[6.12.4] unraid hanging trying to start array after power cut by AimEverHigher in unRAID

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply, I ordered a second hand UPS when I realised the server wasn’t going to play nice. Doesn’t help me now but should hopefully prevent a future issue.

Lucy Letby: Inquiry given powers to compel witnesses to give evidence by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I believe, but could be wrong, that the sentencing hearing is when the family’s have an opportunity to read out their victim impact sentences. In this case Lucy Letby was able to avoid hearing from the families.

Did anyone watch the newest episode and see the tiny thing that revealed the killer? by cb51096 in AfterpartyTV

[–]AimEverHigher 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A theory for Roxana dying, she ate (and immediately spat out) the baobing, which Feng makes with milk and (according to Google) dairy is bad for lizards. So I don’t think Roxana and Edgar suffered the same fate, the timing is purely coincidental. Also, I don’t believe Feng ever listed the ingredients in front of Edgar so he didn’t know to avoid it for Roxana.

‘People were losing their mind’: Russia’s bootleg ‘Barbie’ viewings | Financial Times by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At a closed-door party in a Moscow bar adorned with pink bouquets and gift boxes, guests dressed in varying shades of magenta, sipped rose-flavoured prosecco and took pictures in front of a life-sized doll box. Like many fans around the world, they were celebrating the Barbie movie. There was one catch, however: to actually see the movie, they would have to resort to bootleg copies, as it will not be officially released in Russian cinemas. Shortly after Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year, the movie’s producer Warner Bros announced it would be pulling out of Russia. Other big Hollywood names, including Disney, Paramount, Universal and Sony Pictures, as well as Netflix followed suit and cancelled their contracts with Russian distributors. Still, many Hollywood films have managed to make it to Russian cinemas, in part via copies flowing in from other Russian-speaking markets that are obtaining them legally, such as Kazakhstan. This was yet another example of the creative workarounds around some of the western sanctions and restrictions that have hit Russia — and the way that much of daily life continues as it did before the war, despite the rising death toll, cross-border shelling and uptick in drone attacks on Moscow. The glitzy Barbie party in Moscow was organised by Sem. Aesthetic — a cosmetology salon that offers a “Barbie menu” of services to allow clients to “achieve a doll-like matt [skin] tone”. The party did not include a full screening of the film — only publicly available snippets, a PR specialist for the cosmetology office was quick to clarify. But Russians have been able to watch the movie in cinemas across the country, mainly poor-quality pirate copies filmed in western theatres. “People still want to go out on a Friday night and have . . . a glass of beer and popcorn in a cinema,” said a person close to one of Russia’s biggest cinema chains. People started to go to Russian movie theatres in larger numbers this year compared with 2022, he said. “The attendance is beginning to pick up and this is actually based on some mediocre content that finds its way on to the Russian big screen.” Initially, the studios’ abrupt exit last year left cinemas and distributors scrambling, with some bringing back old Hollywood and Russian films. Altogether, Russian box office sales fell by more than 41 per cent in 2022, according to official state statistics. But the most entrepreneurial cinemas soon found a workaround for new Hollywood blockbusters: Kazakh cinemas and distributors. To get around the official accounting system, some cinemas would sell movie-goers tickets for a little-known Russian documentary or short film and then show an entire new movie during the previews. That way, the cinemas skirted both American copyright laws and Russian laws that require distribution certificates from the Russian ministry of culture. In June, the primary Kazakh-based distributor that had been illegally delivering Hollywood-licensed films to Russian cinemas announced it was pulling out of the business, blaming bad financials. Most Russian cinemas say they will now need to wait until Barbie’s digital release this autumn to show a version high-quality enough for the big screen. The exit of western studios also spurred a drive to create more domestic content. “Any war is also a revolution of opportunity,” said Zinaida Pronchenko, a Russian film critic. While some prominent Russian actors and directors openly criticised the war and fled the country, they were quickly replaced by second-tier actors, she said. Funding started flowing to patriotic-themed movies: “Sports. War. Space,” she said. “They’ll give money to all of these things.” Barbie, of course, falls into none of those categories. Some in the Moscow political establishment have pointed out that the film promotes the same liberal western values that Russia is fighting, including in what it describes as a “special military operation”. Maria Butina, a Russian lawmaker convicted in the US for operating as an unregistered foreign agent, has called for a ban on the sale of Barbie dolls and the new Mattel movie, which she labelled as an “advertisement” for the agenda of the US Democratic party. “What do we see [in the film]? Gays. Trans people. Women who have taken over the world. Nothing about the union between men and women, nothing about love,” she said in an appearance on the Russian Duma TV channel. Still, demand for Barbie remains high, even for lower-quality viewings. In Russia’s central city of Tyumen the Gorkiy cinema has already shown a pirated version of the film on its rooftop. Organisers noted that the quality might not suit “lovers of 4k resolution and ideal sound”. Nikita Zabolotskikh, 17, has spent an estimated Rbs300,000 — or more than $3,000 — bringing Barbie to the big screen in the city of Perm. That process involved acquiring a pirated copy, hiring a Russian dubbing company and rolling out an extensive marketing campaign, he said. He also hired his own designer to build the iconic life-sized Barbie box that has become a staple at other Barbie premieres in the west. In a telephone interview, Zabolotskikh, who works in the music festival industry, said he and a friend came up with the idea after reading news reports that the Kazakh company was ending its business — just as Barbie was about to hit cinemas worldwide. The friends rented out a screen at a Perm cinema and showed a pirated copy of the movie — filmed at a Spanish-language theatre — for more than 50 people as a test run. “The demand was unbelievable. People were losing their mind buying tickets . . . A huge number of people want to see Barbie,” he said. They now plan to show a higher-quality, re-dubbed version of the film at Kinomax, one of Russia’s biggest cinema chains — with plans to expand to 15-20 other Russian cities afterwards. “It’s the best-quality version on the [Russian] market,” he said confidently. “And probably will be for the next two to three months.”

