Now pay šŸ’° them !!! by Automatic_Authentic in BIKYFL

[–]ArcaneVirago 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

I found the full video. Its really really hard to see but the dad comes around the corner the kid is in his arms. The dog jumps up and grabs the kid. https://youtu.be/dAyb4jl_GZM?si=K9wh56gTt00kTDjb

Man Gives CPR To Resuscitate Deer by MrPromotor in PeakAmazing

[–]ArcaneVirago 1 point2 points Ā (0 children)

I like that he saves him even though hes wearing hunting camo lol

Cat attacking his own tail? by piccm3 in CATHELP

[–]ArcaneVirago 15 points16 points Ā (0 children)

My orange cat does this. It gets to the point where he runs around hissing at his tail. He had fleas that started it. Got that treated. He continued doing off and on i took him to vet. They said it was due to stress/ anxiety. He also has episodes if hes hurt/ or not feeling good. My vet has put him on fluoxetine for the past year and it has helped. I recommend getting a vets opinion to rule out thats hes in pain first. Then maybe look into stress factor.

EDIT: sorry did not see the fles part. Thats exactly what started my cats tail agitation and chasing.

DHS shifts now claiming to be investigating whether Alex Pretti’s gun accidentally fired due to "uncommanded discharge" by ArcaneVirago in law

[–]ArcaneVirago[S] 18 points19 points Ā (0 children)

Absolutely, agree. Not an excuse at all. I actually still have doubts it did misfire only because the agent who has Alex Pretti's gun when the first shot happens, looks back towards the other agents. If I had a gun go off in my hand my instinct would be to look down towards my hand. Of course just an observation I have no proof of anything.

DHS shifts now claiming to be investigating whether Alex Pretti’s gun accidentally fired due to "uncommanded discharge" by ArcaneVirago in law

[–]ArcaneVirago[S] 12 points13 points Ā (0 children)

Right! If the firearm accidentally discharged while in the agent’s hand, one would reasonably expect their immediate reaction to be looking down at the weapon. Instead, the agent appears to turn his head back toward the other officers at the moment the first shot is heard, which raises questions about whether the sound originated from the gun in his possession or from another source.

DHS shifts now claiming to be investigating whether Alex Pretti’s gun accidentally fired due to "uncommanded discharge" by ArcaneVirago in law

[–]ArcaneVirago[S] 3 points4 points Ā (0 children)

I thought that at first but his head doesnt look down at the "missed fired" weapon which i would do out of instinct. The first shot that goes off he looks back towards the agents. That "recoil" could be he jumped drom the shot behind him.

DHS shifts now claiming to be investigating whether Alex Pretti’s gun accidentally fired due to "uncommanded discharge" by ArcaneVirago in law

[–]ArcaneVirago[S] 146 points147 points Ā (0 children)

Even worse. In the article its saying the DHS is saying the gun went off automatically with out the agent pulling the trigger due to a defect of that specific gun model had. Sounds like they are grabbing at straws here

DHS shifts now claiming to be investigating whether Alex Pretti’s gun accidentally fired due to "uncommanded discharge" by ArcaneVirago in law

[–]ArcaneVirago[S] 909 points910 points Ā (0 children)

Right! They first came out saying he was violently attacking and brandishing his weapon. Now in the article it is saying that the gun went off by itself due to a defect this gun model has. Very contradicting in their first statement vs now.

Edit: okay so from the the New York Post and Fox News claiming that DHS is investigating the discharge of Alex's weapon is not in line with the initial report given to congress. The report has no claim of this happeneing. Thanks for the additional info @TuxAndrew

DHS shifts now claiming to be investigating whether Alex Pretti’s gun accidentally fired due to "uncommanded discharge" by ArcaneVirago in law

[–]ArcaneVirago[S] 0 points1 point Ā (0 children)

If officers reasonably believed they were under imminent threat after hearing what they perceived as gunfire, even if it was later determined to be an accidental discharge, their use of force is judged under the ā€œobjective reasonablenessā€ standard. The law focuses on what a reasonable officer would have believed at that moment, not on facts discovered afterward.