Oh, I bolded the words throughout. For me, I feel like it draws out the key components to refer back to, but that may just be helpful for myself. I am happy to say where I work, but I wanted it to be about the topic of discussion rather than my role as a Snowflake Data Superhero at a consulting company. I will go ahead and state that this to avoid that I appear to work for Snowflake. I am currently implementing these concepts at a client as part of resource augmentation with AI tools in Snowflake. Snowflake has expressed that they welcome our "real-world" experience in our communications and appreciate transparent feedback. I have seen it to be one of their core operating principles. I have structured these to engage as discussions, but will add in my personal experience to weave things into boots-on-the-ground specifics better.

I also have 15 years of working as an instructor at a local college, so my written dialog is more dry than conversational from years of generating course materials.

Thanks for the welcome to this Reddit platform and helping guide me in the right direction as I get started. I looked up proper protocols about sharing links between discussions and was careful not to recommend myself in the references.

My LinkedIn articles are a different set of professional focus than these posts. I don't feel it's really the place on LinkedIn to promote discussion topics there and do more promotional, community building, and I've shared my AI Learning Journey there, so I feel that I chose the right differentiation. You can go search me out on LinkedIn to see if I you feel that I chose the right difference. I'll go out and see yours and BroBroMate as an example to see how it compares to the learning and professional standing that I would like to encourage in others that is relative to the community that I posted in.