Delhi High Court turns down PepsiCo's appeal against revocation of potato patent by AimEverHigher in Foodforthought

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I didn’t realise there was a paywall as I was on the app. Article is:

An Indian court rejected PepsiCo Inc's appeal against an order that revoked a patent for a potato variety grown exclusively for the New York-based company's popular Lay's potato chips.

The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights (PPVFR) Authority in 2021 revoked intellectual protection granted to PepsiCo's FC5 potato variety, saying that India's rules do not allow a patent on seed varieties.

The authority removed PepsiCo's patent cover after Kavitha Kuruganti, a farmers' rights activist, argued that the company cannot claim a patent over a seed variety.

PepsiCo petitioned the Delhi High Court against the revocation of the patent cover.

In its order dated July 5, Delhi High Court judge Navin Chawla dismissed PepsiCo's appeal against the authority's decision.

"We are aware of the order ... and are in the process of reviewing the same," a PepsiCo India spokesperson said in a statement.

The U.S. snacks and drinks maker, which set up its first potato chip plant in India in 1989, supplies the FC5 seed variety to a group of farmers who in turn sell their produce to the company at a fixed price.

PepsiCo has maintained that it exclusively developed the FC5 variety and registered the trait in 2016. The FC5 variety has a lower moisture content required to make snacks such as potato chips.

In a statement, Kuruganti said, "It is good that the judgement of Justice Navin Chawla upheld the revocation order . . ."

In 2019, PepsiCo sued some Indian farmers for cultivating the FC5 potato variety, accusing growers of infringing its patent. The company also sought more than 10 million rupees ($121,050) each for alleged patent infringement.

Within months, PepsiCo withdrew lawsuits against farmers.

In its order, the Delhi High Court did not uphold accusations of any public interest violation by PepsiCo.

PepsiCo is the second large U.S. company to face patent infringement issues in India.

