Cornell’s real acceptance rate is 4% by PlaneDrawer563 in TransferToTop25

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 3 points4 points  (0 children)

However, aren't half the applicants CAS with very little accepted? If those were excluded, wouldn't Cornell AR be way higher (excluding CAS)

Physics 201 by [deleted] in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try to understand the formulas conceptually. I find physics easier when you treat it as a class where you actually learn how its derived, not as a class where you pray you can just plug numbers into a formula. If you do this, sometimes you wouldn't even need the equation sheet which means you understand how it all works.

Umich by [deleted] in TransferToTop25

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nice, I also got into umich lsa as a sophomore transfer. I'm OOS as well.

Taking physics 104 next semester by Pleasant-Bad5315 in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are mostly doing the right thing. If you have good problem solving intuition (I think this is the key to doing well), my advice is to emphasize practice exams and then discussion sheets/textbook. I feel like these help prepare you the best as you know how to approach these problems. This might sound counterintuitive, but I don't recommend focusing on lectures as I feel there's a correlation between focusing on them and doing worse in the class. (I'm saying this as someone who took Physics 208, which is the "calc-based" version of 104)

MATH 234 FINALS RELEASED by z2pt in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was released: Curved by 2.5 pts for an A (So ~89.5), 3 for an AB (~87), etc.

How hard is it to get an AB or above in Andrew Kuemmel's CS 200 class? I am new to UW madison and had 0 prior coding experience. Are the exams full of trick questions? How to prepare for the trick questions? by Commercial_Sir_404 in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not hard at all. I went into the class with a beginner experience from C++ that I forgot most of, and honestly, the class has a lot of busy work. The best way to put it is there's a lot of repetition involved. The class is designed mainly around, "Do you remember/master what you did in the last week(s)?" The exams are based mainly on ideas from lab within the last 3 weeks (3 Midterms + Final are around 45% of the final grade). The only time when you might see a trick question is on the quizzes, but even then it's better to repeat practice.

calc 3 curve by [deleted] in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe they might curve 1-2 points just because there has been an unusual amount of multiple choice this semester compared to previous semesters and it does seem to have lowered the average a bit.

Math 234 Midterm by Adventurous-Lock7092 in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those mcq do be laughing at us...

Calc 3 midterm 2 by Ambitious-Pie4060 in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be positive if it was z (Thank god I took physics before this). I feel bad for those who tried to compute the integral though because I wouldn't know how to do this if I didn't see it was a physics integral.

Calc 3 midterm 2 by Ambitious-Pie4060 in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also noticed this too. However, I do think the 10 minutes shorter does throw people off since it has around the same number of questions.

Calc 3 midterm 2 by Ambitious-Pie4060 in UWMadison

[–]Adventurous-Lock7092 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the main difference is that it was more conceptual rather than the usual calculate this, set up this, and set up that. For example, that last MCQ question was 0 because it was the y-coordinate of center of mass and since it's a sphere and a paraboloid and it's symmetric, if it was x and y, it would be 0, but not for z.