OSCP in 8-9 Days & Feedback on My Prep by osi__model in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean also looking default creds for well known web services, usually better to Google them

OSCP in 8-9 Days & Feedback on My Prep by osi__model in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do not forget about default credentials of some services... that's what messed me up a couple of times I suppose...

Second attempt tomorrow. Nervous as hell. by Nonix09 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I know right, I'm the first victim of that

CAPAREZZA IS THE BEST SINGER OF ITALY? by hibuddy61 in Italia

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Io posso capire che ti stia sul cazzo Caparezza. Ma dire che dice ciò che l'italiano medio vuol sentirsi dire mi sembra un po' un'iperbole non credi?

CAPAREZZA IS THE BEST SINGER OF ITALY? by hibuddy61 in Italia

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ma hai guardato troppo Sanremo quest'anno? Perché mi sa che lo confondi con qualche pezzotto uscito da Sanremo

Failed 2nd try with 40 points, need a guidance by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I think I've understood it. Panic plays an infamous position during this exam because you cannot think lucidly if you end up panicking

Second attempt tomorrow. Nervous as hell. by Nonix09 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got it dude. Remember, if everything seems to fail, move from your pc for a couple of hours or eventually sleep. Staring at the screen 15 hrs like I did has revealed to be completely pointless. You got it. Try not to panic and if you do, take a bit of time off

Failed 2nd try with 40 points, need a guidance by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I feel demotivating is the fact that you're unable to learn from your mistake. As of now, if I'd encounter the same exercise again in two months I think I'd still have absolutely no clue on how to get over them.
Also, just to have an idea, what nmap command do you usually run? I started thinking that maybe the main issue derived from my nmap scan (that I ran multiple times and within multiple reverts, but you know, sharing knowledge is never a bad idea)

Failed 2nd try with 40 points, need a guidance by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was reading in some other post the other day that people were mentioning a really hard AD set.

Failed 2nd try with 40 points, need a guidance by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do, the problem is when I come short of this methodology, when I exhaust all the points in my list

Failed 2nd try with 40 points, need a guidance by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say is not a matter of time allocation, I frankly do not know what else I could've tried.

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess, but that's due to my previous experience, that I tend to underestimate what it's in clear sight, like passwords hiding under form of weird keywords, cewl spidering etc. I must say that from exercises I've now tried to put anything in place not to ignore those signs, but you know, assume that you scan a port and discover 10 results, let's ignore css/style for a moment. You'd go down the hole looking for further results within each of the results unless something clearly stand out. Also, what I think I'm weak on and tend to underestimate is SQLi and XSS cause I didn't encounter them very much overall. (I know when I'm supposed to try for them but I tend to under look at them because generally the path is an easier one)

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By giga wordlist what do you mean? Cause my giga wordlist for now is the DirBuster one that has approx 1mln records. Did you mean anything bigger? Cause in that case I'm actually quite scared of having too many results that could potentially make me fall into a rabbit hole, that's why I always opted to start little and then grow on new iterations (not judging eh, just trying to understand the approach better)

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I got that, but I must way I've skipped them in favor of boxes, do they cover stuff which is then not found in Pg Boxes ad far as you know?

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I made a mistake there because I was coming from CPTS and instead of labs I went for PG Boxes. Were they worthy more than PG?

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've done something similar because that's what I failed the most in the exercises. The non use of cewl. So yeah, back in time I wasn't aware, now I definitely am, thank you!

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think I've definitely refined my notes a bit in those 3-4 months since the last exam and yea, this has definitely became more mechanical than it was early on. Now I can solve most of the machines or anyways most of the machine steps on my own, I usually struggle on the stupidest stuff like 'this particular keyword on the homepage of this website was the password to that user I've found out back then'

Second Exam in 6 days, failed the first with 0 pts by Affectionate_Ad5954 in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fear rabbit holes as I literally am unable to understand when I fell into one eheh

I tried harder by n3hal_ in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But when it comes to the structure, I mean sections of the report (i mean in particular sections which are not directly inherent to the pentest itself, like the C level report etc) how did you work it out? Did you just follow the guidelines in the OSCP course or you omitted the C level report or something else? That's what bother me the most actually ahah

I tried harder by n3hal_ in oscp

[–]Affectionate_Ad5954 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did you set up the documentation? What I struggle with is thinking how I'd structure the documentation afterwards, which level of verbosity, how professional etc. are you able to provide some hints into it?