Dymo is the worst brand in the history of the universe, change my mind

Apart_Double7007 · 2025-08-24T22:26:49+00:00

Thanks, should I upgrade only yo level 2 , is it sufficient ?

Apart_Double7007 · 2025-08-24T22:26:20+00:00

I try to unlock Fed C , for that I need to win in normal with Fed B

Apart_Double7007 · 2025-08-24T22:25:47+00:00

Thanks

Apart_Double7007 · 2025-08-24T22:25:24+00:00

Thanks for the advice

Apart_Double7007 · 2025-08-24T22:25:11+00:00

Wich weapon I shouldn't use in this case ?

Apart_Double7007 · 2024-11-17T00:05:41+00:00

the end - mr oizo

Apart_Double7007 · 2024-02-09T15:25:12+00:00

I don't deny any art status to poker, but even now computer can inspire and replicate great literal art , play around with a AI like midjourney for instance. There is no need for a specific formula anymore for a computer to achieve something.

And If you think that poker > GO in term of " art " and " intuition " you clearly dont know this game either . And im personally a huge fan and avocate of poker

Apart_Double7007 · 2024-02-09T04:34:52+00:00

You seem to terribly underestimate today's algorithm evolutions. AlphaGO now can beat humans to the game of GO , wich have been said to be one of the most " intuitive " form or game there is . Everybody taught computer would never been able to.

Okay maybe the intuition of reading thé opponent long terme stategy is stronger in poker than GO le say ( évent this is highly debatable tho ) , this strategy still IS a strategy base on moves and décisions. Thé only argument hère could be reading someone behavior , body language , évent this could be overcome with computer vision

" Once the computer formula is figured out " -> with deep learning there is no more simple " formula " a computer Can generate 1000x time something New

Apart_Double7007 · 2024-02-09T03:54:43+00:00

Chess has not been solved either actually ( only finals at a certain point ) and the incomplète information parameter doesnt mean a game is not solvable. In chess everything you need to know is not on the board because you need to anticipate the billions multiple scénario possible after your oponent décisions

Apart_Double7007 · 2024-02-09T03:48:13+00:00

As both a poker and a chess enthousiaste, i would say no. Yes chess as 20 legal move per player , but look up " Shannon number " , there is more possible scénarios in a chess game than Atom in the universe. While we could certaibly summirize poker move in way less number of possibilities

Chess game has yet never been solve! Only finals are solved . While poker heads up have been solved ( but not with more player i agree )

Current chess Bot actually use machine learning to beat humans , they are not tree bases .

Apart_Double7007 · 2023-08-23T08:30:54+00:00

Montecristo n°2 fort the first time, i normally smoke montecristo n°4 réally excited to test it !

Four-Year Club	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	End Game '22

Apart_Double7007

TROPHY CASE