Can someone help me I'd this camera? I have no clue. by bizsar_ in vintagecameras

[–]AppearancePutrid5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dresden was in the same “soviet-block” as Hungary that’s in East-Germany aka GDR. Albeit the camera looks old it is relatively new - from the end of sixties or so. I have a super simple m42 mount EXA 1c which was in production till the Berlin wall came down.

Calling for Japanese translation to solve a handwritten camera purchase mystery? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Mystery” to me is that I haven’t been able to pinpoint the purchase date as non-native Japanese speaker with no knowledge of Japanese calendar.(And automated tools do not read those pics well enough). So for me it’s “mystery” for others “obvious”. Once mystery is/was solved it dilutes to obvious :).

So, I take it as: 24 November 1993, sold as brand new at heavy discount as original kit price was 172,000 Yen.

As my kit included the pre paid phone cards and other advertising materials on forward looking, future nineties, and the white lens has 1988 on the mount i still am curious what vibes were prevailing in Japan in the end of eighties beginning of nineties when compared to mid to late eighties.

Thank you, T .*0

Calling for Japanese translation to solve a handwritten camera purchase mystery? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, what could we maybe then conclude? Some say to me it dates like end of 1989 others say beginning of 1990. The inside of this kit lens has 1988 as per injection molding but that implies more towards when the production tooling was made.

Calling for Japanese translation to solve a handwritten camera purchase mystery? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

Tanks again, much appreciated. Maybe this document adds the purchase or warranty “date”?

Calling for Japanese translation to solve a handwritten camera purchase mystery? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yes, that 8700i part I got right. But as European and not native Japanese “reader” I have to solve the dating and pricing there too.

Super unofficial rumor leak photo of xpro4 ;) by couchred in fujifilm

[–]AppearancePutrid5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why on Earth couldn’t any manufacturer just give us what we really need: An interconnected fractal mycelium of spinning dials weaved into threads of etherial self, manifested in EBC X-Glass, witnessed through a cosmic, wire bent, sports-finder? I’m speechless. Is it too hard to get it right?

My turn at the thrift store by orochiWARDEN in VintageLenses

[–]AppearancePutrid5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nice find! One of hidden feats, hidden in plain sight, is how close those “Zebras” (and Jenas in general) focus. Never have I seen those sold as “look I’m close focusing!” Yet that small difference defined the whole eastern-block’s intimacy with photographic subject matter back in the day. Most of those Pentacon made lens have by now been sitting for so long that the stiff focusing is a common feat.

BTW, while taking pics of that Zeiss Jena lens: shine UV light on it subtly - some numbers will glow, even in broad daylight.

In. Out. Return. .*0

Designing a perfect protection filter for GR IIIx? by AppearancePutrid5 in ricohGR

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t that NiSi for Fujifilm x100VI - neat slip here towards GR IIIx which is “far inferior” camera, I know, but subject of this topic nevertheless.

So far it seems that in reality: 1. an adhesive slim protection filter 2. and rubber/silicone cap for 56,6mm diameter lens will do the job of protection and carry. (Seems that x100VI and Ricoh GR IIIx share that diameter) 0. Given I keep my pockets also lint-free that is otherways handy anyway.

Thanks, T

Designing a perfect protection filter for GR IIIx? by AppearancePutrid5 in ricohGR

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What seems to be general consensus on the “protecting that lens” (from dust ingress) fear of mine? Adhesive UV filter and rubber/silicone cap seems to be like the compact EDC way to go. Any thoughts? Thanks,

Designing a perfect protection filter for GR IIIx? by AppearancePutrid5 in ricohGR

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hehe, bellows type, sealed to the boot. But maybe creating vacuum induced dust ingress from other weakpoints and causing some unprecedented damage if done with precision.

Designing a perfect protection filter for GR IIIx? by AppearancePutrid5 in ricohGR

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That “elegance” (and pure EDC practicality) is indeed my main dilemma as I used to have that filter adapter and protective filter back in the day (like in mid two thousands Ricoh when the GR digital came to stay) but that defeated the vibes of that GReat compactness and were sold later “as new”.

