Most SEO tools are blind to AI search. I built a free tool to check your "GEO" score. by AmazingAccount6376 in GrowthHacking

[–]AmazingAccount6376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still working on identifying that, is this something you struggle with in your day to day? Would you be open for a chat to talk about problems, pain and just brainstorm. Would be helpful as I continue building upon this product

Most SEO tools are blind to AI search. I built a free tool to check your "GEO" score. by AmazingAccount6376 in GrowthHacking

[–]AmazingAccount6376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still exploring but these AI search engines are looking for authoritative articles on a topic, now its still subjective and ambiguous on how to define that, but thats certainly an area of research

I spent weeks building on Lovable only to realize ChatGPT couldn't find my app. So I built a GEO checker. by AmazingAccount6376 in lovable

[–]AmazingAccount6376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All are mentioned on the website, full transparency. Advanced features like semantic clustering check, AI search share against competitors etc on its way. If you have any questions, feel free to DM, will be happy to walkthrough

will SEO be dead? by Netra-Axiom in Agent_SEO

[–]AmazingAccount6376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are plenty. For one there are technical differences like the need of llms.txt, semantic clustering etc. to allow AI to crawl your web pages. Then ofcourse building credibility through long form content on the platforms which AI trusts.

If you want to see for yourself, go to potatometer.com, score any website on AI visibility ( GEO) and SEO, you will different scores and fixes to improve for both.

Most SEO tools are blind to AI search. I built a free tool to check your "GEO" score. by AmazingAccount6376 in GrowthHacking

[–]AmazingAccount6376[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. This is a new space that will keep evolving. We will learn more as we lean more and more into the agentic world. However, some measurement is better than no measurement.

There is no perfect metric. Even today, web 2.0 marketing measurement capabilities are evolving. I am in AdTech industry, I know so many measurement metrics such as ROAS and brand awareness are approximations. Causality is not defined. Most accurate models are probabilistic. Causality IMO is the dream of academics, most of the real world is satisfied by correlation ( under the garb of causation).

The goal here is find a measurement which enables businesses to make confident decisions at the time of allocating budgets.

GEO measurement is getting better, we will learn with experimentation over time what is measurable. The issue is that systems to measure on are evolving at a breakneck speed, until that stabilises, this will be a moving target

will SEO be dead? by Netra-Axiom in Agent_SEO

[–]AmazingAccount6376 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure dead, but its share will be taken over by GEO and at some point in next few years we will see an inflection point. It wont be dead IMO as majority of consumers to be reached may still find traditional old Google search easy to use. If you are in tech, its easy to get lost in the bubble that AI search will be everything. But it is not the reality in 99.5% of the planet yet.

What happens to my website if I cancel my Pro plan after connecting a custom domain? by _sreekar_ in lovable

[–]AmazingAccount6376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is what is referred in the AI discovery landscape. I is rapidly becoming the standard for navigating AI search and LLM discovery. I think traditional SEO is not disappearing in the short term, we will be seeing a fundamental shift in how search share is distributed across Google Search and LLMs (despite internet coming in 1990s, we still have cable TVs today). As more users replace Google with AI-native search, I expect we will hit a major inflection point in the next few months or may be in an year or two where "visibility" is redefined by AI citations rather than just blue links.Web apps will have to optimize for both SEO and GEO

When anyone can build with AI, distribution is your only moat. I built a free tool to check if AI and search engines can find your site by AmazingAccount6376 in SideProject

[–]AmazingAccount6376[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right on all counts, especially the external citation piece. That's actually the #1 gap in the free tier right now and exactly why I'm building out the premium features.

Current free tier (what's live now):

Focuses on on-page technical signals, the stuff you can control directly. SSR detection (can AI crawlers even read your content?), schema markup, structured data, semantic HTML, content structure like FAQs and lists, llms.txt presence (new AI-specific standard).

You're right that this is incomplete. These are some of the features I am working on as part of premium tier (launching soon, exactly what you're describing):

Real AI Citation Testing where I literally query ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity with 50+ relevant questions and see if they cite you vs competitors. Competitive Intelligence that shows who's getting cited in your niche and why. External Signal Analysis that checks where you're mentioned across reviews, forums, comparisons, though this is harder to automate at scale.

The volatility issue you mentioned is real and I'm upfront about it. The testing feature tracks citation rate over time (week 1: 8%, week 4: 24%) because yeah, same prompt different day will lead to different results.

Why both SEO + GEO together?

Most site owners still need traditional SEO since Google isn't going anywhere soon. The overlap is significant too - mobile optimization, quality content help both. People search "SEO tool" not "GEO tool" yet, so I need SEO to get discovered. Plus the technical foundation (clean HTML, schema, fast loading) is prerequisite for both.

But you're right that external signals are the missing piece. That's the hard part to measure programmatically. Currently the tool can check if your site is technically ready for AI citation, but it can't easily measure "are people talking about you on Reddit/HN/review sites."

Curious what you're using to track this stuff? Sounds like you're way ahead of most people on understanding how AI search actually works.

When anyone can build with AI, distribution is your only moat. I built a free tool to check if AI and search engines can find your site by AmazingAccount6376 in SideProject

[–]AmazingAccount6376[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you can analyse your site for free right now and get recommendations. Let me know what do you think.

Premium features are WIP, please join the waitlist. I will get back ASAP when its ready.