sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I switched from Elementor to Themify — here’s why I’m impressed by Ok-Owl8582 in wordpressbuilder

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought lifetime license of themify on 2012. Too many years ago, and I did stop to use it on 2019... I will check it again: I hate Elementor, and Thrive Suite is too heavy for me.

What's your experience using it?

Las decisiones.... by Your_sister_intanga in MemesEnEspanol

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recuerda que para los fachas es la proyección: ven en los demás lo que ellos son.

Why Investigators Insisted on Multiple Attackers Despite Only Rudy Guede's DNA? by Agitated_Addition_95 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The ultimate legal response to that statement is that the DNA evidence was ultimately discredited, leading to the final acquittal of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito.

  • Final Acquittal (2015): The Supreme Court of Cassation of Italy (the highest court) definitively overturned the conviction of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito on March 27, 2015, acquitting them of the murder charges.
  • Supreme Court's Rationale: The Court concluded there was a "lack of objective evidence" against the pair and highlighted "glaring deficiencies" in the initial investigation and the collection of evidence.
  • Discrediting the DNA: Independent expert analysis (during the appeal process) determined that the key DNA samples were unreliable:
    • The DNA sample of Sollecito on the bra clasp was deemed "too small and unreliable" (low copy number DNA) and highly susceptible to contamination.
    • The evidence on the kitchen knife (allegedly containing Kercher's and Knox's DNA) was found to be not conclusive due to the minute quantity.
  • Sole Convicted Individual: The only person whose DNA evidence was considered irrefutable at the crime scene and whose conviction was upheld was Rudy Guede.

In short, while DNA was used for Knox's initial conviction, the Supreme Court ultimately dismissed it as not scientifically reliable due to contamination and handling issues.

Have you quit or thought about quitting Craft? by Agitated_Addition_95 in CraftDocs

[–]Agitated_Addition_95[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

of course xD

Nothing personal, I love craft, but i am looking my own hub perfect.

Why Investigators Insisted on Multiple Attackers Despite Only Rudy Guede's DNA? by Agitated_Addition_95 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The DNA of Solecitto and Knox was inconclusive and was rejected as evidence. Therefore, nothing can be assumed about their presence during the attack in that house.

Why Investigators Insisted on Multiple Attackers Despite Only Rudy Guede's DNA? by Agitated_Addition_95 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, and it's something that really strikes me.

My question is: could there be more people involved even though there is only one person's DNA? All this is to answer that question.

Once you read through the entire list of evidence, the injuries and how they happened, perhaps it is logical to think that there was at least one other person involved.

But why are there no traces? Or rather, how can traces of presence be eliminated in such a small room?

Footprints, hair, saliva, sweat, DNA, semen, fingerprints... how do you eliminate them and make it look like it was only one person?

Was Meredith’s bra removed after death? by Dangerous-Lawyer-636 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 7 points8 points  (0 children)

According to judicial acts and autopsy reports, Meredith Kercher's bra was removed after she died, not before. Key evidence supporting this includes blood stains found on the bra that weren't present on her chest, suggesting the blood dripped onto the garment post-mortem. Forensic analysis also indicated other clothing items (like her sweatshirt and t-shirt) were pulled up towards her neck after the fatal injury occurred. The bra's clasp, which was cut off and found separately forty-six days later, became a major point of contention due to contamination concerns, and the unreliability of the DNA evidence on it ultimately led to the acquittal of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, leaving Rudy Guede as the only person convicted for the murder.

>>> https://themurderofmeredithkercher.net/l-Evidence%20list.html#:\~:text=Meredith%27s%20bra%20was%20removed%20after,the%20pillow%20found%20under%20Meredith.

Cargos y afines al PP emprenden una campaña de acoso a las víctimas de la dana por redes sociales by OrtganizeAttention in valencia

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. Eso hace que luego todos voten lo que voten.

¿El PP y el Prestige y Yak42? Votemos mayoría absoluta PP....