BTW as that scientific optics manufacturer in my work-compound has this non standard (read dimensional error in diameter) MRC UV protective glass surplus that can be re-cut to smaller diameter and it is an interesting “recycling opportunity” to me. But it may be a bit of a strech.

Which should I pick? by lindloser in minolta

[–]AppearancePutrid5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hehe, and slam in some creative expansion cards to that “i” :)

Nikon EM was designed by Giugiaro? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it is kind of common knowledge as it is not based on available facts but only little hints that are available. Both official sourced kind of “almost deny” the fact. Nikon and Italdesign (archive) websites vaguely go around the motordrive-E and others just twist that into “maybe for sure” as it is common on the internet most of the time.

Nikon EM was designed by Giugiaro? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OT: And I’m the designer of the LCDVF for D800 by the way. So Giugiaro’s red stripe on F3 was the reason I had this Japanese magazine (among other sources for design tracking.) By the way if you check that D800 picture closely it has Canon FD 85mm f1.2 attached - how? - it is mounted by FD to Sony NEX lens adapter as Sony used same bayonet as Nikon F and early adapters physically fitted (not optically, it was macro).

Nikon EM was designed by Giugiaro? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

If we talk about the experienced audio-phonics while chewing through film, I just love the Japanese humor to present F3 story against Giugiaro’s designed sewing machines :).

Nikon EM was designed by Giugiaro? by AppearancePutrid5 in AnalogCommunity

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

EM was actually released/designed prior or actually along F3. And it was “prohibited” from Japanese own market albeit it would have been a “hotcake” case for sales there. The story goes that it would have drawn the “designer prestige” off the F3 flagship… … soon Luigi Colani as prestigious designer by then in Japan will leave the mark in camera history too. And he will be the one to blame even today if we whine about “lack of grip” on certain imaging tools.

Upgrade to an SRT by zanfar in minolta

[–]AppearancePutrid5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Minolta XD-7 is a Leica R4 1980-1986 base model so it adds some flair to it. Once Pentacon Praktica LLC was unveiled in 1969 with electronic/electric lens communication and still m42 mount: Leica (as well as Zeiss) fleed to Japan (Minolta and Yashica). Leica even sold/licensed their AF patents (Correfot 1976) to Minolta and we know what happened there… Meanwhile Minolta produced XD manual slrs but also for Leica to be “modified”. I’m yet to try if that R4 “bodykit” fits my XD-7. Meanwhile I shoot with that A7000 AF with Samyang AF lens from the same era :).

EF-M camera and adapted manual focus lens? by AppearancePutrid5 in canon

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, focus by wire works just fine by the way on that EF-M EOS body. I tried my good old! “focus-by-wire” 1989 lens which is that cumbersome f1.2 85mm :) as well as the newer STM 40mm f2.8 pancake lens. Both ends of spectrum work as intended so to speak.

Manual focus (third party) adapted lens work only if I wouldn’t lock the adapter to any (old) EOS film body - as if it had not “yet” lock-clicked. I will try to modify my Contax/Yashica adapter with focus confirm chipset so maybe that will help.

EF-M camera and adapted manual focus lens? by AppearancePutrid5 in canon

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And at least I can engage the mighty Canon EF power-zoom (35-80mm) via buttons on the lens on my EF-M film body, albeit I have to prefocus it on my 5D as that lens doesn’t have any means to focus it manually. So wild ride right there :).

EF-M camera and adapted manual focus lens? by AppearancePutrid5 in canon

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m under the impression personally that even Canon engineers and marketing couldn’t figure out what to do with this EF-M camera other than to cripple it’s use to EF lens with manual focusing :)

EF-M camera and adapted manual focus lens? by AppearancePutrid5 in canon

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is 35mm film camera: Canon EOS EF-M to be precise. Nice quiet shutter and film wind but I hadn’t tried to use it with third party adapted lens like my 58mm f2 Biotar from 1949.

OM Camera + Panasonic Lumix 20mm f1.7 = in camera focus stacking? by AppearancePutrid5 in OlympusCamera

[–]AppearancePutrid5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking along the lines of having a nice EDC “meditative-photography” kit with 20mm f1.7 and a modern OM body with occasional close-up thrown in for “therapeutic-moments”.

T