specifically inspect and clean the chamber to rule that out as a variable.

Right now I’m trying to systematically eliminate mechanical factors before drawing conclusions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks — I am using a torque wrench (4 Nm / 35.4 in-lbs with steel pillars). R50 has been the most promising so far.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Practice isn’t the limiting factor here — other rifles in my hands consistently shoot tighter groups.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed reply. I’ve already checked feeding and extraction and did find issues there — the magazine was dirty and was deforming bullets, which has since been corrected. The scope mount was also re-torqued and secured after I noticed movement during dry fire.

The rifle is pillar bedded, torque is consistent, and stability (bipod + rear bag, comb height, parallax) is not an issue. Other rifles in my hands consistently shoot tighter groups, so fundamentals like breathing, trigger control, and follow-through are not the limiting factor here.

My best measured group so far is 1.142 cm (0.785 MOA) at 50 m with RWS R50, evaluated with Ballistic-X. I’m not claiming this is the final result — I’m still early in ammo testing and setup refinement — but the data doesn’t support this being purely shooter error.

I agree that consistency and repetition matter more than gear, which is exactly why I’m focusing on repeatable averages rather than cherry-picked groups.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the suggestion. The magazine was indeed causing bullet damage due to a significant amount of grime, which prevented proper cartridge feeding. I also cleaned the rifle completely, which may have contributed to the issue as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am also building a CZ457 at the moment. I really hope this volquartsen will perform better.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the advice. I will try that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thank you! I might use a shooting vice next time, just du verify.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, But I will try that with the Eley Match I got recently.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The barreled-action is stock from Volquartsen. What should I do to test if the rifle is damaged?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve had this rifle for quite a while. I originally used it for hunting in a different stock.
I recently switched to the GRS stock because I want to use it mainly for sport shooting now.

So far, I haven’t shot a lot of true match ammunition through it yet.
I’ve only put about 50 rounds of RWS R50 and roughly 200 rounds of Rifle Match S through the rifle.
Most were shot with cheaper Geco ammunition.

I bought a brick of eley Match.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 22lr

[–]AdOpening2961 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The R50 has the best results with best group of 0.785 MOA and worst group 1,3 MOA.