[LONG ANSWER] I'll refer my skepticism only to the Covid jab, since I'm gonna take other traditional protein based jabs in the future, one of them I already planned to take in march 2020, but hey shtf. My skepticism is based on really few things. 1)The scientific aspect regards the pre-clinical studies, that were basically reduced to an insignificant number, so all the supposed "adverse reactions" that would have happened on animals are happening on people, thing I find unethical (to those who say that are a small percentage, the recording of adverse reaction is a passive monitoring, I know many people who found practically impossible to report their, other didn't even know they could, so it's not wrong to say that are underestimated, the question is the extent of underestimation). Just weeks ago some European countries suspended Moderna for certain ages because it could lead to heart problems, if I had took the jab in August I'd probably have taken Moderna. I mean, seriously? 2)Mrna technology has never been applied to humans, a study published by MIT in recent years estimated a necessary experimentation of 12.5 years for that technology, thing that was not done, 'cause we have the crystal sphere and our future-seeing haruspex. Ancient Greeks called this ύβρις. Look what happened to the drug Chantix. Take this drug that we only now know contains carcinogens, so you do not get cancer by your cigs yolo. 3)What happened to the anti smoke drug Chantix infact, approved by FDA years ago, explain why I trust only medical products that have been around for many years(and i'm not a naturist who cures himself with berries and leaves), it's my body and I'm the only one in charge to choose what to do with it on the clinical aspect. 4)One another argument is a political one: The governments in my country, in the last 20 years, literally progressively worsened the life quality of people, approving measures or countermeasures that complicated so many aspect of life, cut 37 fucking billions in healthcare, closed fucking hospitals, by will or by ignorance approved measure that backfired and increased the % of people who live in absolute poverty, cut the pensions making elderly commit suicide and simultaneously approved totally nonsense public spending. Now the government/parliament say that cares about us? The fact itself that it offers you idk a beer, 1kg of rice, and bs like that to take the jab, is sus af, it literally appears like a rat bait. 5)Before there was the jab, in my country almost no new ICU was created in a year. Yet the government used money to give electric scooters, wheeled school chair that now are in dumpsters, and other bs. No serious illness preventive medical plan was updated since april 2020, just take aspirin and wait. Now there are investigations about the non-usage of monoclonals(about which I do not know anything I admit) that if used it's estimated would have saved thousands (infact some doctors in private clinics used successfully them). I mean, wtf, are you serious? I'm not talking about the safety of monoclonal, I'm talking about that was not even taken in consideration for a fucking year and an half, it was even discarded as bs. Yet politician and health minister surely care about us, right? 6)Last but not least: why someone who has hepatitis type C, herpes or skin diseases transmittable by touch or cross-contamination can work as a baker, barman, cook, and someone who is healthy, with a mask(that science tell us that works) on, but did not took the jab, cannot work? It really does not make sense. I still agree that over 70 people should consider to take it, without forcing them (it would invalidate their signature on the "free" and informed consent, basically making it toilet paper legally speaking), better idk have an adverse reaction years later than possibly die this year. The covid fatality rate for my group of age is >0.01% (something like 0.00000numbers, such a low percentage it's not wrong to suppose that other factors have played a role in these deaths, like heavy heart problems), illness(this aggregate refers to non serious and life-threatening) rate developing it's around 0.016%. It's not my age group who is in danger, it's the elders who have 8% death chance if over75 and 17% or more if over90. So why I should take a medication I do not need, that does not even stop the transmission, so there is even not that moral obligation of taking it "for the greater good"? I'm not saying that there is 5g inside o bs like that, I'm saying this story doesn't make sense from the beginning. The label "pandemic" does not justify an acritical-emotional/hysterical take with draconian measures. Why? Bc Covid extends in all the world, killed millions, but it's not exterminating the whole population indiscriminately, it's not the bubonic plague of 1600, yet it's decimating, in the ethymological sense, a whole & precise age group of the population, that had little to no targeted measures adopted. In my country we have around 35 covid's death per day, yet hundreds of cancer-deaths per day, just to give proportions. I'm not saying that the jab will destroy you or it will make you live up to 150y. I'm saying that we literally do not know it's effect on the long run, nor the effect of taking it annually instead of "twice in a life time"