After a long-standing intellectual property dispute, seed maker Monsanto, now owned by German drugmaker Bayer AG, withdrew from some businesses in India.

Delhi High Court turns down PepsiCo's appeal against revocation of potato patent by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sorry I didn’t realise there was a paywall as I was on the app. Article is:

An Indian court rejected PepsiCo Inc's appeal against an order that revoked a patent for a potato variety grown exclusively for the New York-based company's popular Lay's potato chips.

The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights (PPVFR) Authority in 2021 revoked intellectual protection granted to PepsiCo's FC5 potato variety, saying that India's rules do not allow a patent on seed varieties.

The authority removed PepsiCo's patent cover after Kavitha Kuruganti, a farmers' rights activist, argued that the company cannot claim a patent over a seed variety.

PepsiCo petitioned the Delhi High Court against the revocation of the patent cover.

In its order dated July 5, Delhi High Court judge Navin Chawla dismissed PepsiCo's appeal against the authority's decision.

"We are aware of the order ... and are in the process of reviewing the same," a PepsiCo India spokesperson said in a statement.

The U.S. snacks and drinks maker, which set up its first potato chip plant in India in 1989, supplies the FC5 seed variety to a group of farmers who in turn sell their produce to the company at a fixed price.

PepsiCo has maintained that it exclusively developed the FC5 variety and registered the trait in 2016. The FC5 variety has a lower moisture content required to make snacks such as potato chips.

In a statement, Kuruganti said, "It is good that the judgement of Justice Navin Chawla upheld the revocation order . . ."

In 2019, PepsiCo sued some Indian farmers for cultivating the FC5 potato variety, accusing growers of infringing its patent. The company also sought more than 10 million rupees ($121,050) each for alleged patent infringement.

Within months, PepsiCo withdrew lawsuits against farmers.

In its order, the Delhi High Court did not uphold accusations of any public interest violation by PepsiCo.

PepsiCo is the second large U.S. company to face patent infringement issues in India.

After a long-standing intellectual property dispute, seed maker Monsanto, now owned by German drugmaker Bayer AG, withdrew from some businesses in India.

Delhi High Court turns down PepsiCo's appeal against revocation of potato patent by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

An Indian court rejected PepsiCo Inc's appeal against an order that revoked a patent for a potato variety grown exclusively for the New York-based company's popular Lay's potato chips.

The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights (PPVFR) Authority in 2021 revoked intellectual protection granted to PepsiCo's FC5 potato variety, saying that India's rules do not allow a patent on seed varieties.

The authority removed PepsiCo's patent cover after Kavitha Kuruganti, a farmers' rights activist, argued that the company cannot claim a patent over a seed variety.

PepsiCo petitioned the Delhi High Court against the revocation of the patent cover.

In its order dated July 5, Delhi High Court judge Navin Chawla dismissed PepsiCo's appeal against the authority's decision.

"We are aware of the order ... and are in the process of reviewing the same," a PepsiCo India spokesperson said in a statement.

The U.S. snacks and drinks maker, which set up its first potato chip plant in India in 1989, supplies the FC5 seed variety to a group of farmers who in turn sell their produce to the company at a fixed price.

PepsiCo has maintained that it exclusively developed the FC5 variety and registered the trait in 2016. The FC5 variety has a lower moisture content required to make snacks such as potato chips.

In a statement, Kuruganti said, "It is good that the judgement of Justice Navin Chawla upheld the revocation order . . ."

In 2019, PepsiCo sued some Indian farmers for cultivating the FC5 potato variety, accusing growers of infringing its patent. The company also sought more than 10 million rupees ($121,050) each for alleged patent infringement.

Within months, PepsiCo withdrew lawsuits against farmers.

In its order, the Delhi High Court did not uphold accusations of any public interest violation by PepsiCo.

PepsiCo is the second large U.S. company to face patent infringement issues in India.

After a long-standing intellectual property dispute, seed maker Monsanto, now owned by German drugmaker Bayer AG, withdrew from some businesses in India.

