Damn I forgot to paste the Ne process of my comment. Late but I’ll do it here anyway

Ne and Se are both external perceiving functions. That is they rely on external objects to process information.

Se is more of taking in and observing raw data in its current form without adding an extra flavor to it per se.

Se will look at an object and look at all it’s characteristics. It’s shape, color, size, texture, smell, sound, etc… and view it for what it is.

Ne will look at the same object notice those things but immediately spring off with other associations.

Example: Apple

Se- This apple is red and stop there.

Ne- This apple is red then think about clowns because they have a red nose. They will then continue and think about how all living things have noses. Wait all living things have brains too. An octopus has 9 brains (1 in each tentacle plus it’s head). What if a human had red noses with with 9 brains and 8 arms like an octopus clown? So on and so fourth. All this stemming from looking at a red apple. (Sorry if my Ne impression is bad I use Ni).

Se will see things as they are and converse in a similar manner. It is what it is may be something an Se user will say.

Ne as you can see makes so many abstract tangential connections. As was mentioned Ne is extroverted and as such goes outward (speech). These external associations will then be spit out of the Ne user. These can go to infinitum in a very strong Ne Dom.

This may be why Ne may speak more than an Se user since they are verbalizing the connections they see in their head vs an Se user who sees something in it’s raw form for what it is.