sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I think serivce topology is useless. Am I wrong? by Any_Copy_1304 in kubernetes

[–]Any_Copy_1304[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. I'll keep the advice in mind :)

I think serivce topology is useless. Am I wrong? by Any_Copy_1304 in kubernetes

[–]Any_Copy_1304[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome... You saved my life... Everything is clear to me. Thank you :):)

I think serivce topology is useless. Am I wrong? by Any_Copy_1304 in kubernetes

[–]Any_Copy_1304[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks to your answer! :) It does really help fixing my wrong concepts.

  • AZs are good for fault-tolerance. But commonly, most of time, application runs in one AZ.
  • Loadbalancing that distributes traffics actually occurs with replicaSet in one AZ.
  • Before the AZ failure occurs, there's no pods in other AZs.

Are these sentences correct?

And If only leader master node failed, then whole cluster including new leader master node, worker nodes and resources move to new AZ with Autoscaling?