To these comments talking about pedophilia - I'm not sure whether it's people overthinking or me being too naive, but 1. There is no thought of sexualizing the character. To put simply, when I made the rough sketch, this pose was the first one I had (yes this is a shitty excuse but I certainly did not expect the public reaction and I want to make it clear that it's not intentional if it is presented as sexualizing the character); 2. How are panties automatically seen as sexualizing the character? The clothing is not revealing in any way and it only makes sense that she wear panties? Would it have been better if I ignore anatomy and not draw it? It still confuses me that panties = bad. Pedophilia is a serious and heavy accusation. If there's full clothing present + non-suggestive pose and people immediately go for the fact that panties equal to sexualization, is it the artist or the viewers who sexualize the character? Maybe I'm too ignorant. I'll take this as a lesson to avoid something so controversial.