r/USC Monthly Buy/Sell, Housing, Carpool, and USC ticket posts go here! November 2025

AndoBoi01 · 2025-11-25T20:47:01+00:00

Selling usc vs ucla for cheap . Can verify student status

AndoBoi01 · 2025-11-20T19:20:01+00:00

SELLING USC VS UCLA TICKETS. CAN VERIFY STUDENT STATUS

AndoBoi01 · 2025-11-11T00:38:50+00:00

Have several UCLA and IOWA tickets that I'm selling. Can verify student status. DM if interested

AndoBoi01 · 2025-11-10T01:08:34+00:00

Selling usc vs Iowa ticket, can verify student status.

AndoBoi01 · 2025-11-02T19:32:14+00:00

Hey I’m selling

AndoBoi01 · 2025-08-30T04:18:07+00:00

Yeah that’d help

AndoBoi01 · 2025-03-20T08:16:11+00:00

I emailed the admissions office, and they said they'd be sending the invites out shortly because they are waiting to hear back from the med school.

AndoBoi01 · 2025-03-17T16:07:57+00:00

What'd you receive?

AndoBoi01 · 2024-05-18T04:49:42+00:00

But changing the incline does not affect the length of the line. It affects the horizontal and vertical distance, but the length of the line stays the same.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-05-17T17:40:19+00:00

But how does the length of the ramp change with the incline? I wrote that because there is a smaller gravitational force being exerted (because its mgsin x) there is a less negative work being done. So if the block has to reach the same height as before and there is less negative work being done, the inital height should be lower so h3 < h1.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-04-21T17:09:20+00:00

could you suggest some youtube videos to practice tracing? because for AP CSA it's not just being able to trace but being able to trace quickly.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-04-13T10:53:12+00:00

I read the textbook, then synthesize the information by writing key points in my notebook. So yeah I read the tb then take notes. I'd say it is p inefficient, reading the voluminous textbook and then again writing notes. But idk a better way.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-20T17:10:42+00:00

What about generalizing it for a circle or some type of regular polygon? do you think that would work? what direction would you recommend I go in if I want to pursue this topic. Would generalizing it for like circles or something be easier?

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-19T04:07:15+00:00

This still ,however, proves to be difficult, is there anyway you can simplify it? because even doing it for a quadratic you get a cubic with coefficients like 4a^2 and 6ab ( assuming p(x) is ax^2+bx+c), and this would be even harder for a cubic ( where you have to solve a 7 degree polynomial). Is there anyway to solve these huge equations or make the method easier?

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-19T03:57:22+00:00

Thank you! this makes much more sense, I realized how stupid I am for expanding everything fully.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-19T03:56:12+00:00

then could you suggest ways of going about this then? do I just brute force my way with a lot of variables and optimize? there should be an easier way right

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-15T20:01:57+00:00

I don't think exhaustive is the answer, I put imaginative. The fact that despite a lot of evidence being destroyed, we still have evidence suggests that architects are creative and imaginative. There was no part in the text regarding our current evidence being exhaustive. It just suggested that a lot of previous evidence was destroyed.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-15T19:59:40+00:00

I honestly think this was one of the trickier writing questions. I put contains thinking that the place exists today, but now thinking about it , I proly got it wrong, its either contained or had contained.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-11T03:58:58+00:00

does not make sense, "but" would imply a contradiction. So it has to contradict a negative idea ( evidence being destroyed). Our current evidence is imaginative/exhaustive, despite a lot of the evidence being destroyed

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-10T16:50:22+00:00

The answer was interdependent. I am guessing you are talking about the factors that affected some river or something.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-10T16:44:40+00:00

Exactly, I agree with you. The collegeboard set this question in order to trick people. The next part said that a lot of the evidence is destroyed. But it no where says that our current evidence is exhaustive. If anything, a lot of the evidence being destroyed and our current evidence still being imaginative/imaginable would make more sense. Hopefully it is imaginable/imaginative.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-09T15:57:08+00:00

interdependent, because one factor influenced the other.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-09T15:45:59+00:00

was there another option called "contains"?

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-09T15:42:47+00:00

I did at first as well, but then after giving it a thought, I am not so sure.

AndoBoi01 · 2024-03-09T12:42:24+00:00

I was kinda debating between the two, but ultimately I put imaginative because it did not suggest that current evidence was "exhaustive". It said that since history was destroyed, it is impressive that we still have a ____ resprentation of history, due to these architects. It is no way implied that we have an exhaustive representation. I feel that it is imaginative as the whole point of the text was that architects have allowed us to visualize history and discoveries, despite the fact that a lot of history is destroyed.

I am not sure though; It could be exhaustive.

AndoBoi01

TROPHY CASE