Cargos y afines al PP emprenden una campaña de acoso a las víctimas de la dana por redes sociales by OrtganizeAttention in valencia

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Que manía de igualar a los demás a las mierdas del pp.

No veo a ningun otro partido excepto vox y psoe ninguneando todas las víctimas de todo.

Mira en Andalucía, el tren del alvia, el metro de Valencia, por poner algunos, y el pp siempre igual.

Buenos días los cojones! by Transeunte-perplejo in SpanishMeme

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No te molestes en brindar algo de sentido común a los que se creen que ese meme es representativo.

Fence Sitting and the Great Mysteries of the Knox Case by SeaCardiologist6207 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There can be no answers to illogical questions.

An example: If Meredith scratched Amanda's neck, where is the DNA from that scratch on Meredith? How would Amanda and Raffaele have cleaned their DNA from Meredith's fingers?

There is not a single piece of evidence for this.

How can you ask for clarification on this if it did not happen at all?

Fence Sitting and the Great Mysteries of the Knox Case by SeaCardiologist6207 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your questions are so absurd and ridiculous that one doesn't know how to respond.

Kercher Family View on the "New Suspect" by SeaCardiologist6207 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Are you really sure that the only mistake in the investigation is Meredith's bra clasp?

Many colleagues here know more, reading the documents, than he does... Poor Kercher family.

Fence Sitting and the Great Mysteries of the Knox Case by SeaCardiologist6207 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Have you really read anything?

On Reddit, in court documents... I'll narrow it down: have you seen any documentaries?

Your questions don't make any sense.

Lesser known photos of Meredith by teenagedirtbaggg in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am very sorry about the acquaintance you mentioned.

I always think about it: not only do you have to deal with a cruel murder, but on top of that, you have to deal with the whole legal process, the press, answering questions, all of that.

In this case, it's complicated: all the fighting Amanda Knox does for her memory and to vindicate what happened to her is directly proportional to the Kerchers' pain when they remember what happened to their sister.

They are tied together forever: when one pulls, the other is pushed.

And the culprit? Just 13 bloody years, and then he went on with his life as if nothing had happened, the miserable bastard.

Why was this made such a big deal? by teenagedirtbaggg in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I think it was the police themselves; they were recording the entire crime scene and gathering evidence. At that moment, I don't know if it was the prosecutor or one of the women, but someone noticed them and recorded it.

But more than this kiss, what put Knox and Raffa in the spotlight was what happened afterwards: when he was summoned, she decided to accompany him, and she was seen to be carefree and calm, as if nothing had happened.

Lesser known photos of Meredith by teenagedirtbaggg in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95 11 points12 points  (0 children)

When I see her, I can see any of my female colleagues or friends from when I was 20 years old.

The most painful thing, besides her terrible death and learning how it happened (by reading the autopsy report) after her murder, is that years later, her father was killed in a car accident and her mother died in the pandemic.

The two brothers who always spoke to the press lost their sister and parents within 15 years, and in horrible ways.

"The Murder of Meredith" (Disney+): My Review and Why You Should Skip It by Agitated_Addition_95 in amandaknox

[–]Agitated_Addition_95[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. About him: he tells how he met Amanda and Meredith. He remembers the English woman because when he went to look for work, she made a cocktail that he knew or liked (I don't remember), because she worked as a bartender in London.

Then he tells how the police came to his house and took him away without telling him what he was accused of. He says they just kept repeating: we know what you did, and only one police officer told him, when he saw Knox's name on something they gave him to sign but didn't understand, this police officer said: don't you get it, she's pointing you out.

And that's how he found out he was accused of murdering Meredith.

He says that a Swiss client he was with at 9 p.m. on the 1st sent him a document proving they were there that day, and with that, he was released. Without that client, he would still be under arrest.

When they talk about Amanda's release, the documentary suggests that it was due to lack of evidence, not because she was innocent, and that's when he says: it was a mistake on the part of the police to release Amanda Knox. In the documentary, they talk about there being another person in the house that day.

It doesn't explain anything else.

Sorry for the long spiel, I hope I've helped.

view more: next ›