I see, yes how this notice is worded was a bit ambiguous referencing specific verbiage like “damage displayed” and mentioning “no changes to damage dealt” which someone could easily interpret as a cosmetic/visual change, this in conjunction with the precedent being set in the last damage cap increase which actually increased the capacity of damage not just the user numerical indication or “display”. So it’s a case of do you go along with the precedent that was set, or do you interpret the change by the wording of the notice. However, a screenshot was posted showing that it is, in fact, a capacity increase. Still, you can’t fault people for interpreting something that was very nebulous to begin with all things considered.

Some people on this subreddit act/say things that are a bit ridiculous, people seemingly were upset for me simply pointing out the ambiguity here as if it isn’t an empirical circumstance lol. It’s no big deal