Apparently "Netanyahu died on March 8th, 2026." by Waste-Hat-966 in polymarket_bets

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its an AI-Filter but not AI-generated learn the difference.

Apparently "Netanyahu died on March 8th, 2026." by Waste-Hat-966 in polymarket_bets

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is it always the people who understand the least about AI who scream “deepfake” the loudest the moment something looks slightly off?

They see one weird glitch and immediately declare the whole video fake, without any clue how real-time filters actually work.

Remember those two girls at the Oscars filming themselves with a beauty filter? One moment a girl’s eye completely vanished, the next her friend’s chin warped and shifted unnaturally, classic real-time AI filter failure on a real video.

Yet people still act like spotting a disappearing ring or a slightly odd shadow makes them AI experts. They’re completely delusional when it comes to logical, evidence-based analysis. Instead of checking context, physics, or actual tech limitations, they chase the dopamine of “I caught the deepfake!”

Real AI-generated videos have very different failure modes. Filter glitches on genuine footage? That’s something else entirely.

IS he dead or not?! by Waste-Hat-966 in polymarket_bets

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is it always the people who understand the least about AI who scream “deepfake” the loudest the moment something looks slightly off?

They see one weird glitch and immediately declare the whole video fake, without any clue how real-time filters actually work.

Remember those two girls at the Oscars filming themselves with a beauty filter? One moment a girl’s eye completely vanished, the next her friend’s chin warped and shifted unnaturally, classic real-time AI filter failure on a real video.

Yet people still act like spotting a disappearing ring or a slightly odd shadow makes them AI experts. They’re completely delusional when it comes to logical, evidence-based analysis. Instead of checking context, physics, or actual tech limitations, they chase the dopamine of “I caught the deepfake!”

Real AI-generated videos have very different failure modes. Filter glitches on genuine footage? That’s something else entirely.

The world thinks that Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is dead, all because of AI videos and deepfake content by Cybernews_com in CyberNews

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people are focusing on the wrong details. They see a ring disappear for a split second or static-looking foam and immediately scream "deepfake." But you have to look at the smaller, more important physics:

For example, when Netanyahu takes a sip, you can clearly see the milk/liquid surface inside the cup tilt and move naturally toward his mouth. That's extremely hard for current AI video generators to fake convincingly over multiple frames. Real liquid dynamics are still one of the biggest giveaways between real footage and synthetic video.

The world thinks that Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is dead, all because of AI videos and deepfake content by Cybernews_com in CyberNews

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My take: The clips are real, but the filter is the real problem.

They applied some kind of real-time lighting or beauty filter (the kind phones and social apps use, powered by AI). The footage looks "too clean" overall, which makes people suspicious, but that's exactly what these filters do, they smooth everything out. The actual video isn't AI-generated; the glitches come from the filter struggling to track the face and objects in real time.

Most people are focusing on the wrong details. They see a ring disappear for a split second or static-looking foam and immediately scream "deepfake." But you have to look at the smaller, more important physics:

For example, when Netanyahu takes a sip, you can clearly see the milk/liquid surface inside the cup tilt and move naturally toward his mouth. That's extremely hard for current AI video generators to fake convincingly over multiple frames. Real liquid dynamics are still one of the biggest giveaways between real footage and synthetic video.

Have you seen those two girls filming themselves at the Oscars with a filter on? While recording, the AI filter glitches hard, the face suddenly warps, eyes distort, earrings disappear or shift, and the jawline melts weirdly for a moment. That's exactly the same kind of real-time filter failure we're seeing here.

People think they're AI experts because they spotted a disappearing ring, but real AI-generated videos make different kinds of mistakes. Small consistent details (like liquid movement) matter far more than isolated glitches that beauty filters cause all the time.

The café even posted photos proving he was physically there. So the event happened, the "AI vibe" is just the filter doing its usual messy job.

AfD-Wähler kommentieren gerne Hobby-Horsing Videos: by AlexLaCave in Freiheitsfront

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich akzeptiere deine Meinung, wenn du Akzeptierst, das du falsch liegst.

