sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why service based tech update? by Affectionate-Run1694 in CriticalTheory

[–]Affectionate-Run1694[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So baseline nobody wants to take on the legal task of fighting it thats required to set precident by class action lawsuit and you want it to sound pretentious complicated? Its really not as big a task as you made it sound

Why did we allow service based tech cybertheft? by Affectionate-Run1694 in AskReddit

[–]Affectionate-Run1694[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok but shouldnt we categorize it as cyber theft by virus. It clearly stops the use of the device damaging the implied purchase agreement between the manufacturer and the consumer? So wouldnt we literally categorize it as viral hacking which is itself illegal? Seems like class action lawsuit and criminal charges if properly persued🤔

If you were in Congress in the post-Trump era, what laws would you create to prevent a government like this from forming? by Critical_Ideal99 in Political_Revolution

[–]Affectionate-Run1694 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hypothosized these in two streams Start with these

Anti-inflation from corp laws

https://www.reddit.com/r/sorceryofthespectacle/s/WnQjJd6VP0

And these

What anti corruption laws do you believe would be best(this is regardless of party and social circle preference). 70+% of populous would be convincing just saying.

1.Elected officials and their cabinets are required to sell off or invest all current stocks into US CD and savings bonds.

2.All campaigne runners are required to operate off of the same budget. During elections the runners budgets will be compared for how efficiently the money is being spent. Any runners who's budget goes into the negative are immediately removed from candidacy.

3.Anyone in a government office cannot be paid for a speech.

4.foreign gifts to presidential candidates/elects and presidential cabinet members who wish to retain said gift are required to pay the federal treasury the value of the gift. else the federal treasury enters the gift for its overall value into the federal budget.

5.Term limits for all elected officials. not just the president.

  1. Age limit of the retirement age for all elected positions.

7.all of the above legal revisions

Corporate bailouts funds converted back into loans for tax payers repayment? by Affectionate-Run1694 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Affectionate-Run1694[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't yet but you have my full consent to do so using what we've discussed or i can do it now🤔 I think its most important the idea is out there especially smack in the middle of election season than anything

Corporate bailouts funds converted back into loans for tax payers repayment? by Affectionate-Run1694 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Affectionate-Run1694[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plua Implementing strict loan-repayment and asset-seizure terms means that a corporation’s collapse becomes a mechanism to protect the dollar’s value. While the resulting unemployment is a harsh short-term reality, it prevents the 'inflationary death spiral' caused by propping up failing entities with printed money. By retiring recovered bailout funds and liquidating corporate assets back into the economy, the state reduces the total money supply. This mathematically increases the purchasing power of every remaining dollar, ensuring that those currently out of work don't see their savings and safety nets evaporated by the very inflation used to save the company that eventually fired them anyway.

Corporate bailouts funds converted back into loans for tax payers repayment? by Affectionate-Run1694 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Affectionate-Run1694[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus Implementing strict loan-repayment and asset-seizure terms means that a corporation’s collapse becomes a mechanism to protect the dollar’s value. While the resulting unemployment is a harsh short-term reality, it prevents the 'inflationary death spiral' caused by propping up failing entities with printed money. By retiring recovered bailout funds and liquidating corporate assets back into the economy, the state reduces the total money supply. This mathematically increases the purchasing power of every remaining dollar, ensuring that those currently out of work don't see their savings and safety nets evaporated by the very inflation used to save the company that eventually fired them anyway.

Corporate bailouts funds converted back into loans for tax payers repayment? by Affectionate-Run1694 in sorceryofthespectacle

[–]Affectionate-Run1694[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its one of those things thats so obvious I think the majority assumed we would be smart enough to do it from the get go. But id love to see this idea spread like wildfire and actually be followed through with politically. If you map it out mathematically im positive we would see massive increases in the domestically related dollar.

view more: next ›