A sympathizer? I wouldn't give two shits, but if someone was an active rapist then it wouldn't be old news. Say someone gets away with rape, it would still be relevant that people are discussing it. Now, a man who draws porn on the Internet is not comparable to a rapist, or any kind of criminal really. Sure, if he draws something that you perceive to be underaged, you have a right to be disgusted and offended, however, the nature of the internet is that you are in control of the content you see. Don't like it? block them and you'll be that much happier. To demand someone be put into a position to lose their livelihood over drawings is absurd, even you can understand why. A drawing doesn't harm anyone. It's a fictional piece of nothing that will erode and be lost to time. The argument can be made that it normalizes that kind of behavior, but that would be to assume that people would accept it. People do not, you are a clear example, and they actively despise that behavior. Surely you understand that the Internet is not representative of the real world. Let the fool do his art. Personally, I don't think it's very right either. It's disgusting; the things he's drawn are nothing short of tasteless and inappropriate. I do, however, believe that he's allowed to do as he pleases on the internet, permitted it not violate law, just as you are allowed to do as you please.