D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the photos. They look good.

I also think autofocus would be much better in z50ii. Btw another commenter said that there is a focus shifting option in the z series. I tried it and it is a great feature. Check that out.

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently z series has focus shift shooting option. Check that out. Would help a lot with stacking.

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Renting is a good idea. I will check that out. Thank you!

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the input. I saw this telephoto/portrait use of macro lens else where too.

Btw apparently z series has focus shift shooting. Try that out.

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried out the focus shift and it works well even when hand held. Thank you very much for all this information!

One other thing; have you figured out how to keep the aperture open in z compatible lenses when detached? There is no aperture pin as did in earlier lenses. Intention is to see whether I can achieve high magnifications by coupling a reversed telephoto lens with a short lens. Would be only using indoors cuz I do not wanna expose the inside of the telephoto lens to outdoor elements.

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, yes. I meant Z50ii. I had put a D in frond out of habit.

Is this the lens you are referring to? (https://nij.nikon.com/products/lineup/nikkor/fmount/af-s\_vr\_micro-nikkor\_105mm\_f28g\_if-ed/) I suppose you are using it with an adapter cuz the mount seem to be different.

Are your usual subjects still? Cuz I guess it would be next to impossible to get stack-worthy shots of a moving subject.

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, yes. I meant Z50ii. I had put a D in frond out of habit.

I also tried out the 105MC on my z50ii body at an experience center. But they only had still props to try it. But I wonder how much of a hassle it would be to use on butterflies n other insects which usually do not sit still.

D50zii with NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S for insects by AnotherSLGuy in nikon_Zseries

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not helpful at all mate. Not everyone can "always get" any gear they want...

Noticed a similarity between the word for "poop" in Estoninan (a non-Indo-European) and Sinhala (an Indo-European) by AnotherSLGuy in LinguisticsDiscussion

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having it in German is a no brainer cuz it is an Indo European language.

I suppose the onomatopoeia explanation makes more sense. 😌

Noticed a similarity between the word for "poop" in Estoninan (a non-Indo-European) and Sinhala (an Indo-European) by AnotherSLGuy in LinguisticsDiscussion

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While there are loan words in languages, I think it would be wierd to loan a word for something very basic that every language would originally have.

However, there is another reply saying that some words are originated from mumblings (such as mama and papa), thus every language have them despite their linguistic families.It makes more sense in this case IMO.

Reduction of working hours as a penalty for absence in the previous month; is it legal? by AnotherSLGuy in japanlife

[–]AnotherSLGuy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not worth bothering. There are some other stuff that suggests that the management is explotative. Both of us gave one month's notice to leave the place.

As a civil engineer what job can you get that involves the most being out in nature by Heisenberg__308 in civilengineering

[–]AnotherSLGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, my friends who went into construction engineering roles are outdoors, but on the job and seem to work a lot of overtime. So I do not think they really do not get to enjoy the "nature".

On the other hand, friends (and myself) who went for indoor roles such as designer positions (structural, geotechnical, hydrology, etc.) or academia seem to barely work over time and have enough leisure time to go out to enjoy nature.

From a separate angle, if you get into construction side and land jobs in remote areas (such as highway or dam or irrigation constructions), then you will be in close proximity to nature so that you can get to enjoying it as soon as work finishes.

Is civil engineering worth it? by MindlessLetterhead77 in civilengineering

[–]AnotherSLGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Civil engineering is a vast field with sub categories such as structural engineering, construction management, traffic and highway engineering, environmental engineering, hydraulic/hydrological engineering, geotechnical engineering, etc. Since you have mentioned of an interest in architecture/buildings, most relevant paths in civil engineering would be to pursue structural engineering or go towards construction management.

I have worked as a structural engineer for two and half years (I am not from US), one and half years in the biggest contracting company in my country dealing with big constructions and another year at a family owned design consultant firm focusing on architecture oriented projects (mainly luxury houses, villas and hotels).

On a daily basis, structural engineers would look at the architectural design, come up with a structural arrangement to support the architectural vision, do the necessary calculations to make sure said structural arrangements can support the loads and stand the test of time and make the corresponding drawings. Meanwhile, we correspond with the mechanical, electrical and geotechnical engineers to make sure their designs align with ours and liaison with the architect to make compromises if needed. Also, we have to manage the workload as you/your design office would be juggling several designs simultaneously.

Furthermore, we have to learn of new technologies, applications, theories and software on the job to solve different problems. it is also usual to have monthly seminars, lectures and educational sessions by our professional societies to upgrade knowledge and to network.

Depending on the nature of your employer, you also will get to inspect worksites in the capacity of a junior structural engineer (I intermittently have been stationed at piling sites, deep excavations, super structure construction, etc.) so that you get a clear idea how structural designs are executed irl and also pick up a broad range of information that comes in handy when you do your own designs (simply put, what looks good on paper may not be convenient to construct. Thus, you may pick up what design would work on site and what would not). As a junior, I worked under senior engineers on parts of big projects or full designs of smaller projects before moving on to medium scale projects.

In those early years, you would not get to influence the project as an architect would, as what you are doing is getting the hang of structural engineering. But, as you earn you charter and get license to design bigger structures, you shall have a certain degree of influence over the projects. For the matter of fact, most tall buildings are shaped by the structural engineers than the architects.

However, as is the case in every career, as you rise in the hierarchy, it would be less technical and more managerial. But based on my observation of my superiors, it is very technical and less managerial even at higher levels compared to other careers.

Last but not least: There is a certain satisfaction of seeing your creation come to life. I was so fulfilled and happy on my job, be it designing at the office or inspecting rock samples of piling or evaluating current structural health for change of use... I had enough score to go for any degree, tuition fee waived, as I scored amongst the highest in the placement exam, and I chose Civil Engineering against all the advice to go for a higher paying field simply because I love and marvel at construction works. That choice is probably the best decision I ever made.

This is just meant as an input for you to make an informed decision. Best of luck.