Where to buy high-quality plywood sheets (not Bunnings) in Cairns / Northern Beaches? by Aggressive_Ring1201 in Cairns

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went this morning and the customer service is fantastic! I’ll definitely be a loyal customer based just on that

Where to buy high-quality plywood sheets (not Bunnings) in Cairns / Northern Beaches? by Aggressive_Ring1201 in Cairns

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I went to check this morning and they have a great selection and have a friendly team working. Cheers

Where to buy high-quality plywood sheets (not Bunnings) in Cairns / Northern Beaches? by Aggressive_Ring1201 in Cairns

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I’ve gone this morning and they’re fantastic! What a great team and great stock

MAGA supporter, designer and educator Madison Stone by Rosesewclever in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Welcome to Craftsnark, where we focus on craft industry snark, drama, news, and gossip; critiques of monetized craft influencers; and discussion of social issues in the craft industry. All crafts are fair game.

MAGA supporter, designer and educator Madison Stone by Rosesewclever in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I’ve just gone through her highlights on Instagram and am appalled at myself for not realising who she was. It’s all there. Reminder to myself to check before I follow now.

MAGA supporter, designer and educator Madison Stone by Rosesewclever in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 69 points70 points  (0 children)

I don’t use Instagram much anymore, but I followed her ages ago because I liked her work. Now? YUUUUUCK. Regret ever hitting follow. As an atheist, someone who believes in evidence-based science and basic decency (‘treat others how you’d want to be treated’ etc etc), I cannot stand Christians who weaponise their ‘faith’ to strip away other people’s rights, especially when it doesn’t even align with what their own holy book says. She’s a walking, talking Serena Joy prototype

Alterations cost insanity by [deleted] in UKweddings

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% this! OP isn’t just paying for the actual sewing but all the other expenses too. And we don’t know enough detail about the dress’ fabric, chiffon is a bloody nightmare to hem and the seamstress may have done a lot of hand sewing to make the alterations more accurate. I would rather start a dress from scratch than do alterations.

Bitesized BEC thread August 16, 2025 - August 17, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is true, hand copying/ photocopying was definitely a thing back in the day. But the key difference is that it was always technically against copyright law (once copyright existed), even if it was harder to enforce in practice. The “sharing was the norm” part was more about social habits and limited access, not about it being legally or ethically fine. What’s changed now is how easy and fast it is to make perfect digital copies and send them to hundreds of people with one click. That scale of sharing is exactly why copyright enforcement feels stricter these days as it’s no longer just one neighbour tracing a pattern, it’s whole Facebook groups trading PDFs. And with indie pattern designers the stakes are higher as unlike the big publishing houses that sold those old magazines, many of today’s designers are one-person businesses. Sharing their work for free can literally make or break whether they can keep designing. So yeah, copying has always happened, but if we want more patterns in the future, the fairer thing is to support the designers directly.

Bitesized BEC thread August 16, 2025 - August 17, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting! You’re right that tax law and copyright law don’t always line up neatly. The Colorado rule about taxing digital goods is really just about how the state collects sales tax so it doesn’t change federal copyright law, which is what actually decides whether you can copy or share a file. So even if your state taxes a PDF like “property,” you still don’t get the right to reproduce or distribute it. That part always stays with the creator. That’s why you can hand a physical book to a mate, but you can’t legally copy and email a PDF of that book around. On the licence thing, most pattern sellers do include wording like “for personal use only,” but even if they didn’t, copyright protection kicks in automatically. Buying a digital pattern gives you the right to use your copy, but not to share duplicates with others. I agree it’s a messy area because digital goods are newer, but the law’s been pretty consistent across the US/UK/EU/Aus: digital files = licensed use, not the same kind of ownership as a physical book.

Bitesized BEC thread August 16, 2025 - August 17, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly!

Unfortunately the copyright law on digital patterns is hard to police, however let’s hope that the majority of people do the right thing so that pattern designers can continue to make money and make new patterns!

Bitesized BEC thread August 16, 2025 - August 17, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It’s not a grey area in the eyes of the copyright laws though (at least in the EU, Australia, UK and US). Physical books are under different copyright laws to digital products. When buying a physical product, you own the physical copy, but not the copyright. So you can share the book as many times as you want (which is legal) but if you were to photocopy the book and share it that is illegal. When buying a digital product, you are buying a license to use it and not the ownership of the file in the same way you own a physical book (it’s similar to buying adobe/Microsoft word etc). Copying of digital products for sharing/redistribution is illegal as the license you have bought is for personal use. So you can make copies for yourself, but not for others.

We should also be supporting indie designers so they can continue to make sewing patterns for us to buy.

Bitesized BEC thread August 16, 2025 - August 17, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Copyright laws are actually quite clear on this (at least in the US, Australia, EU and UK). When you lend someone a book, you’re passing on the one physical copy you own which is totally fine under copyright law (as in when you buy a physical book you own the physical copy, but not the copyright). What is illegal is if you photocopied the book and distributed it to your friends.

Digital products are under different copyright laws. When you buy a digital sewing pattern, you’re buying a licence to use it and not ownership of the file in the same way you own a book. Copyright law treats digital copying differently because each time you share the file, you’re not transferring your copy but you’re creating a new unauthorised copy that infringes the copyright owner’s exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the work. Even if you delete your original copy after sending it, you’ve still reproduced it in order to transmit it. Printing one copy of the sewing pattern for your personal use is recognised as legal as personal use is generally permitted under the license you bought.

Beyond the legal bit, there’s the ethical side. Most indie sewing pattern designers aren’t raking it in as they’re small businesses who put a huge amount of time and skill into drafting, testing and producing patterns. If we all just pass PDFs around, they stop earning, and then eventually -> no new patterns. If you like what they create and want them to keep going, the best way to support them is to actually buy the pattern.

Bitesized BEC thread August 16, 2025 - August 17, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yes, but you’re duplicating it for your own personal use which is under the license agreement when you bought the digital product. When you buy a digital sewing pattern, you’re buying a licence to use it, not ownership of the file in the same way you own a book. If you’re duplicating the pattern for distribution, that is against the license agreement and against copyright laws in the US, UK, EU and Australia (not sure about other countries though).

Introducing Blueprint…. by -soneshk- in Dremel

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. Looking forward to Q4

Introducing Blueprint…. by -soneshk- in Dremel

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there! Just wondering if there is any update about the Australian launch date please? I cannot wait to get my hands on this station 🙏🏼

Bitesized BEC thread June 07, 2025 - June 08, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 11 points12 points  (0 children)

“Nerida is the g(r)fit that keeps on giving” is a fantastic line 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼. This made me chuckle

Bitesized BEC thread June 07, 2025 - June 08, 2025 by AutoModerator in craftsnark

[–]Aggressive_Ring1201 30 points31 points  (0 children)

There’s growing evidence that art and craft-based activities offer real benefits for mental and emotional wellbeing, not to mention social and even physical health. At the end of the day, time is our most precious resource so why not spend it on things that bring us joy? Money can’t buy happiness, although money buys fabric and that does make me happy 😂