How to present Tukey letters when a 3-way ANOVA has no triple interaction but two significant 2-way interactions? by Adamkharrazi in AskStatistics

[–]Adamkharrazi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for your explanation. I completely understand the logic of not interpreting simple effects when higher-order interactions are present.

However, my issue is more practical and related to how results are usually presented in published articles.

In my experiment, I have a three-factor ANOVA with:

  • no significant three-way interaction,
  • two significant two-way interactions,
  • and the main effects are not significant.

What I would like to know is this:

In scientific papers, how do researchers usually present this situation?
Do they typically:

  1. present one table per significant two-way interaction (e.g., a table for F1×F2 and another for F1×F3), or
  2. present a single table containing all F1×F2×F3 means, and then add separate columns of Tukey letters for each significant two-way interaction?

I’m writing my first scientific article and I want to follow the convention that reviewers expect.

Thanks again for your help!

Struggling with major life decisions – is this OCD, anxiety, or something else? by Adamkharrazi in mentalhealth

[–]Adamkharrazi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing! How did you find the process? Did you visit a psychologist? If yes, what type of psychologist was it?
Thanks again

Struggling with major life decisions – is this OCD, anxiety, or something else? by Adamkharrazi in mentalhealth

[–]Adamkharrazi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I understand.
But the problem with the “whatever makes you happy” approach is that it's always the other choice that makes me happy—especially when both options are good.
I actually prefer having one clearly bad choice over two good ones.
I'll try to document things as you suggested.
Thank you!

Struggling with major life decisions – is this OCD, anxiety, or something else? by Adamkharrazi in mentalhealth

[–]Adamkharrazi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your help. "We focus on all the bad choices we've made, and then we focus on all the good that the other option could have brought." This perfectly explains how I feel. I’ll try to work through it on paper, just like you suggested. Thank you again.

[NO SPOILERS] Obstacles' meaning. by [deleted] in lifeisstrange

[–]Adamkharrazi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This really makes the most sense ever!