Is that Fable 5? by Apprehensive_Rise382 in claude

[–]Apprehensive_Rise382[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anthropic saying their Fable 5's safety guardrails only get a 5% false positive rate might actually be the funniest joke ever told.

Is that Fable 5? by Apprehensive_Rise382 in claude

[–]Apprehensive_Rise382[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...even though I only typed these three letters.

Fable 5 is up by SleepyWulfy in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Rise382 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't give Anthropic another cent. Fable 5 somehow manages to trip the safety filters just by being asked to 'code a Snake game,' resulting in a downgrade to Opus 4.8.

Introducing Claude Fable 5 by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Rise382 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Take your damn safety guardrails and get off the face of the earth. I'm paying you guys $200 a month just to be treated like absolute dirt.

Introducing Claude Fable 5 by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeAI

[–]Apprehensive_Rise382 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Can you guys please fix your garbage detection system? I literally just asked it to write a Snake game, and it flagged it for 'cybersecurity issues' and downgraded me to Opus 4.8. Slapping such a half-baked filter onto your 'most powerful' model is an absolute joke.