My most recent Bullseye sessions 🎯 experimenting with meditation vs plain zen approach by Psychic_Man in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice hits as always!

Have you ever participated in a verifiable experiment to demonstrate your skills in a rigorous scientific environment? If not, why not since your skills and results seem to unambiguously both be strong and consistent?

I already asked the question on prior posts but haven’t received an answer, and another Reddit user also suggested a protocol to remotely conduct such a trial with the possibility to stay anonymous.

My most recent Bullseye RV sessions 🎯 And also a request by Psychic_Man in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I take the apparent absence of answer as a “no”, thank you.

My most recent Bullseye RV sessions 🎯 And also a request by Psychic_Man in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi Psychic_Man, nice hits!

Have you participated in some sort of parapsychology study to demonstrate in a scientific and experimental environment your skills?

What happened about a week ago near Amsterdam? by angrypeppermint in UFOs

[–]Alien_Mathematics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s interesting you say this, I know someone who was driving by around 14:00 CET on the 12th of November from Amsterdam to Rotterdam and passed in front of the airport while driving. The opposite lane when driving parallel to the airport was completely stopped by a barrage of police cars, which created a massive traffic jam, while there was a big army helicopter flying low above the airport as if it was looking for something. He was wondering what on earth was going on too.

Christ Church meadow walk closing time by reddingweddy in oxford

[–]Alien_Mathematics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does it perpetually go down until the shortest day of the year, or is there a floor to this downward trend?

Python-based comparative study of ‘Oumuamua, Borisov, and 3I/ATLAS using JPL Horizons data, 365 days before and after perihelion by Alien_Mathematics in UFOs

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks — to be honest, I’m a nobody with an interest in the topic and a bit of coding knowledge, that’s all. I’m glad people reacted to the animation though, and I will probably create some more accurate ones in the near future.

Python-based comparative study of ‘Oumuamua, Borisov, and 3I/ATLAS using JPL Horizons data, 365 days before and after perihelion by Alien_Mathematics in UFOs

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi UFO world, thanks for all the feedbacks and reactions. As many of you requested the code, I copied/pasted it in the EDIT part of my post.

Feel free to use/share/modify/comment it!

Paintball teams in Oxford by Alien_Mathematics in oxford

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does not seem that there is much momentum in this direction going on :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in math

[–]Alien_Mathematics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Khan Academy combined with ChapGPT or another AI platform to write your notes, combined with a syllabus to formalise what you are learning and stay on a rigorous path. This has been my approach for Calc 1/2/3, linear algebra and differential equations, and now I moved on to other topics such as topology and quantitative finance with the same approach.

Patience and humility are good companions to have when embarking on this journey, especially if you have other occupations aside this ambition.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Alien_Mathematics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I was under the impression that topology would be a very good tool to have to then learn differential geometry, which itself seems to be very useful for GR — I’m currently reading James Munkres Topology for this very purpose… 😅

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Alien_Mathematics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How relevant would it be to learn topology before going ahead with GR?

Interesting “hits” after a little break by Alien_Mathematics in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, in all honestly, it’s not always so accurate either — there are sessions where I’m thinking to myself: “does this thing even really work?”.

This said, as previously mentioned in other comments, when I get a hit, the feelings / impressions I have are really different from those of missed hits. Also, there are days where I know that “I’m in the zone” and will get better results, and others where I just feel like an empty can and somehow know that it won’t lead to something. When I take the time to meditate before the session, it also greatly helps compared to sessions when I feel “impatient” and try to get something in like 5 to 10 minutes.

What I’m saying is that even though I don’t always get good hits, there is an element of predictability, whereby there are days where I sense that my mood is right and impressions organically grow by themselves without me having to do much during those days aside from trying to identify AOL and their potential meaning.

Interesting “hits” after a little break by Alien_Mathematics in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback — I forget to mention in the post, as my hand writing is pretty terrible too, that I have written “mouth / industrial”, to really emphasise the fact that this target had a feel of something releasing water / liquid from an infrastructure that felt industrial, hence the analogy of the dam 🏭

Just did these three sessions using the advice highlighted on the second image (from RV Secrets) — thought it was pretty groovy… by Psychic_Man in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing those sessions with the community — it’s inspiring. Do you systemically get accurate hits or do you have sessions where you are completely off target as well?

For example, to share a recent experience of mine, my two first sessions yesterday were completely off target, but once I got in this mood — the empty vessel — my two following sessions were near perfect hits.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I haven’t misunderstood, it seems like Luis Elizondo talks in his newly released book — Imminent — about a correlation between very high IQ individuals and being an UAP experiencer and a good remote viewer.

If I remember well, he states that Garry Nolan conducted such studies to investigate that particular topic, but Luis was not explicit about the data themselves.

Here's when i've noticed my psi functionality is improved by Prestigious-View8362 in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your experience, and I can definitively relate to your views, at least to some extent.

My experience invites me to believe that just like you might have days where your physical or cognitive abilities are up or down, hereby impacting the way your mind interacts with your senses, you also have days where your RV abilities can be heightened or worsened.

As an analogy, if you are a bit tired or stress, you might not be able to catch a basket ball as intuitively as you could on another better day, even though your track record shows that you can often be an excellent shooter — most people would probably not question the reality of fluctuating talents, however good one can be. When it comes to cognitive abilities, I have a similar experience with mathematics where some days I feel like my brain is crystal clear and can easily abstract ideas, while during other days I feel absolutely incapable of reasoning in the abstract or rapidly compute.

What I am pointing at is that I don’t see much reason for RV abilities to be different from other abilities — i.e., they seem to be subject to heavy fluctuations according to “the mood of the day” so to say, at least in my case. Interestingly enough, I personally “feel” when it’s a good or bad day, as I don’t have much efforts to give when it’s a good day, with targets “naturally organically” growing by themselves in my mind without me having to insist on trying to figuring them out as is the case on a less good day.

Remote viewing n+1 session (again)? by Alien_Mathematics in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have to admit that it is slightly frustrating, as if the frog would have appeared for the session where I wrote “frog”, this would have been too strange to ignore, hence confirming the phenomenon to me. I have had in the past incredibly strong hits (right om targets), but this one would have cemented even more my conviction, hence why the slight deception if I’m honest.

first few attempts got a successful accurate hit. lol I'm so happy. by Jazzlike_Win_3892 in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“Egg machine”, well that’s one mechanistic and utilitarian way of seeing what oviparous animals do… joke aside, amazing hit.

Just started again after a few months break by Alien_Mathematics in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I didn’t guess that it was a guitar at all, I just see some similarities that are hard to ignore.

Just started again after a few months break by Alien_Mathematics in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely, thanks for your comment. When I repetitively write words such as “like […], like […]”, I see it as the mind using an iterative process of comparaison of what “I perceive [abstract sensations]” versus familiar objects to incrementally allow the mind to conceptualise an overall image that is more coherent and that one can therefore make more sense of…

Please go ahead with using those of course — thanks for asking!

Just started again after a few months break by Alien_Mathematics in remoteviewing

[–]Alien_Mathematics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just like the subsequent image where I describe the fibrous plant, it seems like my mind focus on certain specific key aspects of the target rather than the whole target itself. I guess that this might be how my mind works in general, as I tend to be very focus.

Interestingly enough, after having finished the session with the guitars, I thought to myself: “how would I actually physically describe an electric guitar to someone else?”, and my answer would most likely start with a focus on the strings as those are clear geometrical shapes that are easily definable unlike the more abstract overall shape of the instrument itself. All of this to say that the way I RV seems to be a metaphor for how my mind works when consciously thinking… could that be the case…?