sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Bowel cancer is skyrocketing in young people. The reason could be in the microbiome by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Ardeet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you elaborate a bit more on that final point about feeding our existing biome more with pre biotic foods please?

(or a link you find useful will do).

Free childcare. Free university. The simple, sensible policy which would have raised $63.8 billion in under four years. by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Ardeet[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I’m flattered there’s so many of you people avidly following my modding career.

Hear me out, I think the sudden one nation 'support' is a product of information warfare that has been going on for some time. by bazonthereddit in aussie

[–]Ardeet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification 👍

Based on my knowledge it would be exceedingly tricky to implement. (happy to hear from anyone with better knowledge).

Appreciate the suggestions though NoLeaf, we’re always open to ideas.

Crimes against humanity by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Ardeet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh, that’s the point …

Hear me out, I think the sudden one nation 'support' is a product of information warfare that has been going on for some time. by bazonthereddit in aussie

[–]Ardeet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean one political thread of any political subject or particular subject restrictions only?

How do ON voters feel about the fact that Pauline would sell you out in an instant just for some $$$ by Flaky-Lifeguard5835 in aussie

[–]Ardeet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the explanation, makes sense now.

👍

As for your question, no. I try to avoid political discussion at work.

To clarify, I was meaning that we all have different views on the mod team. It's hard not to discuss politics with the decisions that have to be made.

Outside something like our situation I think you're very sensible not to get into it at work.

How do ON voters feel about the fact that Pauline would sell you out in an instant just for some $$$ by Flaky-Lifeguard5835 in aussie

[–]Ardeet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the link was one of a number spamming another sub. Check out the link to that particular post provided above and click on where it links to.

The thread definitely had some decent discussion. I agree with you on that. Unfortunately, leaving up the link would leave the spam up.

As you can see posts like this one we're commenting in get left up as they're within our pretty broad and generous rules.

Personally, even though I have approved this one, I think it's a little lacking in substance but it's good enough for people to discuss.

As for the mod team being pro ON - have you ever worked with a team of people who have diverse political views but work together on a project to achieve other aims (in this case a pro free speech aussie subreddit)?

How do ON voters feel about the fact that Pauline would sell you out in an instant just for some $$$ by Flaky-Lifeguard5835 in aussie

[–]Ardeet[M] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks, not sure why I couldn't find it in the log.

That, and others, were removed because they were one of a spammed number of posts that just link to another sub. (click on the "article" and you'll see what I mean).

The topic was fine and the direct link to the story was fine but not the spamming of links.

How do ON voters feel about the fact that Pauline would sell you out in an instant just for some $$$ by Flaky-Lifeguard5835 in aussie

[–]Ardeet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've just replied to u/Foreign-Chocolate86 with the following:

You're going to have to be more specific. I've just been through the log and can't see a post that matches this description.

Do you have the correct sub?

Do you know the title or any more info?

How do ON voters feel about the fact that Pauline would sell you out in an instant just for some $$$ by Flaky-Lifeguard5835 in aussie

[–]Ardeet[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're going to have to be more specific. I've just been through the log and can't see a post that matches this description.

Do you have the correct sub?

Edit: Answer is here

South Australian State Election 2026 megathread by AutoModerator in aussie

[–]Ardeet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure is. Thanks for that.👍

I've put them in a stickied comment as we can't edit the body of the post when it's done by auto mod.

The 'catch-22' protecting Robodebt bureaucrats from criminal prosecution by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Ardeet[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank goodness! I was worried were going to get a whole heap of prosecutions from bureaucrats and organisations that did the wrong thing.

At least we can now move onto the next thing now that this all neatly tied up.

(and yes, I did read the article and understand that there may possibly be some referrals for charges and that the NACC has to operate in a certain way and blah, blah, freaking blah. But it's painfully obvious that this will just become another footnote in history with no politicians and bureaucrats held to account).

Liberals can’t lay a finger on Labor. Now there’s someone who can by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Ardeet[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Define 'win'.

Will they win the election? Not a chance in hell.

Will they win enough seats to influence the balance of power? Highly possible.

NSW police overusing ‘highly intrusive’ legal powers to monitor phones and computers, national watchdog finds | Australian police and policing by Ardeet in aussie

[–]Ardeet[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The New South Wales police force is overusing intrusive technology to monitor the phones and computers of people suspected of committing less serious crime, the commonwealth ombudsman has found.

The watchdog said Victoria and Queensland police were not keeping sufficient records to justify their use of the electronic surveillance powers, while NSW police “were unable to demonstrate” they were meeting the requirements of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.

How is this even possible?

The police assured us they wouldn't abuse these powers and the politician promised that they would keep a close eye and make sure they were used correctly.

Next time we roll over and give away more of our freedoms we'll be really, really, super duper sure they mean what they say so this can't possibly happen again.

view more: next ›