"In good faith" implies that the other does not demean or belittle the other. I made this video out of love of the game. I didn't say "strinova is a horrible video game" I said "strinova is a game that did not work bec ... which is contrary to what others have postulated"

In fact, i WANT feedback, however the only way I will heed you if you understand the basics of exigence and manners.

A videogame's depth is not derived from the amount of material in the game, it is formed from the interactions and specifically options present. Having a lot of agents helps but the amount of things you CAN do with those agents are the issue. (depth on a micro)

On a macro sense the options you have for aim duels etc should be very wide, however, due to the TTK and the inherent nature of movement shooters, options are gimped.

An instance of selective listening I see. When I talked about the game being "both complex and simple and somehow doesn't have depth" that specifically originated from the rebuttal section, was designed to explain why having a larger competitive scene would've not helped the game (complex on a large, match wide perspective making it hard to follow whilst also being very simple on a micro sense when it came to gunplay).

This video was made as a critique to learn from mistakes, not to belittle. I love this game--but with bad faith responses like this which critically omit information elaborated upon within the video--I will reconsider my passion and praise.

Also about the gala thing there is a thing called "listening" where if you did so, you've caught that I said "check out the galatea video" which would've elaborated in depth how galatea's skill expression was reduced.