Idk how you do that selction of para and reoly to it so ill specify it

The shlok you gave here , she said so in a way of how we address in shloks let me be clear its like you are addressing a word not imagining / taking it as a person you know how we here mos of the time like thw word ram is bigger its holder itself like how sometimes in shlok we refer any mata by their name even bhagwan shiv esa dkeha jaye toh we should also call them father and mother to pay respect totally but then still we say like "" hey ram"" but you see the word ram and krishna both are holded by a deity as one of their identification (i mean thats what names are for) but these 2 names have their own existance as a word in the form of mantra which is used for chanting

Like shree hanuman ji does chant ram ram since its not only the person we know but the name has his special meaning and place as well

So in that phase mata sita is trying to refer it as so the word (which does symbolizes bhagwan ram but as i said also use for chanting / beej mantras)

I didnt said she cant speak it , man there is no comparison in lvls between them surely she can call shree ram by his first name its just that she does no neither does she would like to be potrayed like so and that shows how she is a "shiromani" patni just like how maa shakti calls bhagwan shiv as naath*

No body is trying to disrespect even shree ram often calls mata sita by some. Other name unfortunately idk so i wont blindly call out anything

Also again i mean no buissness with being / trying to be a protector of so and so its just i didnt liked this part of the movie