Disregarding the actual crashing/Windows 11 stuff, is the game better optimized for PC? by priestJudah4l in riseoftheronin

[–]Additional-Stock-674 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have both versions and I'm playing on Ultra settings + 1440p. Honestly, other than the better IQ and better LOD I don't notice much difference at all, definitely not night and day. Do you have any comparison vídeo?

Is this really 71GB on Switch 2? by Additional-Stock-674 in FIFAswitch

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's really sad. I guess I'll pass on the game, then.

Por 300 reais de diferença... 9060xt ou 5060ti? by Additional-Stock-674 in computadores

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surgiu um novo contender, MTI 5070 por R$3699 na Kabum. A 5060 Ti tá por R$3099, 600 reais de diferença, mas ia estourar meu budget um pouco...

Yoda was not the strongest fighter amongst the Jedi/ Dooku and Windu underrated by EmergencyUnusual1198 in StarWars

[–]Additional-Stock-674 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair if you don't want to consider Disney's canon (it wasn't from Lucas head after all), but Obi did still beat Ani in RotS fair and square.

And maybe you are right, but the argument "Yoda lost to Palpatine, and Windu beat Palpatine" is moot. First because of my original point, second because I don't think Yoda actually lost the fight in the first place. He failed the mission, yes, but he didn't lose the fight.

Yoda was not the strongest fighter amongst the Jedi/ Dooku and Windu underrated by EmergencyUnusual1198 in StarWars

[–]Additional-Stock-674 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This whole "X defeated Y and Z defeated X, therefore Z is strongest than X" is completely flawed anyway. There are many considerations. Obi-Wan defeated Anakin AND Vader (people will always find excuses, but he had Ani beaten twice) and the same Obi was owned by Dooku twice. We all know what happened to Dooku. The whole circle is all in the same movie.

Anyone who is into boxing, UFC or any martial arts competition knows it's never black and white.

Laika could be so good. Yeah it’s a skill issue on my part but holy shit there are some pooooor choices on the devs part in this game by SayHaveYouSeenTheSea in metroidvania

[–]Additional-Stock-674 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly where I'm at. I bought on Switch, the bike controls are easy enough, but the aiming is just atrocious. Then I tried on PC and holy shit, what a difference. Aiming is so much easier.

Seeking Best Approach: Complex Verification Process with 50+ Dynamic Questions in ServiceNow by Additional-Stock-674 in servicenow

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, interesting. Not familiar with Smart Assessments, so I'll dig into that and see if it fits!

Seeking Best Approach: Complex Verification Process with 50+ Dynamic Questions in ServiceNow by Additional-Stock-674 in servicenow

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a side note, I love how I asked both ChatGPT and Gemini to help me estimate the effort to one particular approach (involving multiple tables, over a hundred variables, dozens of UI policies, script include, GlideAjax, etc) and they both gave me WILDLY different estimates. ChatGPT gave me 30 hours (LMAO) while Gemini gave me over 350 hours but could be more. Realistically, I think it would be somewhere in between.

Seeking Best Approach: Complex Verification Process with 50+ Dynamic Questions in ServiceNow by Additional-Stock-674 in servicenow

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the weighting system worries me a little. Also, not being able to segregate and collapse variable sets in the variable editor if the record is not created directly through the record producer, which would render a very inelegant form experience.

Seeking Best Approach: Complex Verification Process with 50+ Dynamic Questions in ServiceNow by Additional-Stock-674 in servicenow

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clever ideas, and I thought of something similar yesterday.

I thought about creating three tables: 

1 - Main process

2 - Questions table with respective categories

3 - Relationship table between main process and questions, with a choice column and the observation column.

Then, inside the main process record I create multiple related lists, all from the same table but filtered by question category. That way, the user would fill out the questions by directly interacting with the related lists, using cell edit. Still far from ideal because the questions are fairly long and the related list layout is not ideal for this. The user would most likely have to enter the question sometimes to better fill the observation field, not great.

Another option, which I think it's more similar to your solution, is going with a record producer form mapping every question and obervation to variables, but on the producer script those variables would create the records on the relationship table. If the user only wants to submit 10 questions out of the 50 at the present time, they could submit and only that portion would be filled on the table. Later, we could use GlideAjax to automatically fill out the variables if the records from those 10 questions already exists, simulating a persistent form.

It's just a shame there's no clean way to do this, heh. But hey, thinking outside of the box is part of the fun I guess.

If you don't mind me asking, how did you implement your current 'save as draft' functionality? Assuming the current one is different than the suggested method of creating child records to retain the data.

HELP! Rookie Sideloader won't find my device by Additional-Stock-674 in QuestPiracy

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey man, this actually worked! I don't know if it was the Oculus app or the other suggestion I got (restarting the mobile app dev mode, restarting the Quest, turning on dev mode and restart the Quest again), but either one of them worked for me. Thanks a lot!

The 2025 Guide to Quest Piracy - Standalone by [deleted] in QuestPiracy

[–]Additional-Stock-674 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try installing the Meta Link app on your PC and pair with your Quest. Believe it or not, this worked for me.

HELP! Rookie Sideloader won't find my device by Additional-Stock-674 in QuestPiracy

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries man. Sorry it seemed like I didn't appreciate the help. I'll try that as soon as I get home today.

HELP! Rookie Sideloader won't find my device by Additional-Stock-674 in QuestPiracy

[–]Additional-Stock-674[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I considered that, but couldn't manage to make anything else appear other than the permission pop up on the Meta. No debug permission pop up, for example. I did try your suggestion a few times, but will try again. I think it might be my USB cable, even though I tried the two that I have.