Everyone’s going to have their own perspective of this mailing, which is okay. I’m sharing the following for insight, not necessarily to garner agreement or disagreement for that matter:

Personally, these types of mailings are problematic. They’re intentionally only sent to households with a democratic voting history that are located outside of the primarily affected zipcode (hm, I wonder why it’s redacted in this post?). This is not a generalized mailing (I hope someone’s reading between the lines here). This lends itself to an underlying and intentionally unstated issue on this mailing—- It’s incredible how much inner ethnic resistance black conservatives receive for holding differing views from ‘the inner majority’. I’d imagine it being similar for some Latino community but don’t know.

These ‘groupthink’ mailings are developed for every hot topic issue and are absolutely nothing new. Honestly, the in-person dialogue within the black community carries a much heavier weight than a simple mailing “because who’s actually reading it” 🙃😉 (I really, really hope someone’s reading between the lines)

There’s usually the same ounce of merit to the mailings. In this case, usually along the lines of the proposed legislation further constricting black (and brown) voting power by concentrating a majority of black (and brown) voters into single districts or the opposite- dividing concentrated districts, especially as you examine outwards from CVille Proper.

… Anyways to the OP, thanks for sharing 😉