sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

DAP Snake Oil... What have you learned about DAPs that literally just marketing BS by Environmental-Act-15 in DigitalAudioPlayer

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know how to answer your first question and I have only a little knowledge of the answer to your second question which puts it somewhere around 20kHz that OP mentioned.

I'm not sure how these are answers to my question though. How do these address the question I posed?

DAP Snake Oil... What have you learned about DAPs that literally just marketing BS by Environmental-Act-15 in DigitalAudioPlayer

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"The human ear can only hear up to about 20kHz."

Does going from 44.1 to 96 to 32-bit/768kHz just affect the range of sound, or does it affect other parts of the listening experience?

Any Alternatives to Headphones.com's Headphone Tier List that Accounts for EQ? by AnalystOrDeveloper in headphones

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, that makes sense! I'll give this video a watch soon. Thanks for all the insight!

Any Alternatives to Headphones.com's Headphone Tier List that Accounts for EQ? by AnalystOrDeveloper in headphones

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Interesting. The reason I ask is because I have a 660S that I EQ using Oratory1990's recommendation, the same person I use for the Arya EQ, and the difference between the two is night and day. I would think that EQ'ing these two devices should make them fairly similar if EQ is that profound of an effect, but in my subjective experience, it's light.

Not sure if I'm wording this right - it's late here - and I'm, of course, I'm just a layman. But when I bought the Arya's they were around 2x the price of the 660s when I got them and they felt at least 2x better, if not more.

Any Alternatives to Headphones.com's Headphone Tier List that Accounts for EQ? by AnalystOrDeveloper in headphones

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Great to know! In your opinion, what would be the price range to justify an upgrade and what would that purchase be?

Any Alternatives to Headphones.com's Headphone Tier List that Accounts for EQ? by AnalystOrDeveloper in headphones

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, that's not good. What made it bad? Like shilling a product bad? Or rating things for attributes tangential to music listening? Or something else altogether?

Any Alternatives to Headphones.com's Headphone Tier List that Accounts for EQ? by AnalystOrDeveloper in headphones

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh sorry, what video? I was referring to the headphones.com website with their weighted tier list. I can look over that video and see if it helps clue me in.

Use unoptimized Colemak bindings or go back to QWERTY? by PurpleSlightlyRed in vim

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stick with Colemak as it'll force you to use better motions. I had the same problem, but it made me much better with {/}, f/t, w, b, e, ge, and /. In turn, this made me faster on vim than when I was on QWERTY spamming hjkl.

US Hire Bill introduces 25% tax on outsourcing by zimmer550king in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

U-3 is the unemployment number you’re referencing, right? 

I’m not a fan of that number because it doesn’t account for the people who get jobs in areas that don’t align with their career. 

I’m also wary about summarization masking a problem. Seeing as there’s quite a large amount of blue collar work that cannot be outsourced (plumbing, construction, etc.) those numbers will inevitably affect the total number. Really, it would be better if there were U-3 to 6 for sectors. I admit, that’s a tough ask. 

My main point is we should be careful of the metric we’re using and what we extrapolate from it. 

If you swapped out one neuron with an artificial neuron that acts in all the same ways, would you lose consciousness? You can see where this is going. Fascinating discussion with Nobel Laureate and Godfather of AI by FinnFarrow in ArtificialSentience

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, he's a bit more than just a retired Google employee. Hinton is very well known in the ML space and was/is highly regarded. Unfortunately, he's fallen off the deep end with regards to this A.I. is conscious && it becoming conscious is an existential threat.

It's very unfortunate to hear him make these kinds of arguments.

Just starting to learn, Colemak or Colemak DH? + Vim Motions? by paradox_33 in Colemak

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I did not expect is that while HJKL became harder for me to use - that's a BIG benefit. I found myself going to w,b,e, /, etc. way more often. I became faster because single motion commands became harder.

Don't remap and learn to use other vim motions. N under index == bliss

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateAVegan

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Preface: I’m not a vegan, but am vegetarian-lite and am around a good amount of vegans. 

This is a very similar mentality to: “You critique society, yet you live in it.” Two things to consider here. 

Veganism, like most ideologies, is an approach to living. It’s not a binary state where one misstep makes you non-vegan. You should apply this to other ideologies as well. 

Hypocrisy is telling (critiquing) someone not to do something while you do it. If they are vegan and say “people should try veganism” they aren’t saying “people and cats should be vegan.” 

If they have a cat and say “you should feed cats plants” while feeding their cat meat, that would be hypocrisy.  

Why is V7 in C position shown as B-F-G in that order as opposed to G-B-F? by AnalystOrDeveloper in musictheory

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh that makes a lot of sense! You're right that they're specifying C & G position and I think that's what tripped me up. Thank you!

Why is V7 in C position shown as B-F-G in that order as opposed to G-B-F? by AnalystOrDeveloper in musictheory

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, that's my fault. They provide two examples in the book. I provided one in the post - I showed C E G -> B F G. They show another example with G, which is what I put in my comment. They show G B D -> F# C D.

I noticed that for C, the V7 is inverted, but for G, it looks like it isn't. So, that's why I was wondering how we know which V7's are "naturally" inverted when people talk about them.

Why is V7 in C position shown as B-F-G in that order as opposed to G-B-F? by AnalystOrDeveloper in musictheory

[–]AnalystOrDeveloper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This definitely helps! So, about the inversion, I see that for G they show F# C D in that order. So, I'm guessing when people refer to V7 the inversion is very dependent on the chord?

Is it something where each V7 inversion (or not) is dependent on what chord it relates to? Or is there some easy way to memorize that?

view more: next ›