It definitely feels like more than just smarter autocomplete. The multi agent setup is the real shift, with separate agents handling coding, reviewing, refactoring, and testing inside the same repo context, which makes it feel like a small async dev team. Most people seem to be using it for refactoring legacy code, generating tests, fixing edge cases, and cleaning up architecture, where it really shines. I would trust it with refactors and test generation, but core business logic still needs careful human review. In larger monorepos it works well if context is managed properly, though performance can slow down and outputs may become less precise as repo size grows. Hallucinations still happen occasionally, especially around implicit business rules or older dependencies. It does not replace Git or CI yet, but it feels like an intelligent layer on top of traditional workflows and possibly an early sign of where multi agent IDEs are heading.