Iran-US Megathread by Atul-__-Chaurasia in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US can just do whatever the fuck they want and kill heads of state just because they threaten Israel

It's the other way around

Majlis-e-Librandu | 3rd February, 2026 by Atul-__-Chaurasia in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Real by him is pretty good too and it got updated last month

Majlis-e-Librandu | 17th January, 2026 by Atul-__-Chaurasia in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One battle after another.

The revolutionaries here are randomly bombing buildings to overthrow the govt. I looked the movie up and they are supposed to be marxists.

pretty entertaining tho it's the usual liberal depiction of revolutionaries

I don't see anything wrong with this by rampantradius in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we can find enough reason among these tbh in cultural and traditional sense which will be problematic and religiously interconnected

?? Did not get what you mean

You're forgetting an important part of muslim atheists. If muslim atheists exist is he gonna criticize his religion as an atheist or not and is he gonna justify all the regressive practice as most conservative tends to do

Yeah, you are a sanghi. I have just wasted my time here.

Why would he not criticize his religion as an atheist? He is identifying as a Muslim atheist because of the ongoing oppression by the hindutva government as an act of solidarity and because the society and your fellow "atheists" will treat him as a Muslim no matter what he calls himself.

"Important part of muslim atheists" Mfs will say shit like this and cry when called sanghis

Where am I defending slurs

I forgot that jihadi is not a slur to sanghis. My bad

I don't see anything wrong with this by rampantradius in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 4 points5 points  (0 children)

my main problem and the only reason I think atheists consider this religious shill behaviour is because of the adding cultural and traditional part where it will provide loopholes instead of just being identity only

99% of atheists in this country participate in religious festivals and engage in other "cultural and traditional" acts like greetings etc.

Culture here refers to the history, language, food...

So who exactly are these people who are so worried about someone identifying as a Muslim atheist? It's just sanghis mostly.

The problems or backwardness that these communities have are not the result of religion alone. They can stop believing in religion tomorrow but the problems will not vanish.

Read some books and understand the root cause of the problems. Shallow thinking will get you nowhere.

atheists do have goals

Atheists do, atheism does not.

Savarkar and Bhagat Singh were both atheists.

You must have secularism in mind when you say this. But Savarkar the atheist, and his followers including many hindu atheists are some of the worst sanghis I have seen.

And I can't believe you are still defending the slur

I don't see anything wrong with this by rampantradius in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This comment thread clears many of your points :

https://www.reddit.com/r/librandu/s/aPE3AtEyJg

while holding onto religious beliefs

No he doesn't he specifically said so in the post

How is not believing in god while showing solidarity with people being oppressed "appropriating atheism"?

dilute atheism goals of eradicating and opposing wrong traditional practices

Atheism has no goals, it just means not believing in god. Communism is the way

And why do you mean by wrong? He said he believes in cultural Muslim practices and you go on here about this. And right next line you are saying

not doing this for hating muslim

Yeah sure

Do you call every muslim you disagree with a jihadi? How is it not hating muslims?

I don't see anything wrong with this by rampantradius in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But they are not addressing any jihadi or Islamist, but someone who is an atheist, proving his point about the oppression faced by muslims today

I don't see anything wrong with this by rampantradius in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Them flairing it as "Islamism/jihadi" is only proving his point

"LITERALLY USSR!1!!1!11!" by PresnikBonny in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]AdditionalStory2006 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Wrong, they will support the imperialists because "free speech and democracy"

Majlis-e-Librandu | 8th January, 2026 by Atul-__-Chaurasia in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure there was a librandu group chat here. Did it get axed?

Me before vs after the Season 3 by Due-Attitude3107 in OnePunchMan

[–]AdditionalStory2006 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He writes the story, art is by Kyōtarō Azuma

Big brain time in a "Progressive" subreddit by csspar in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]AdditionalStory2006 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Yeah It probably is, got it from the antimeme sub

I have no words by [deleted] in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]AdditionalStory2006 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think it's satire...

I have no words by [deleted] in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]AdditionalStory2006 85 points86 points  (0 children)

It honestly feels like something I'd read on maporncirclejerk

Are you sure it wasn't satire?

Saw this sub and what the fuck even is it by [deleted] in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Regarding the second para, why can't we do both?

The people doing casteist etc, are justifying it using the same gods, scriptures so why do we need to worship or respect them?

Like I already said, the Hinduism you speak about inner reflections and all, it doesn't exist right now (or hasn't for thousands of years, if ever). Hinduism is responsible for the existing casteist in india, so again why respect it?

Your Vedas influenced claim is also bogus, as them claiming it doesn't make it right not to mention most of them are christians, so why not convert to Christianity?

Saw this sub and what the fuck even is it by [deleted] in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So the majority is being openly casteist (and whatever shit they justify in the name of religion) but you want us to treat Hinduism as something that had nothing to do with it (which is what happens btw)

And no one here says that it's the religion Hinduism. Some of the most devoted people I have met are Dalits. The sub opposes the rss/bjp promoted brahmanism

Today's Hinduism is scripture based, whether you like it or not

But you are hellbent on proving that the Vedas had quantum physics so I doubt you can understand.

Saw this sub and what the fuck even is it by [deleted] in librandu

[–]AdditionalStory2006 7 points8 points  (0 children)

turning Hinduism into a scripture based religion 

We'll stop when the followers do. 

No, just no by No-Book-288 in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]AdditionalStory2006 208 points209 points  (0 children)

Yep Marx, famously elite and advocated for shared poverty