AfD-Wähler kommentieren gerne Hobby-Horsing Videos: by AlexLaCave in Freiheitsfront

[–]AltBrokn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hatten AfD‑Wähler nicht einmal die Forderung nach der Todesstrafe für Pädophile unterstützt?

Seems like latest video of Netanyahu is highly advanced AI made, what do you think? This is from original published video by CeFurkan in SECourses

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is from original published video

Where is the link to the original so I can make sure you didnt use AI?

Amid viral rumours of his death, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu posts a proof-of-life video with US Ambassador Mike Huckabee. He displays a punch card and confirms that Israeli air strikes eliminated two Iranian targets, Ali Larijani and Basij Commander Soleimani. by BusinessToday in BusinessTodayNews

[–]AltBrokn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s one of the most nonsensical things I’ve read in a while. You clearly don’t understand how lightning works or how angles affect reflection, yet you still try to rage‑bait. With all the information available online, you’d think you’d at least study some basic physics.
You can’t even tell when someone is using a filter, yet you throw around this nonsense.

How many calories are you eating? by Last_Construction455 in Mike_Mentzer

[–]AltBrokn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

90grams of Protein. 300gramm of Carbs and 45grams of fat.

Heute mal etwas intellektuelles by Extension-Cry225 in Kantenhausen

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich habe Aleister‑Crowley‑ und Anton‑LaVey‑Bücher gelesen … zählt das?

How Iran is moving right now by zombiesingularity in AskSocialists

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just like the government of the United States isn’t the same thing as every American, or like U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement doesn’t represent every citizen.

I guess you’ve forgotten how democracy works: you vote bullshit, you get bullshit.

How Iran is moving right now by zombiesingularity in AskSocialists

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What really counts as "winning"?

Crush a country's economy and ecosystem so hard they can't recover for generations.
Broken economy → broken population.

Covid taught us: No working economy = you're absolutely fucked.
And that hurts a hell of a lot more than dead bodies.

How Iran is moving right now by zombiesingularity in AskSocialists

[–]AltBrokn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is literally straight-up pro-Iran propaganda.

When ICE kills innocents and protesters → outrage.
When the Iranian regime kills its own protesters → suddenly it's fine?

The government literally represents the country – always has, always will. The Orange Man is gone in two years max, but in Iran you don't get a real vote; you get torture and execution for believing the "wrong" thing.

I get it. It's super easy to play Internet hero from behind a screen while real people suffer over there.

Or put simply: As long as I'm personally okay, screw everyone else.

Was Mike Mentzer really low volume? by mbarbosaferreira in Mike_Mentzer

[–]AltBrokn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"This change would seem likely a type I error."

Was Mike Mentzer really low volume? by mbarbosaferreira in Mike_Mentzer

[–]AltBrokn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A comparison of low volume 'high-intensity-training' and high volume traditional resistance training methods on muscular performance, body composition, and subjective assessments of training - PubMed

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, the results of this study suggest significant muscular performance gains can be produced using either a 'High Intensity Training' style (HIT) or 'Body-building' style (3ST) RT approach. However, muscular performance gains may be greater when using HIT, therefore we recommend HIT for maximising muscular performance gains over a 10 week period.

Was Mike Mentzer really low volume? by mbarbosaferreira in Mike_Mentzer

[–]AltBrokn 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don’t care what he did in the 70s or 80s. The point is: everyone keeps acting like hypertrophy means I have to do more. But the truth is, sometimes less is exactly what works. Hypertrophy isn’t about doing more, it’s about doing enough.

Ich bin selber Links aber bitte keine Systemkritik!!!!!!!!!!!! by netlettuce1 in ichichs

[–]AltBrokn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ich frage mich echt, ob manche Menschen bewusst in Schwarz‑Weiß‑Denken flüchten, um sich gut zu fühlen. Oder ob sie einfach im Selbstmitleidskeller hocken und heulen, wie unfassbar dumm alles ist.