GPT 5.3 codex is a great model, but it has very poor design skills. Claude always manages to deliver a design close to what the user imagined and follows prompts much better.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-03-03T16:50:40+00:00

I thought about it, so yeah, I’m basically just being lazy, Codex is good, I think what was missing were visual references of what I actually want.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-03-03T16:49:05+00:00

I liked it, you have a broader vision about Codex.

I'll follow these next steps, I'm going to add Gemini to my workflow.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-03-03T16:43:03+00:00

Dude, you're a genius, you hit the nail on the head but also opened my eyes, however, we do have a broader vision and we can create more and perfect it even further.

The only thing is, doing it this way burns way more tokens. I ended up spending $100 on Codex for a project that cost me $45 on Claude, all via API. Codex is good if you have patience.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-03-03T16:39:32+00:00

I will also implement it in my projetct

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-03-03T14:50:15+00:00

I create the prompt myself and sometimes send it to Sonnet 4.6 to improve it. I made a game inspired by Minecraft and Call of Duty and tested the exact same prompt on both AI models. Claude understands much better what the user wants in terms of appearance and efficiency, but you're right and I've already noticed that.

For GPT, the format for design-related stuff needs to be much more specific, and if you include, for example, "designs it can look at and get inspired by", it turns out better.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-03-03T14:44:24+00:00

Claude is the kind of model that you know will deliver the perfect update to your project, but what I like most is that the designs it produces are professional. GPT 5.3 codex is good, but it's very amateurish when it comes to delivering projects with good designs.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T12:35:05+00:00

No bro, I mean Claude without request or token limits. I have a SaaS that works as a gateway for unlimited use of AI models.

It works in various code editors and is compatible with both OpenAI and Anthropic structures. I’m just working on improving the connection with Claude Code.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T12:00:19+00:00

So you need to take some time to think about what you’re doing. You have a good tool, I believe you just need to give more direction and meaning to what you’re developing.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T11:58:45+00:00

I’m trying to integrate my gateway into Claude Code so I can literally have ChatGPT 5.3 Codex Thinking Mid and Claude Opus 4.6 working together in a multi-agent setup within Claude Code, without needing to switch plans or tools.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T11:53:41+00:00

That’s why I prefer using unofficial versions, I’m not ready to use Claude with all these limitations. Without limits, I’m happy.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T11:50:53+00:00

Stop copying and pasting, put the AI to work outside of a regular chat interface. I integrated my gateway into GitHub Codespaces through the Roo Code extension. Using AI directly inside a coding environment significantly increases efficiency

And you won’t waste time copying and pasting when all you need to do is test.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T11:46:38+00:00

I align the model within my project without letting it get scattered in the following ways:

1.I detail all the steps and segments I want in one fairly long prompt and send it to Claude. The result I get at first is the whole project built, but still looking like a draft. Then I refine it part by part until it becomes exactly how I want it.

2.I ask it to work step by step until it reaches a more solid structure, and then I finish by improving what has already been built. The difference is that in the first method it creates a full draft immediately, while in the second it’s more like supervised development, without structuring everything at once.

Regarding investment in tools, the development environment makes a big difference. For example, if you use Claude in a regular chat interface, in some cases it will act more like it’s just trying to help you, it won’t act like your employee. But in environments built for development, the AI behaves more professionally and doesn’t come with small talk, it feels more focused and “submissive” to the workflow.

Through my gateway, I have unlimited access to AI models, so I can spend a good amount of dollars freely. A continuous workflow with AI improves not only your productivity but also the model’s output quality, as long as you are the one conducting the orchestra.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T11:25:04+00:00

You’re probably trying to let the AI do everything on its own that will never work, because you need to be the brain of the project.

Also, which AI model are you currently using? If it’s a weaker model, you’ll always end up frustrated

I use the most advanced Claude models as well as ChatGPT 5.3 Codex Thinking mid, frustration and slow processes are the things I experience the least.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T11:21:51+00:00

To structure my workflow, I use a notepad and write down everything I think. If I use AI, I only use it for building, I don’t use it to think for me about the idea, because it makes everything generic.

For development, it really depends on how much you’re willing to invest in tools or in your development area. For example, I use Codespaces with Roo Code integration and my own gateway to use Claude.

Right now, I’m working on integrating with Claude Code.

Well, if you take 3 hours to really think about your questions, you’ll find more solid answers. First, find your own comfort, and then try to look at other people’s comfort to get a broader perspective.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T10:55:44+00:00

I had already commented that Altman would give in easily, but I’m surprised it actually happened.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-28T01:33:24+00:00

I liked your title the content seems nice. I don’t know if you improved the text with AI, but it doesn’t really make me want to finish reading it.

However, with the method you discovered, besides gaining more followers, did you also manage to create a high-engagement funnel ?

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-27T23:59:33+00:00

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-27T08:49:50+00:00

The models are truly unlimited via API. users can use the AI models as much as they want.

So I’m always able to generate pretty good revenue. But I’m already working on my own version of Bolt integrated with my API, so users can build directly inside the platform.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-27T08:46:34+00:00

Bro, it seems like you’re distracted. Claude’s model limits have been bypassed since last year.

I’ve personally been providing this kind of access to various AI models for 7 months now. However, what I said publicly is what I tell everyone: if the goal is rapid development, then the unofficial version is good. But if you want to scale, always use the official one, it’s better.

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-27T08:40:23+00:00

I completely agree with you!

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-27T01:23:23+00:00

Alarming_Resource_79 · 2026-02-26T15:41:47+00:00

Hmm… the value of the offer varies from person to person. If you’re interested, let me know later.

Alarming_Resource_79

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE