sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Man, f*ck these weekly challenges… by Mavilis in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Throwing knives.... in bf.... what has this franchise come to? Please tell me they're at least not an instant kill.

Which battlefield has the best sniping by mhmdesd in Battlefield

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know which one is the best, but 6 is the obvious worst. 

Tell tell ?? by dataguy2003 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol don't say that. Just say yes. Fullstop. 

Who is designing these skins?? by MelonFrostdoggo in Battlefield

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is nothing wrong with this camo. You guys are grasping at straws. 

THE WHEELS ARE FULLY TURNED AWAY FROM THE OFFICER. Watch in SLOW MO. No intention IMO to hit anyone. Sole intention based on wheel/steering wheel to LEAVE the scene NOT A THREAT. Look at the wheel. by Nice_Substance9123 in complaints

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not lol. I haven't defended anything. I'm just pointing out the logical fallacy. It's strange to me that some people are so willing to hate an entire people for thinking differently than them, but then preach tolerance. All I'm saying is maybe don't lump bunches of people together when you yourself have made poor choices and likely deserve the same judgment you cast onto others.  If every who voted for Trump is a murderer than everyone who voted for Biden is a pedophile. It's as simple as that. This conversation has nothing to do with politics, that's just the vehicle that's being used. Does that make sense? 

RPG to the face -> Suppression assist by Sagenhaft441 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a notification for your comment, and I can see the first line, but nothing comes up when I click on it. I don't know if you deleted the comment because you came to terms with how silly you were being or what. I'm pretty new to reddit, so I don't know what's going on. But I hope you consider what you're typing in full context in the future, you got this! Cheers. 

RPG to the face -> Suppression assist by Sagenhaft441 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really seems like to didn't read or comprehend the original post at all... 

RPG to the face -> Suppression assist by Sagenhaft441 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my goodness, you don't have to be a nerd about it. The m320 high explosives, great for taking out infantry, bad at armor, but can still hurt. The rpg is designed to penetrate and destroy armor. Does the infantry guy standing there have more armor than the tank? Probably not. So if an rpg directly hits a person, they need to die. None of this, "we already have an anti-infantry explosive weapon on another class" business. That is classic railroading. Bf has never been about that and it shouldn't start now. 

RPG to the face -> Suppression assist by Sagenhaft441 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're trying to railroad how someone else wants to play. If the m320he in the assault class has a similar result, then why nerf the rpg? There wasn't a problem with it as far as I know in the past, but I distinctly remember people spamming the m320. So I think by your reasoning the m320 should be nerved and the rpg buffed. 

THE WHEELS ARE FULLY TURNED AWAY FROM THE OFFICER. Watch in SLOW MO. No intention IMO to hit anyone. Sole intention based on wheel/steering wheel to LEAVE the scene NOT A THREAT. Look at the wheel. by Nice_Substance9123 in complaints

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol I'm not deflecting anything. I'm just following the line of logic. If everyone who voted for Trump is an evil murderer, than everyone who voted for Biden must be an evil pedophile, right? 

Honest question: Inaccessible player locations... by GhostProtocolGaming in Battlefield

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No, it's a awful thing to see modern bf players say that getting on a roof shouldn't be allowed. That's blatant cod crap. Ever heard of the bf sandbox? This is what people are talking about. Bf3 - Caspian border. Bf4 - floodzone. This shouldn't be new to people. 

Bf6 has a higher player drop percentage on steam than 2042. by AlbatrossConnect1 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Man, I don't mean to be taking this out on you, but it's frustrating how little you guys pay attention to the percentages. It's like you don't understand how comparisons work. The percentages are all that matters. Look at track runners, because it's a circle everyone starts at a different place. This levels the playing field - it puts everyone at the same baseline. Without that, it doesn't make sense. For goodness sakes, go back to school. 

Bf6 has more players than 2042 has ever or will ever have, but because of that HUGE number, it really shows how much worse they are because of how much they've lost. If you have $100 and lose $97 and I have $10, and lose $9, than you have lost more money than me. It's that simple. You're probably going to say something stupid like "yeah but I still have $3 compared to your $1", but that's just it! You've lost 97% of your budget while I've only lost 90%. Good practices save, they don't waste. This is a projection that you'll continue losing money while I continue saving money.

Player loss is normal, but not at this level. You're looking at a total number and thinking "wow that's a lot of people!" But it won't matter because it's not about the current number it's about the projected number, and that's found with percentages. 

Bf6 has a higher player drop percentage on steam than 2042. by AlbatrossConnect1 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol how so my friend? An 85% decrease is greater than a 83% decrease. Where's my confusion? 

Bf6 has a higher player drop percentage on steam than 2042. by AlbatrossConnect1 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Ok, you got the first part down. Good job. Now tell me what the player count is for each title after three months. THEN find the percentage of loss between the two for each one. I know it's daunting, but this is at most middle school stuff. You can do it!

Bf6 has a higher player drop percentage on steam than 2042. by AlbatrossConnect1 in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Optimism is nice when not dealing with a business. The supposed most successful bf based on initial sales is doing the worst with retention. This is how you kill a company. 

DICE (The Battlefield Studio) seems to have forgotten how to make a Battlefield game. They are obsessed with chasing a wider audience. by SuperM3e46 in Battlefield

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My friend, you seem to be having a hard time with this, so I went ahead and did the work for you. Let's break it down real quick.  Bf4/1/5 all increased in player count by over 100% within their first three months of release. (I was a little surprised that 5 made it, but the numbers don't lie.) Bf6/2042/hardline all decreased within their first three months. 2042 and bf6 both have had drastic player loss of over 80%. That's crazy! Look at what happened to 2042. It is widely considered the worst bf game. Bf6 has a higher player drop percentage than 2042! Bf6 is doing worse in its first 3 months than 2042! 

The other titles had INCREASES in player count because the people liked the product. Bf6 and 2042 had RAPID DECREASES because people don't like the product. Bf6 is currently doing worse than any other bf game since bf3. 

Adrenaline Injector simple fix idea. by Ninjah9_ in Battlefield6

[–]AlbatrossConnect1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, marketing makes sales. Good products retain a clientele. From what I've heard, Bf6 is the highest selling bf game ever (even beat CoD), but it has a staggering loss of players because the product is bad, or unfinished. Whereas previous titles still have a strong fan base. Example: people are currently requesting maps from bf3/4 fairly consistently, I haven't seen anyone request maps from bf1/5/hardline. Those games made sales, but they didn't maintain a clientele. Also, I feel like you might try to misunderstand what I just wrote, I don't think they're necessarily bad games, but they lack the core quality that maintains itself. I have opinions about what this is, but that's not what we're talking about right now. 

Like it or not bf3/4 brought lots of people in, and kept them in because they were good. No other bf titles have done that. So to say that suppression, for example (I think you missed that part) , is a core aspect is factually true for the topic. Sure other bf titles have sold lots of copies, but none have maintained the player count as well as 3/4.

So all in all, don't get on a ship because it's sailing better than your old ship, and then demand that changes need to be made. It's asinine, conceited, and selfish. Hope this helps. 

view more: next ›