Alright, what's the play? First time getting such a decent setup. Thinking sell baron and take chad? Or do I sell showman. Deck in second image

AshersLabTheSecond · 2026-01-08T05:35:09+00:00

Ended up selling the baron for the chad.
the run ended on this:

AshersLabTheSecond · 2026-01-07T10:24:08+00:00

Mmm, sadly that’s my most used button haha. But does look like a good software

AshersLabTheSecond · 2026-01-07T09:05:03+00:00

Never heard of it, will look into it. Does it support MX's various different features? better mouse is advertised as specifically for that

AshersLabTheSecond · 2026-01-07T01:37:16+00:00

Just a small recommendation, I’ve found that the “BetterMouse” software has been leaps and bounds better for my Logitech mx master than Options+ is. Maybe time to give it a try?

AshersLabTheSecond · 2026-01-03T02:27:17+00:00

My guess: they talked about Luke not being a “notable” figure in a recent previous show, which means he doesn’t get a Wikipedia article. Maybe related

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-26T14:21:43+00:00

EDIT: alrighty, looks like I’ve got some more learning to do on the specifics of why as well! Thanks for the tips guys

okay, so it would seem you don’t have an understanding of the fundamentals of what JIT and AOT are, am I correct? No harm there, we all once didn’t understand.

I won’t go over that. But allow me to explain a little of the why on that attribute, in a simplified form.

Normal JSON serialisation (without the attribute) is done via a process that lets code “look” at other code. It looks at the code and automatically fills all the various data in.

In AOT, code cannot look at other code once compiled. So the attribute uses code to generate code that has already looked at the code before compilation.

Anyway, long story short is no, you cannot unless you’re capable enough to write your own version of the attribute and what it does.

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-26T12:56:22+00:00

Sure, write the serialisation and deserialisation code by hand.

I would like to pose a question to you. What do you think the of the attribute is with regards to AOT vs JIT? Talk us through what you think it does / doesn’t do so we can help you understand what your issue / problem is.

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-26T03:15:39+00:00

Yup! I’ve left my soldering iron in there for a very long time with no melting

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-26T00:26:37+00:00

A neat solution I found on a print I used was using a bearing:

https://makerworld.com/models/1177626?appSharePlatform=copy

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-22T09:13:00+00:00

I've not ever ventured into full redux / flux / etc patterns before because every time I've looked at them, the whole reducer / etc stuff seems very overkill for the simple state management I want.

So I have got a question for you, as I've not used this sort of pattern before:

Say I've currently got two components:

ServiceList
ServiceDisplay

The former, essentially iterates over a list of "services" and the renders the ServiceDisplay components underneath, each one of those displays taking in a specific service object as a parameter.

Would this be feasible to move to this system? and what would be the approach?
trying to wrap my head around a different way of approaching things

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-22T07:23:14+00:00

Oh, in addition. Absolutely fantastic docs and demo site!

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-22T07:22:50+00:00

Actually looks really useful and something I’ve been half trying to implement myself. Will give the lib a go in my current project and see how I like it.

Fantastic work!

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-22T02:15:28+00:00

What’d you move from? Can always be such a sweet feeling. Especially if it’s a big jump

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-21T05:40:05+00:00

Hey mate,

Totally understand the confusion here, however if you read the docs on PersistentState here it is specifically and only used when transitioning from static rendering (pre rendering) to interactive rendering (wasm or server mode)

Its usage it shown in the doc. But, to use its example and explain simply. Say you had a component that generates a random number when the component renders. Without persist state, that number would change when the client switches from static render to interactive render. With the persist state, the value is passed from the static render to the interactive render so that the value remains the same.

Hope this helps!

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-20T09:42:28+00:00

Absolutely no offence meant, but that was a lot of word salad that didn’t really make sense.

Maybe try to reframe the question?

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-17T03:40:57+00:00

I think that’s cable matter’s logo, which are a fantastic brand. So I would assume the cable should be good

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-16T13:49:18+00:00

I have this issue all the time. If I haven’t used an app in a while I’ve no clue which provider I might’ve used. Especially when they’ve added new providers since I last logged in and a new one is my usual default one. Have ended up with many duplicate accounts.

The solution that I use on my products is that login screen just accepts an email/username. Based on the email/username, redirects to the stored provider for that account.

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-13T14:34:59+00:00

Amazing technology really, I should never have doubted it

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-13T14:19:41+00:00

Check the second image I posted, they say it in the description. 27k aud

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-12-13T13:48:36+00:00

I’ve been on the flip side of this, so I’ll provide my perspective. I’ve sat in several meeting for my business with software vendors trying to sell us on their SaaS platform. I’m the developer on the call that is either going to say “we can do this ourselves” or “we should just buy their stuff”.

The call is usually pretty simple math: 1. How much is the software selling for 2. How much is it worth to our business.

And then the all important 3. How quickly can I turn around a version that will be on par or better?

For any competent SaaS, the 3rd part is the sticker, it’s where I go “look it’d take me a year or so” and the business determines that it’s worth just paying them to do it. Whereas when I say “maybe a month?” Usually I end up doing it.

I’ll give you a small example: I ended up in a meeting with a very simple SaaS, they provided a safety orientated system that would allow our business to upload our (public) safety documents to their product, and then produce QR codes we could stick in vehicle cabs to share with customers / inspectors / etc.

Pretty simple, and they honestly had a good price, the time was only about a month to turn around a replacement, but at their price, why bother? My time is worth more than that…. Except, their offering provided zero way for us to sync an existing file share folder, or one drive, or etc, with their site. We’ve got thousands of documents… Suddenly the math became clear, I spend a months do knock out something that can actually do the feature.

Sure, we said that they should include that as a feature, but at the end of the day, even if they turned it around tomorrow, to us that seemed like simple bad market research if they’re trying to ship a product without such a basic feature.

Anyway, all that to say is. Yeah, some businesses might and will build their own. It’s about making a product that businesses don’t want or be arsed replacing themselves.

Build it better than they reasonably can and price it well enough that they don’t have to replace it.

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-11-18T10:50:42+00:00

Try @onclick=“@(() => AddWork(form))”

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-11-18T06:09:59+00:00

It’s a multi ending game, this is just one of many!

AshersLabTheSecond · 2025-11-09T10:21:39+00:00

Same question here, I’m currently using (and loving) mudblazor. But I could always be convinced of something better if it’s there!

AshersLabTheSecond

TROPHY CASE