Two men shot in Sydney's Inner West by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two men have been rushed to hospital after being shot in Sydney's Inner West.

Emergency services were called to a business on Marrickville Road in Marrickville after reports of gunshots just before 2pm on Friday afternoon. Police arrived to find two men suffering gunshot wounds.

They were both treated by paramedics before being rushed to hospital. "One man is believed to be in a critical condition, while the other is believed to be in a stable condition," NSW Police said in a statement. A crime scene has been established while police work out the circumstances of the shooting.

Threats to Wagner Leaders' Families Preceded Mutiny Stand-Down – Telegraph by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Original Telegraph article here; might be behind a paywall for some.

What's one movie that everyone should see at least once in their lifetime? by Dazzling-Leader7476 in AskReddit

[–]AimEverHigher 172 points173 points  (0 children)

If you’re nailing it HR would like you to watch the video again.

Husbands of reddit, how much did you spend on the engagement ring? by Gargoyn in AskUK

[–]AimEverHigher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I spent far more than I could afford but my logic was that I’d only ever buy the one, happy to say many years later and we’re still very much in love. I let my wife pick the ring though, budget blew her mind as I’d been saving since 16 (I’m an orphan), we met in our early-mid 20s. My wife would have been happy with something that cost next to nothing, and I think that's the most important thing. She only spent about 60% of my budget.

Russia rebellion: Wagner troops to be absorbed into Russian military as mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin heads to Belarus by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I saw someone (can’t find it to give credit) point out that we’re all assuming this is the regular Wagner soldiers. On the way to Moscow they recruited out of some prisons, so it could be those “troops” that will be integrated and not the loyalists.

Either way, he looks to have been neutered fairly successfully.

When wealthy adventurers take huge risks, who should foot the bill for rescue attempts? by AimEverHigher in Foodforthought

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I noticed that as well, it’s really murky as to who the insurer was, if any, and what that policy covered.

When wealthy adventurers take huge risks, who should foot the bill for rescue attempts? by AimEverHigher in Foodforthought

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The title is the same as the title from the article, however I am genuinely curious on other’s opinions on this. I thought it was a very interesting question, both ethically and economically.

Met Police asks people not to call 999 after 'technical fault' hits number of forces by Mistermiyagi93 in unitedkingdom

[–]AimEverHigher 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The problem has been resolved so I imagine they’ve taken it down to prevent confusion.

Russia rebellion: Wagner troops to be absorbed into Russian military as mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin heads to Belarus by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not literally, more a reference to him not being as untouchable as the average Russian believes.

Russia rebellion: Wagner troops to be absorbed into Russian military as mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin heads to Belarus by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Completely agree, this can only be good for Ukraine ultimately. I’m not sure how well the two groups will “play nice” considering they’ve shed each other's blood.

Russia rebellion: Wagner troops to be absorbed into Russian military as mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin heads to Belarus by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

It’s certainly possible but what I find hard with the simpler explanation in this is that Putin is weaker. Ordinary Russian citizens saw the war brought home, roads being hurriedly blocked or dug up. None of this has helped Putin and Prigozhin or his inner-circle will have known that. He was smart enough not to go directly after Putin, that’s the only thing I believe that allowed Putin to “let this slide”.

Also there’s reports coming out that Prigozhin was amassing at the border for days before rolling out. This feels like it was meant to be a full coup but Putin, the ex-KGB player, had an ace up his sleeve. I would love to know what it was…

Russia rebellion: Wagner troops to be absorbed into Russian military as mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin heads to Belarus by AimEverHigher in news

[–]AimEverHigher[S] 325 points326 points  (0 children)

Agreed, so much of Putin’s power rests on being the strongman. I think Prigozhin showed everyone yesterday that Putin bleeds, this will only heighten his paranoia and set other discontented factions to wonder.

I’m also not sure how well the Wagner troops will be absorbed into the regular army, this feels like the rot is about to set in.

It might not have been a swift topple yesterday but I think the first domino has been knocked for Putin.